Forensic psychology midterm Textbook

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/1833

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 6:07 PM on 2/6/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

1834 Terms

1
New cards
How is forensic psychology portrayed on TV and in movies?
Inaccurately and exaggerated
2
New cards
Do forensic psychologists perform tasks shown in media?
Yes, but not in the way media portrays them
3
New cards
What makes forensic psychology different from other psychology fields?
Focus on behavior within a legal context
4
New cards
What are forensic psychologists interested in understanding?
Thoughts, feelings, and actions of people
5
New cards
Why do forensic psychologists do things other psychologists rarely do?
They work within legal and justice contexts
6
New cards
When did forensic psychology begin?
Late 19th century
7
New cards
Was the field originally called forensic psychology?
No
8
New cards
Did early researchers identify themselves as forensic psychologists?
No
9
New cards
Why are early psychologists still important to forensic psychology?
Their work laid the foundation for the field
10
New cards
Where did early forensic psychology research emerge?
United States and Europe
11
New cards
Who conducted the first experiments relevant to forensic psychology?
James McKeen Cattell
12
New cards
What was Cattell known for studying?
Human cognitive processes
13
New cards
Who did Cattell work with in Leipzig, Germany?
Wilhelm Wundt
14
New cards
What area of research did Cattell contribute to?
Psychology of eyewitness testimony
15
New cards
What was the title of Cattell’s 1895 study?
Measurements of Accuracy of Recollection
16
New cards
Who participated in Cattell’s study?
University psychology students
17
New cards
What kind of questions did Cattell ask participants?
Questions about everyday memories
18
New cards
What did Cattell find about memory accuracy?
Memories were often inaccurate
19
New cards
What did Cattell find about confidence and accuracy?
They were not strongly related
20
New cards
Why were Cattell’s findings important for the legal system?
They highlighted problems with eyewitness testimony
21
New cards
Who studied suggestibility in children around the same time?
Alfred Binet
22
New cards
What was Binet’s key work called?
La Suggestibilité
23
New cards
What did Binet demonstrate about children’s testimony?
It is highly susceptible to suggestion
24
New cards
What method produced the most accurate responses in children?
Free recall
25
New cards
What type of questions produced the least accurate responses?
Highly misleading questions
26
New cards
Who summarized Binet’s work in 1993?
Ceci and Bruck
27
New cards
Who continued research on witness suggestibility after Binet?
William Stern
28
New cards
What experimental method is attributed to William Stern?
The reality experiment
29
New cards
What is the reality experiment?
Participants observe a staged event and later recall it
30
New cards
Who conducted the 1901 eyewitness study with Stern?
Franz von Liszt
31
New cards
Who were the participants in Stern’s study?
Law students
32
New cards
What happened in Stern’s staged classroom event?
An argument escalated and a revolver was drawn
33
New cards
What was Stern’s main finding?
Eyewitness testimony was often inaccurate
34
New cards
When was recall accuracy the worst?
During highly emotional moments
35
New cards
Who was one of the first psychologists to testify as an expert witness?
Albert von Schrenck-Notzing
36
New cards
When did Schrenck-Notzing testify in court?
1896
37
New cards
What kind of case did Schrenck-Notzing testify in?
Three sexual murder cases
38
New cards
What major issue surrounded the case?
Heavy pretrial publicity
39
New cards
What concept did Schrenck-Notzing introduce?
Retroactive memory falsification
40
New cards
What is retroactive memory falsification?
Confusing real memories with later media information
41
New cards
How can media affect eyewitness memory?
It can distort or alter recall
42
New cards
Which later researchers supported these findings?
Ogloff and Vidmar
43
New cards
What is the key takeaway about eyewitness memory?
It is malleable
44
New cards
Who conducted early research on children’s suggestibility in 1911?
Julian Varendonck
45
New cards
Who described Varendonck’s study later?
Ceci and Bruck
46
New cards
What was unique about Varendonck’s study?
The person described by children did not exist
47
New cards
What did children often do in Varendonck’s study?
Describe a fictitious person
48
New cards
What does this study show about children’s testimony?
It is highly influenced by suggestion
49
New cards
What conclusion was drawn for court cases?
Children’s eyewitness testimony should be treated cautiously
50
New cards
Who were early advocates for forensic psychology in North America?
Hugo Münsterberg and William James
