Media, Political Elites, & the Public

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/97

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

98 Terms

1
New cards
Public Opinion
The distribution of the population's beliefs about politics and policy issues
2
New cards
Pierre Bourdieu's Critique
Claimed that an idea may be something in public opinion, but it's difficult to measure
Non-response is a political statement
3
New cards
Aggregation
Condorcet "If individuals have a modest tendency to be correct, a collective decision by these individuals can have a very high likelihood of being right"
4
New cards
Heuristics
Individuals can use informational shortcuts to inform their thinking & behavior
Reading headlines & getting informed, memes
Shortcut for thinking and behavior
5
New cards
RAS (Receive, Accept, & Sample) Model
6
New cards
Reception Axiom
Greater level of cognitive engagement with an issue makes the person more likely to be exposed to & comprehend (receive) political messages concerning that issue
The more engaged you are on a knowledgeable base; interest → measures engagement
More likely to seek out information & comprehend it & understand it
Receiving information
7
New cards
Resistance Axiom
People tend to resist arguments that are inconsistent with their political predispositions, but only to the extent that they possess the contextual information necessary to perceive a relationship between the message & their predispositions
Being exposed to the information, receiving it, does not mean that you will accept it
Highly politically knowledgeable, high political interest, but not believing in climate change will not change your opinion
Accept information that is aligned with your belief & reject information that is not in line with your belief
People highly knowledgeable are better at accepting & resisting information
8
New cards
Accessibility Axiom
The more recently a consideration has been called to mind or thought about, the less it takes to retrieve that consideration or related considerations from memory & bring them to the head for use
9
New cards
Response Axiom
Individuals answer survey questions by averaging across considerations that are immediately salient or accessible to them
10
New cards
Political Elites
Persons who devote themselves full-time to some aspect of politics or public affairs
Include politicians, higher-level government officials, journalists, some activists, many kinds of experts & policy specialists
11
New cards
Party Conversion Thesis
Mass polarization along party lines could have come about from the reshuffling of party loyalties, with racial liberals flocking to the Democratic Party & racial conservatives moving to the Republican side
12
New cards
Opinion Leadership Thesis
Polarization could have come about from opinion conversion; existing Democrats becoming more racially liberal & existing Republicans becoming more racially conservative
13
New cards
Political Awareness
Refers to the extent to which an individual pays attention to politics & understands what he or she has encountered
14
New cards
Political Predisposition
Stable, individual-level traits that regulate the acceptance or non-acceptance of the political communications the person receives
A characteristic of individuals that is predictive of political behavior
People's opinions are a combination of information & prior beliefs
Party membership
Giving a set of political considerations, things you believe in politics, background, upbringing, comes from peers, friends, family, etc.
15
New cards
Values
General & enduring standards that hold a more central position than attitudes in an individual's belief systems & that lead us to take particular positions on social issues
16
New cards
Consideration
Any reason that makes an individual decide to come down on one side of a political issue (i.e. a position)
Any reason to think about a political issue
Any reason that might induce an individual to decide a political issue one way or another; a compound of cognition & affect
17
New cards
Cognition
A belief concerning an object
"What I know about an object"; your knowledge of an object
18
New cards
Affect
An evaluation of a belief
Evaluation on an object
19
New cards
Persuasive Messages
Arguments providing a reason for taking a position. If accepted by an individual, they become considerations
Messaging, expecting, and providing a reason to people to sample from the side of distribution
