1/3
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Plan
Thesis - French intervention determined British defeat
Criteria - Scale of support, transformative, catalyst
French intervention
American strength
British weaknesses
French intervention
Joined June 1778
Detracted British attentions -> 65% British army in 1778, 20% in 1780
Intervention of French fleet at Chesapeake Bay -> de Grasse and French navy controlled the bay-> decisive battle of the war
Boosted American forces -> French soldiers joined Washington’s army of 16,000 troops -> just under 10,000 soldiers, but more skilled than Continental Army which was randoms
Judgement - catalyst, transformative → determined British defeat
American strength
Ideological commitment -> 40-45% patriots, ‘Glorious Cause’, neutrals turned away from British, 12,000 copies of common sense
Washington’s leadership -> Continental Army an increasingly professionalised, centralised military body supported and funded by Congress -> strategic retreats -> technically lost at Bunker Hill but British casualties were 1000/2500 and American less than half
Fighting on their own land -> familiarity with terrain, ability to scatter, transport links and swift communication
Saratoga without French -> first American victory, 5895 British POWs
Judgement - Americans surviving but not winning → small scale
British weaknesses
Expensive -> £232m national debt by 1783 -> City of London advised that war was harming trade
Bad war strategy -> no seaboard and defensive strategy, no central body to attack, limited guidance from London -> Clinton returned to NY after siege of Charleston, leaving Cornwallis to fight southern campaign with 4000 men
Logistically difficult -> loyalist support in pockets, armies deep in landmass, supply lines stretched further, reliant on generals to pincer colonials -> Burgoyne’s failure at Saratoga because of lack of communication
Judgement → result of French intervention