1/69
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
types of structures
sole trader
partnership
public listed company
private limited company
social enterprises
government business enterprises (GBE)
unincorporated business
a business is not a seperate legal entity from its owner
unlimited liability
business owner is fully responsible for business debts or harm due to not being seperate legal entities
sole trader
owned and operated by one person
- name must be registered to ASIC if its different to BO name
evaluating sole traders
positives:
- owner has complete control over business decisions
- owners right to keep all profits
negatives:
- unlimited liability
- significant burden of management due to working alone
partnership
owned and operated by 2-20 people
- general: partners have unlimited liability
- limited: liability to partners is limited to portion of investment
- seperate tfn and lodge own tax return
- after taxes, profits are divided according to agreement
evaluating partnerships
positives:
shared responsibility and workload
pooled funds and talents - variety of expertise and ideas, potential for expansion
negatives
unlimited liability
disputes affect cooperation
incorporated
business and owner are seperate legal entities - becomes a registered company
limited liability
shareholders are legally responsible for the debts of a company only to the extent of the nominal values of their shares
private limited company
1-50 non employee shareholders (must be offered and approved by owners)
- one director has overall responsibility for managing
- identified by pty ltd
evaluating pty ltd companies
positives:
- limited liability
- greated variety of expertise due to experience management
negatives:
- taxed on profits or dividends, and income from company to shasreholder is taxed as personal income
- cost of formation is more expensive than sole trader or partnership
public listed company
shared are available to the public and are purchased on the ASX
- min one shareholder, no max
- required to publish audited financial accs each year
evaluating public lsited companies (similar to pty ltd)
positive:
- additional capital through issuing shares
negative:
- more legal compliance
- complex structure
social enterprise
primary objective of fulfilling a social need whilst still aiming to make a profit (reinvested to meet objectives)
- reliant on govt funding and grants
evaluating social enterprises
Positives:
Meeting social needs can have a positive effect on profit and market share
Open up new markets by targeting needs traditional businesses choose not to (little competition)
Negatives:
significant operating costs as SE take on costs that conventional businesses would not (in relation to CSR)
Difficulty in focusing on both social and financial objectives (pursuing social goals increases costs, pursuing financial goals requires cost cutting)
GBE
govt owned and operated
- make profit whilst carrying out govt policies
- aims to increase value and returns for their shareholder (govt)
evaluating GBEs
Positives:
able to carry out government policies delivering community services in areas where private sector businesses might hesitate to invest (fill gap in the market)
provision of healthy competition to businesses operating in the private sector (due to their low prices as they do not solely aim to make a profit) - lowering prices in the markets where GBEs are operating (avoids private sector businesses from overcharging)
Negatives:
political pressures and influence can affect decisions and operations of the business (to benefit politics rather than customers) which can impact long term success
management of GBEs can be less effect than that of a private sector because they face more government rules, slower decision-making processes, and less pressure to maximise profit.
business objectives
• To make a profit
• To increase market share
• To improve efficiency
• To improve effectiveness
• To fulfil a market need
• To fulfil a social need
• To meet shareholder expectations
to make a profit
aim to generate higher revenue than expenses to make profit and avoid loss
increase market share
make product/business more competitive to boost sales and increase revenue
improve efficiency
using fewer resources to produce same number of output (reduces operating costs = more profit)
improve effectiveness
the capacity of the business to meet objectives
• consistently make a profit, implement strategies to increase market share
• skilled, engaged and motivated staff are better positioned to achieve its objectives
fulfil a market
identify a product or service that is not available (gap) in the market that is desired and produce that product that people would purchase (filling it)
fulfil a social need
providing goods or services that will improve quality of life in the community
meet shareholder expectations
• maintain/grow share price
• pay out valuable dividends
stakeholders
owner (incl. shareholders)
manager
employees
customers
suppliers
general community
interest of owners
want business to make profit as their income and wealth is dependent on its success
interest of shareholders
receiving a return on their investment - value of shares and amt of dividends affected by business success
interest of managers
fairly renumerated when business performs well and achieves its objectives
maintianing socially responsible practices to increase sales
satisfy stakeholder expectations whilst maintaing secure position
interest of employees
fair pay
proper training
ethical treatment
job security
interest of customers
awareness of socially responsible business - influences purchasing decisions
high quality goods/services for fair pricies
market needs addressed
interest of suppliers
provide quality materials to produce high quality goods and services
reliable and timely delivvery in correct quanitity
good business performance = more demand for materials
interest of general community
expect business to contribute positively to society when it benefits from the resources and support that society provides
show concern for future welfare through their own employment within businesses
show concern for environment, social issues and economic conditions (TBL)
potential conflicts
owners vs employee conflicts
owners want to maximise return on profit whilst minimizing expenses, done so by reducing wages/hours, upset employees and have a financial impact on them
managers vs customers conflicts
implement strategies on behalf of the owner to achieve their interests (profit)) and business objects, by increasing prices, lowering quality - conflicts customer expectations for well priced goods and quality service