Ex: Informing people about a product
Arguments or images providing a reason for taking a position or point of view; if accepted by an individual, they become considerations
20
New cards
Cueing Messages
Contextual information about the ideological or partisan implications of a persuasive message. Allows individuals to link between the persuasive message & political predisposition
Allows you to persuade but not in a politically neutral way
Links it to an ideology or party
Ex: "I want you to buy my product"
21
New cards
Ideology
A set of stable, more or less consistent set of ideas about the world that provides a guideline for political action
22
New cards
Party ID
A subjective association with a political party (psychological bond)
A sense of belonging that an individual feels for a political party, a psychological attachment to a party
Stems from upbringing
23
New cards
Core of Zaller's Argument
The probability that a person will support or oppose a given policy depends on the mix of positive & negative considerations available in the person's mind when answering a question
24
New cards
Panel Survey
Same set of people, living in a household, that are traced & asked to survey across their life course
25
New cards
Opinion Statements
The outcome of a process in which people receive new information, decide whether to accept it, & then sample at the moment of answering questions
26
New cards
Rational Updating ("Cold Cognition"/Bayesian Updating) (Gerber & Green)
Expectations over economy → is it better or worse
System 2 cognition
Rational processing; updating downwards or upwards depending on the information
Discussion on what's rational or not; Directional updating → willing to update both sides
27
New cards
Biased Updating ("Hot Cognition"/Motivated Reasoning) (Taber & Lodge)
Idea of responding right away → system 1 responding
Seeing something, & reacting straightway
Motivate in such a way that your party always looks better than the other parties
Impression of motivated reasoning in the graph of perceptions of the economy
Some people do not want to hear certain/bad information; most often reject bad information & accept good information
28
New cards
Partisanship
The extent to which people identify with supporters of a party
29
New cards
Prospective Performance Evaluation
How they assess what a party does in government/parliament
30
New cards
Party Differential
A combination of prior beliefs & current information
If correlated over time, voters use information from today's performance to make inferences about what parties will do in the future
They adjust their expectations of policies for the future based on the past of the party
31
New cards
Accuracy Goal
We are motivated to use correct information; In line with motivated reasoning
32
New cards
Partisan Goal
We are motivated to defend our priors
33
New cards
Prior Attitude Effect
People who feel strongly about an issue — even when encouraged to be objective & leave their preferences aside — will evaluate supportive arguments as stronger & more compelling than opposing arguments
34
New cards
Disconfirmation Bias
People will spend more time & cognitive resources denigrating & counterarguing attitudinally incongruent than congruent arguments
35
New cards
Confirmation Bias
When free to choose what information they will expose themselves to people will seek out confirming over disconfirming arguments
36
New cards
Attitude Strength Effect
Those citizens voicing the strongest policy attitudes will be most prone to motivated reasoning
37
New cards
Sophistication Effect
The politically knowledgeable, because they possess greater ammunition with which to counter-argue incongruent facts, figures, & arguments, will be more susceptible to motivated bias than will unsophisticated
38
New cards
Malinformation
Has a purpose of individual harm in the private interest
Ex: Acts of bullying, fabricating personal letters to deliberately harm personal cooperative interest, & going as far as revenge porn; Deliberate change of context, date or time of genuine content
39
New cards
Information
Facts provided about something that generally involves data & investigation. It is data that has been converted into a more useful or intelligible form (e.g. each sale is a data point, & monthly sales are information)
"How many migrants are in a country; this is what people think, here's a survey; politicians state this..."