51
New cards
Where did Hugo Münsterberg study?
With Wilhelm Wundt
52
New cards
Where did Münsterberg work in the U.S.?
Harvard University
53
New cards
Who collaborated with Münsterberg on interrogation research?
William James
54
New cards
What issues were U.S. courts debating in the early 1900s?
Confessions and reliability of testimony
55
New cards
Who was Richard Ivens?
A young man with an intellectual disability accused of rape and murder
56
New cards
Where did the Richard Ivens case occur?
Chicago
57
New cards
What did Richard Ivens confess to?
Rape and murder
58
New cards
Who reviewed Ivens’s interrogation records?
Hugo Münsterberg and William James
59
New cards
Why were Münsterberg and James asked to review the case?
At the request of Ivens’s lawyer
60
New cards
What was Münsterberg’s conclusion in the Ivens case?
The confession was false
61
New cards
Did Münsterberg believe Ivens committed the crime?
No
62
New cards
What was the court outcome in the Ivens case?
Ivens was found guilty and executed
63
New cards
How did the court treat psychological evidence in the Ivens case?
It was largely ignored
64
New cards
Who was Harry Orchard?
A man who confessed to killing the former governor of Idaho
65
New cards
What did Harry Orchard claim about the murder?
He acted on orders from a union boss
66
New cards
Who requested Münsterberg’s involvement in the Orchard case?
The prosecution
67
New cards
What did Münsterberg conclude about Orchard’s confession?
It was truthful
68
New cards
What was the court outcome for the union boss?
He was acquitted
69
New cards
Did Münsterberg’s findings strongly influence the court?
No
70
New cards
How did the public and media react to Münsterberg’s legal involvement?
With strong criticism
71
New cards
How was psychology portrayed in the media at the time?
As a scientific fad cheating justice
72
New cards
What did media coverage say about Münsterberg and William James in the Ivens case?
They made themselves and their science look ridiculous
73
New cards
How did the legal community react to Münsterberg?
With skepticism and opposition
74
New cards
What aspects of psychology did the legal profession resist?
Testimony, confessions, and credibility research
75
New cards
What book did Münsterberg publish in 1908?
On the Witness Stand
76
New cards
Why did Münsterberg write On the Witness Stand?
To argue psychology’s value to the legal system
77
New cards
What legal issues did Münsterberg argue psychology could help with?
Eyewitness testimony, false confessions, suggestibility, crime detection, and prevention
78
New cards
What was the structure of On the Witness Stand?
A collection of essays applying psychology to law
79
New cards
How was the book received by lawyers?
With increased backlash
80
New cards
Why did Münsterberg’s book increase criticism?
His confrontational writing style
81
New cards
How did Münsterberg describe the legal system?
Outdated and unscientific
82
New cards
What did Münsterberg argue lawyers relied on instead of psychology?
Common sense and instinct
83
New cards
What did Münsterberg say the law ignored?
Advances in experimental psychology
84
New cards
What psychological processes did Münsterberg believe law underestimated?
Memory, perception, judgment, and suggestibility
85
New cards
What role did Münsterberg believe psychology should play in law?
Improving accuracy and reducing intuition-based decisions
86
New cards
How did Münsterberg believe legal reform would occur?
Through public pressure, not voluntary change
87
New cards
Who was John Henry Wigmore?
A law professor at Northwestern University
88
New cards
What role did Wigmore play in response to Münsterberg?
He was a major critic
89
New cards
What did Wigmore publish in 1909?
A mock trial putting Münsterberg on trial
90
New cards
What was the outcome of Wigmore’s mock trial?
Münsterberg was found guilty of overclaiming
91
New cards
What satirical elements did Wigmore use?
April Fool’s date and Supreme Court of Wundt County
92
New cards
What was Wigmore’s main criticism?
Lack of empirical forensic psychology research
93
New cards
How did Wigmore view psychology’s readiness for law?
Not ready to contribute meaningfully
94
New cards
What was the immediate impact on forensic psychology in the U.S.?
Progress slowed and psychologists became cautious
95
New cards
Did forensic psychology eventually advance in the U.S.?
Yes
96
New cards
When did psychologists help open the first youth offender clinic?
1909
97
New cards
What development occurred in 1916?
Laboratories for pretrial psychological assessments
98
New cards
What change occurred in 1917?
Psychological testing for law enforcement selection
99
New cards
How did forensic psychology evolve after early resistance?
Through theory development and applied research
100
New cards
Who proposed Sheldon’s Constitutional Theory of Crime?
William Sheldon