suppliers vs general community
partake in unethical practices to reduce costs and maximise profits, conflicting with the interests of general community
managers vs suppliers
management wants to keep costs down to improve profits, but suppliers want to charge higher prices for raw materials to cover their costs and make profit
management styles
autocratic
persuasive
consultative
participative
laissez-faire
autocratic
owner/manager assertively dictates objectives and how they are achieved
evaluating autocratic management style
positive
control retained by manager allows for clearly defined directions and procedures, limiting uncertainty
time efficient due to lack of consultation or discussion
negatives
control retained by manager can cause them overwork and deal with pressure alone
no discussion discourages employee input, leading to lost opportunities for better decisions → negative morale
persuasive
owner/manager dictates objectives and how they are achieved through persuasion (justifies why their way is right)
evaluating persuasive management style
positive
control retained by manager allows for clearly defined instructions
more likely to gain trust and support compared to autocratic
negatives
poor communication leads to less considered decisions
employees may not feel empowered
consultative
owner/manager asks for employees opinion before making the ultimate decision themselves
evaluating consultative management style
positive
enhanced decision making as ideas are expanded and shared
seeking employee input increases satisfaction
negatives
consultation slows down decision making process
possibility of resentment if employee suggestions are ignored
participative
decision-making responsibility is shared with the employees to create a consensus decision
evaluating participative management style
positive
recognises skills and abilities of employees, empowering them to make decisions
optimal job satisfaction as employees feel that they have played an active role
negatives
reaching decisions can be time consuming when considering differing views
conflict and disagreement can arise with different opinions being shared
laissez-faire
employees are totally responsible for decision-making and operations of the business, and the manager has no central role or power
evaluating laissez-faire management style
positive
trusting and empowering for employees, providing a sense of ownership
creative ideas can arise given the high degree of individual responsibility
negatives
can potentially lead to a loss of control or conflicts arising between staff over direction
focus on meeting objectives can erode due to too much freedom, causing the business to fail
appropriateness of management style
nature of the task
time
experience of employees
manager preference
nature of task
• urgent and vital tasks lead to a greater desire for the manager to take control (autocratic leaning)
• more creative tasks that would benefit from team discussions and input are more laissez-faire leaning.
time
tighter deadlines are more autocratic leaning
extended timeframe may be more participative
experience of employees
• autocratic style is more appropriate for inexperience employees as it may not be worth asking their opinion and instead need to be ‘instructed’
• highly experienced staff should be trusted for their opinion and are left to their own decision making via laissez-faize style
manager preference
a manager will often utilize a management style that matches their personality, beliefs, skills or values
management skills
communication
delegation
planning
leadership
decision-making
interpersonal relationships
communication
the transfer of information from a sender to a receiver
delegation
transfer of responsibilities from a manager to an employee to carry out specific activities
planning
the process of determining the strategies required to best achieve a business objective
strategic: long term plans (2-5 yrs)
tactical: medium term (1-2 yrs)
operational: short term (daily, weekly)
SOS AIM • Set • Objective • SWOT analysis • Alternatives • Implement • Monitor
leadership
guiding the business and its employees towards achieving its objectives
clear vision
sharing that vision with others
coordinating and balancing conflicting interests of stakeholders
decision making
the process of purposely choosing a course of action from a set of alternatives to achieve business objectives
interpersonal relationships
employees ability to build positive relationships with others while getting the job done
relationship b/w management styles and skills
skills for autocratic management
communication: one way, ensure that the message is delivered correctly the first time - dont rely on feedback for clarification
delegation: sole decision maker, decides on the delegation of tasks without other opinions
planning: setting objectives and action plans that employees are expected to follow without input
skills for persuasive management
communication: one-way, no feedback, in a persuading way, explains and gives justification for decisions
leadership: directing and guiding employees through one way communication
interpersonal: taking account of employees to adjust the way info is communicated
skills for consultative management
communication: two way, ask for feedback before making the ultiamte decision
decision-making/leadership: consider all ideas employees and actually makes the final decision
interpersonal: encourages two way communication and employees feel comfortable sharing their ideas
skills for participative management
communication: two way communication between employees to express their ideas (may need to be constrained due to time-consuming nature)
leadership: guides the groups vision to make a decision
decision making: decision is made jointly by the group and manager
skills for laissez-faire management
communication: two way, providing minimal guidance and allows employees to communicate and make decisions independently
delegation: handing responsibility of tasksfor employee to work on individually
planning: manager outlines terms and due dates of a project before employee works on it
corporate culture
the shared values, beliefs and practices of a business
official
real
official culture
the values and beliefs that a company is conveying to the public
logos
mission statement
symbols
slogan
real culture
the actual values and beliefs present in a company observable from:
behaviour
language, treatment
celebration of events
policies, procedures