40
New cards
Misinformation
Information that is false, but not intended to cause harm. For example, individuals who don't know a piece of information is false may spread it on social media in an attempt to be helpful
Providing information with false data, but the person may not know it's false; Unintentional
Ex: Inaccurate captions, dates, statistics or translations, or when satire is taken seriously
41
New cards
Disinformation (Malinformation)
False information that is deliberately created or disseminated with the express purpose to cause harm. Producers of disinformation typically have political, financial, psychological, or social motivations
Ex: Intentionally created conspiracy theories or rumors
42
New cards
Exposure Effect
More likely to cumulate for people who pay more attention to potentially misleading news & information
More exposure, more acceptance
People who hold things to be true, select a lot of information that feeds to their misinformation, which leads to a cycle
43
New cards
Cognitive Scrutiny Effects
When people fail to apply adequate cognitive scrutiny to the dubious claims they receive
Double-check/fact-check that information
44
New cards
Source Identity Effects
People are more vulnerable to information from trusted sources
If you know the source, you're more likely to believe the source
Could be partisanship, people from your network in social media (family members, friends)
45
New cards
Sophistication Effects
More knowledge does not always reduce misperceptions, may actually be more susceptible to false claims
Rejecting information that's not in line with our beliefs
46
New cards
Attitude Formation
An interactive process between people's predispositions & the information they receive from intermediary actors
47
New cards
Cueing
Relates to political messages that aim to move people to a side, i.e. move opinion
Either the political elites or media put messages to move people to either one side or another
48
New cards
Bottom-up (Cueing)
Reaction of elites to stances of voters through process of representation & responsiveness (voters cue elites)
49
New cards
Top-down (Cueing)
Mass publics take position of elites through processes of priming & persuasion (elites cue voters)
50
New cards
Mainstream Effect
Political elites across the political spectrum are in consensus about the policy
Greater political awareness, greater reception of mainstream messages, so if all cueing messages are favorable → Acceptance of policy
Convincing people to align that consensus
All cueing messages are on the same side
51
New cards
Polarization Effect
Political elites across the political spectrum disagree about the policy
Greater political awareness, greater reception of messages in line with your prior and more reception → Polarization about policy
52
New cards
Normalization
If people observe a norm not being followed, then they may begin to see compliance as both optional & less normatively desirable, especially if norm violations occur frequently
53
New cards
Desensitization
The tendency for aversive stimuli to evoke weaker psychological responses as exposure levels increase
More you see the same images, the less impact they have on you
54
New cards
Limited Exposure
Only a small segment of voters follow media messages about politics
55
New cards
Selective Exposure
People tend to expose themselves to messages favorable of 'their candidate'
56
New cards
Biased Perception
Confirmation bias distorts information reception
57
New cards
Agenda-setting
Ability by the media to influence the perceived importance of topics through intensity & selective attention in media messages
Media sets the agenda, raises salience or raises the importance of the issue
The ability of media to influence the importance of issues in people's mind
Priorities of the press may become priorities of people
58
New cards
Framing of Media
Presenting media messages from a certain angle
59
New cards
Frame
An angle with which an issue is being presented, i.e. packaging the issue in such a way as to encourage certain interpretations & to discourage others
Provide people with a quick & easy way to process information
Serve as mental filters to make sense of incoming messages
A "central organizing idea, suggesting what is at issue"
Not only saying what is happening, but how to think about the issue
60
New cards
First-Level Agenda-Setting
The media's ability to influence the salience & importance of issues; this involves the media's power to determine which topics receive attention & prominence
61
New cards
Second-Level Agenda-Setting
The media's influence on the attributes, characteristics, & framing of the issues they cover. It includes shaping the public's understanding of the issues & associated details
62
New cards
Marshall Plan (1948)
Largest foreign assistance program in the century in which financial help was given by the US to Europe to recover from WWII
Massive transfer of aid money to help rebuild postwar Western Europe, intended to bolster capitalist and democratic governments and prevent domestic communist groups from riding poverty and misery to power
63
New cards
"Rally-Round-The-Flag" Effect
Refers to the tendency of public support for the president to increase in the time of a foreign policy crises
Every in-group has the same division but when a group is threatened by an external threat, groups tend to come together
For a while, groups become cohesive, more coherent, & more powerful
64
New cards
Selection Bias
If your sample is systematically different from the broader population you are interested in (i.e. "non-representative"), then the estimates you get from the sample & true effects in the population will be different ("bias")
