Factors affecting attraction- Attractiveness

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/6

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

7 Terms

1
New cards

Attraction

  • We are more attracted to people who are physically good looking

  • Evolutionary explanation is the physical indications of health, facial symmetry and recourses indicate good genes, we want the best genes possible for our offspring

2
New cards

What is the Halo effect?

  • People with the physical characteristic of physical attractiveness are also assumed to be as successful in other areas of life e.g: intelligent, hardworking, sociable

  • This can result in others interacting more positively towards them, resulting in them becoming more successful

3
New cards

Key ideas on physical attractiveness

  • Neotenous (baby-like) features in females (e.g. small nose, big eyes) are also rated as attractive

  • Perhaps because they trigger a caring instinct

  • Good for females who want to reproduced

  • Attractiveness is important at the start of a relationship

  • Shackelford and Larson(1997)- symmetrical faces are considered attractive by many people- evolutionary approach

4
New cards

What is the matching hypothesis?

  • We cannot all mate with the most attractive members of our population

  • We realistically appraise our own attractiveness in relation to others

  • We look for romantic partners who are at a similar level of attractiveness

  • We avoid the pain of rejection by not chasing partners we see as too attractive

  • We retain our partners by not choosing someone who will leave us for someone else

5
New cards

Research on physical attractiveness and the matching hypothesis

  • Mustein (1972) matching photographs

  • Used photographs of 197 couples (engaged or dating)

  • Photos of each partner alone were used so each person could be judged individally

  • Eight judges rated the individual photographs according to attractiveness

  • Found photographs of couples were consistently given a similar attractiveness rating compared to randomly matched pairs

  • This supports the matching hypothesis individuals

  • Supported by Feingold (1988) who conducted a meta analysis including 18 studies and 164 couples- found an overall positive correlation in attractiveness ratings of couples

6
New cards

Limitations

  • Some people do not seem to attach much importance to physical attractiveness

  • Standards of attractiveness vary across cultures and times- socially constructed and not necessarily universal- reduces generalisabilty

  • Attraction has limited explanatory power- predicts initial attraction but doesn’t determine long term

  • Reductionist- ignores other factors such as nurture

7
New cards

Strengths

  • Evolutionary explanation- signals health and fertility

  • Suggests preferences for attractiveness are biologically adaptive and support a nature based explanation