Emergence ‘two Englands’ differentiated by older & newer industries → impact slump ~~even~~
\
Slump hit hardest areas centred on staple industries (coal → N & S Wales; textiles → Yorkshire; 🚢building → Scotland & the Tyne → ↑ **unemploym**. than nat. average (**25**% workforce - 2.5 mil.) & ↓ **productivity**
* 🚢building: (^^1920s^^) 1 mil. tonnes new 🚢ing yearly (^^1933^^) 133,000 tonnes
* Older industries lost 1/3 workforce
* (^^1932^^) 60% 🚢builders unemploy.
\
In contrast, London, SE & Midlands remained prosperous as light, consumer & service industries boomed
* New methods production (e.g. assembly line & use electrical power) → goods creat. ↑ cheaply.
* (1939) motor industry employ. 1.4 mil ==but 🏭→ Midlands & SE== (***motor. revol.***)
* %%Trafford Park, near Manchester = 1st planned industrial estate, attracting a diverse range of light industries & employing nearly 50,000 by 1939.%%
\
(^^1934^^) GB: 10% insured pop. unemploy.
* Jarrow (NE) 70% after coal mine, steel works & Palmer’s 🚢yard closed
* St. Albans 3.9%
* Electrical industry ↑ workforce 250%
* Service + building industries ↑ workforce 40%
\
(^^1944^^) Beveridge calculated 85% all long-term unemploym. → S Wales, Scotland & N England
\
Migration of workers to ↑ prosperous districts Midlands & SE (1931 census - movem. to London - pop. ↑ to 8 mil.)