65
New cards
Survey Experiment
Take a group of people that resemble people you're trying to understand
Ex: Trying to understand Italian public opinion, you take a group of Italian people
66
New cards
League of Nations
Founded after WWI
WWIwas violent, deadly, & the first major industrial war to occur
War had changed, people saw that war can be more destructive & violent compared to before
Main purpose: Preserve peace
Product of a 9-month-long conference
Brainchild of US President Wilson
Unfortunately, Wilson failed to convince the US Congress to ratify the agreement & join the League of Nations
Born without US support, LN was ineffective & replaced by UN after WWII
67
New cards
Agreement Stage
Level 1: Involves bargaining between national actors
68
New cards
Ratification Stage
Level 2: Involves bargaining between domestic actors
69
New cards
Involuntary Defection
Agreement signed, but not ratified by a country
70
New cards
Winset
The set of all the proposals that an actor prefers to the "no agreement" option
71
New cards
Hardline Domestic Public (Opinion)
Provides a democratic leader with a "manifest instability to make concessions"
Must be vulnerable to public opinion in the domestic stage
It can make the country's Level 1 winset smaller & bring an advantage BUT, if public opinion makes Level 1 win-set "too" small, then negotiations can collapse
72
New cards
Politicization
Making an issue political, debating it as an issue of public contestation
73
New cards
Nonrepresentative Sample
Draws biased inferences
74
New cards
Issue (or Political/Ideological) Polarization
Differences among people's policy positions
DISAGREEING with the other party
How much you disagree about the ideas of people who belong to other political parties or movements in your society
Process of polarization
75
New cards
Affective Polarization
Negative feelings toward other political parties & their supporters
DISLIKING the other party
People have strong emotions toward people who belong to other political parties
Process of polarization
76
New cards
Elite Polarization
Divisions among elected officials, party activists, policy intellectuals
Level of polarization
77
New cards
Mass Polarization
Divisions among voters, ordinary citizens
Level of polarization
78
New cards
Partisan Divergence
Voters of different parties having increasingly divergent opinions of policy
People from different parties, increasingly move away from each other in the ideological space
79
New cards
Party Sorting
Voters sorting into parties so that people with similar views are all in one party
80
New cards
Feeling Thermometer
"How do you feel about the other party's voters?"
Giving surveys to people from different parties & asking what they think about different political parties
A way to measure Affective Polarization
81
New cards
Echochamber
When, especially through social media, where you only talk to or read tweets from people who think like you
Try & get you to engage
One way is by showing you things that you agree with
Confirmation Bias
82
New cards
Social Movement
A loosely organized & sustained effort by a large group of people to achieve a social or political goal; Ex: Black lives Matter & MeToo Movement
83
New cards
Signaling
An action taken by an informed party to reveal private information to an uninformed party
84
New cards
Costly Signal
An action that involves some risk or sacrifice; or else a person would not commit the signal
85
New cards
Horizontalism
Technology has allowed ad hoc organizing to address coordination & logistical needs in an unprecedented fashion, with no prior experience of working together
86
New cards
Slacktivism
The tendency to click on links or like posts rather than take concrete actions or steps
87
New cards
Leadership
The role of the media in influencing who has standing in the movement
88
New cards
Action Strategy
The role of the media in influencing which collective-action strategies & tactics are pursued
89
New cards
Framing Strategy
The role of the media in influencing how the movement represents its message in the contest over meaning
90
New cards
Standing
The extent to which the group is taken seriously by being given extensive media coverage, regardless of content
91
New cards
Preferred Framing
The prominence of the group's frame in media discourse on the issues of concern
92
New cards
Movement Sympathy
The extent to which the content of the coverage presents the group in a way that is likely to gain sympathy from relevant publics
93
New cards
Positive Treatment
Describing X as better than the Y (Ex: Describes the COVACID as better than the flu vax)
Increases acceptance & reduces beliefs in conspiracies
94
New cards
Neutral Treatment
Describing the X as equal in all aspects to the Y (Ex: Describes the COVACID as equal in all aspects to the flu vax)
Doesn't affect acceptance, but increases conspiracy & also slightly raises trust
95
New cards
Negative Treatment
Describes the X as inferior to Y (Ex: Describes the COVACID as less effective, with more side effects, & a shorter test period than the flu vax)
Reduces acceptance & slightly increases conspiracies
96
New cards
Vague Treatment
Describe the X broadly (Ex: Suggests that publicly available information does not allow for precise comparisons with the flu vax, but authorities say COVACID is "sufficiently effective")
Brings an increase in conspiracy theories & decreases trust
97
New cards
Domestic Audience Cost
The domestic price a leader would pay for making foreign threats and then backing down
98
New cards
Veto Players
Any domestic actor whose approval/consent is necessary for an international agreement to be implemented