1/58
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
micro
study of social influences on people, small group interactions (typically less than 10 people)
meso
study of larger groups like organizations and social networks
macro
study of large-scale, broad social systems like the education system, political system, the economy, and comparisons of geopolitical units
ecological fallacy
using data or measurement concepts from group level data to draw conclusions about individuals
quantitative data collection
data collection that distills people’s responses and reactions to numbers that can be statistically analyzed
qualitative data collection
data collection involves thorough descriptions of people’s lived experiences and/or written/visual media
mixed methods data collection
a study that has both quantitative and qualitative aspects as main focus
triangulation
use of mixed methods to study the same research question to ‘hone in’ on findings about that question
helps to balance those issues to generate a thorough accounting of the research question at hand
basic research
research that seeks to answer a fundamental intellectual puzzle about our social world
no immediate goal to produce something or evaluate a program
overall intent is to understand the phenomena better/more completely
applied research
research that addresses a concrete, specific, localized real-world problem or evaluate a policy/program
goals are immediate in nature to a specific issue
scientific method for class
identify an important question that needs an answer
two parts
construct a hypothesis/prediction about the answer to that question, or:
construct a way to generate a better understanding of that question
gather data that allows for the assessment of the accuracy of that prediction
deception
deceiving participants about some facet(s) of the study
theory
a set of related arguments consisting of a series of logically related statements that explicate some element of social life
does not try to explain everything about social life
textbook: well-reasoned supposition about a social phenomenon that moves logically and systematically from one point to related points and to a conclusion or expectation
empiricism
the world can be subjected to observation to gather data about social phenomena
theory without empirical evidence is just speculation in search of proff
purposes of theory
to explore: theory guides researchers studying social phenomena by pointing researchers to important research questions and ways of considering the world
to describe: capturing thick, rich, detailed data of as many elements of a social phenomena as possible to generate an understanding of how and why it occurs
to explain: predict a process through which a social phenomena unfolds, pose hypotheses that can then be empirically tested that would then support or not the theory
inductive (ideographic) theory
start with a research question to guide data collection
empirical social reality —> 2. theory (moving up)
deductive (nomothetic) theory
start with a research question and use theory to guide hypotheses
theory —> 2. empirical social reality (moving down)
paradigms
very abstract set of assumptions about the way the world is
concept
an idea that can be named, defined, and eventually measured in some way
importance of a strong definition
neither true nor false
theoretical statements
a conditional relation among abstract, general concepts
domain
the phenomenon to be explained by the theory
scope
condition(s) under which a theory is meant to apply (i.e. explain the domain)
given scope conditions, X —> Y because of T
X = casual concept (cause)
Y = resultant concept (effect)
—> = statement of relation
T = tentative explanation for why X and Y are related
growth of theory - elaboration
using existing conceptual ideas or models as a foundation to develop new theoretical insights
growth of theory - proliferation
the deliberate creation and development of multiple competing and even contradictory theories to foster the growth of knowledge
growth of theory - competition
creating incentives for researchers to seek priority in making discoveries, obtain funding, and gain prestige
growth of theory - integration
combining concepts, variables, and methods from different theories or research to create a more comprehensive and robust theoretical framework
nomothetic/deductive causality
establishing that change in the causal concept creates change in the resultant concept
nomothetic causality = internal validity
3 criteria for internal validity - 1. association/correlation
a statistically significant correlation between two variables
3 criteria for internal validity - 2. temporal order
a change in the causal variable must come before a change in the resultant variable
effects do not spurn changes in causes
3 criteria for internal validity - 3. nonspuriousness
is X the true cause of Y, or is some third vairble, Z, the cause of both
Z = spurious cause
temporal order: Design
cross sectional: data are collected at one point in time
a snapshot
longitudinal: data are collected at two or more points in time
repeated cross sectional study
panel study
when is Z a non-problem?
if we know what it is
establishing non spuriousness with control variables
when using survey data, varibles are “statistically controlled”
a 3rd varible is held constant so that the relationship between the causal and resultant concepts’ varibles can be examined without it affecting that relationship
statistical control (establishing nonspuriousness)
the relationship between X and Y disappears
suggests a spurious relationship…therefore not causal
the relationship between X and Y persists (even if weakened)
suggests that the relationship is not spurious…therefore stronger evidence for causality
mediation
there is an intervening variable, Z, between X and Y
BUT, when Z is a mediator it creases a causal link between X and Y
create a causal connection between the cause and effect
moderation
variables that alter the relationship between the cause and effect
affect the nature of the relationship between the cause and effect
conceptualization - from theory to hypothesis
precisely defining ideas/meaning of each concept and turning them into variables
conceptual: a definition in abstract, theoretical terms that gives meaning to all aspects of a concept relevant to the theory
operalization - from theory to hypothesis
linking the conceptual definition to a specific set of measurement techniques or procedures
turns concepts into something you can measure
from conceptualization to operationalization
conceptualizations matter for how we think of and measure that thing
concepts must be:
exhaustive: all elements of that concept are represented
mutually exclusive: only elements of the concept is part of the measure and not elements of a different concept (conceptual boundaries)
units of analysis
level of social life that a research question is about
individuals or some type of aggregation
aggregations: counting or averaging individual-level data in some grouping to capture group-level data
reductionist fallacy
using data or measurement concepts from individual-level data to draw conclusions about groups
levels of measurement: categorical
variables have a finite set of possible values that are fixed and distinct from one another with unknown differences between them
levels of meausrement: categorical
nominal varibles: varibales with states that are parallel and cannot be ranked or orderred; attributes are only exhausitve and mutually exclusive
levels of measurement: categorical
ordinal varibles: variables with categories that can be ordered in some way but have unknowable differences/distances between them
levels of measurement: continuous
varibles that could have an infinite set of possible values that exist on a continuum from low to high with meaningful and identifiable differences between them
levels of measurement: continuous
interval varibles: varibales with a continuum of values with equal meaningful distances (or intervals) between them but no true zero
levels of measurement: continuous
ratio varibles: interval varibles that do have a true zero
writing a hypothesis in sentence format
depends on how the varibles are hypothesized to relate to each othe rnad the type of varibles they are (categorical or continuous)
if IV and/or DV is categorical then direction of association rules do not apply
measurement error
true differences
error
systematic measurement error: something consistently wrong with how your measure is working
random measurement error: error happening at random in data
face validity
jusdement by the scientific community that an indicator really measures the concept
content validity
is the full content of the concept’s definition represented in the measure
construct validity
how well do multiple indicators of a concept connect together (hang together) to reflect a single, underlying factor
divergent validity
is it the case that indicators of one concept that should not be associated with other concepts
reliability across time
stability reliability
test-retest reliability: strong positive correlation between scores on a measure administed to the same sample at two points in time
intra- rater or intra-observer reliability when talking about raters or observers
reliability across indicators
inter-item reliability: strong correlation among all items in a composite measure
suggests a homogenous set of items with a strong correlation
reliability across observers
intercoder or interobserver reliability: strong correleation in data coding produced by different coders or observers
reliability across populations
representative reliability: consistency of response across populations of people
subpopulation analysis
improving reliability
clearly conceptualize all concepts to eliminate noise
each measure should indicate one and only one concpet/feature of the concpet
increase level of measurement
use multiple indivators
use pretests, pilot studies, replication