Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
problems in new US left over from old country
debt, mercantilism, interior security
the cabinet
created by washington; a group of people who run different things in executive branch
not in constitution
Secretary of Treasury
handled money (taxes, tariffs, etc.)
originally Alexander Hamilton
Secretary of State
handles states, foreign policy, everything else
originally Thomas Jefferson
Secretary of War
oversaw daily military functions (president still over whole military)
Attorney General
handles enforcement of law
policies from First US Congress
tariff of 1789
judiciary act of 1789
tariff of 1789
established national gov.’s right to regulate trade and raise or lower taxes
sig: tariffs used to raise money until great depression
Judiciary Act of 1789
created national tiered court system
Supreme Courts → Circuit (Appeal) Courts → District Courts → State Courts
Chief Justice of Supreme Court
head of supreme court, calls session to order, has more say on appeals
Section 25 of Judiciary Act
establishes almost any act can appeal to SCOTUS
money and civil cases can go but are rarely seen
US is first country to do so
hamilton’s “Public Good and Elitism” philosophy
stated gov should not be selfish but should do things for the people, divided people into two groups:
elites (rich, entrepreneurs, business owners, political figures)
masses (everyone else)
elitist must be on board for social action or change will be very hard
debt in 1789
loans were at 15% of original value
elites bought farmer’s loans while they were waiting for gov to repay them
Funding (in Hamilton’s Funding & Assumption Plan)
government bought every IOU at their original value with government bonds
traded one big loan for the people’s little loans
gov only paid interest off in beginning
Assumption (in Hamilton’s Funding & Assumption Plan)
national government assumed/took on state debt
problems and compromise in Funding & Assumption
Jefferson threatened to remove assumption but agreed if capital city was in south, he’d ignore it
Powers of First Bank of the US
print money/ issue currency
store money
make loans to businesses
control interest rates @ other banks
significance of First Bank of US
started debate over constitution interpretation
created financial stability
strict construction
believed government could only do what is specifically written in constitution and nothing else
so national bank, cabinet, etc. were unconstitutional
loose construction
believed government should follow constitution but with reasonable room for interpretation
pointed to “Necessary and Proper” clause of constitution
significance of strict vs loose construction argument
still argued over today but under different name
dynamic between those in power and choice of interpretation still exists
ideas of Federalist Political Party
hamiltonian economics
high tariffs
more taxes
favored Northern, Urban environment
preferred Britain as foreign partner
ideas of Democratic - Republican Party
jefferson’s economics
low tariffs
less taxes
favored southern, rural environment
preferred France as foreign partnerf
election of 1792
Washington had to be convinced to run again
pres.: Washington
VP: John Adams
Whiskey Rebellion (1794)
Hamilton taxed the production and sale of whiskey, farmers began to rebel, but stopped at when Washington sent volunteer army
3 significances of Whiskey Rebellion
established national government’s ability to deal with internal disturbances
set precedent of how gov. would treat rebellions (send army or nat. guard)
showed new gov. and const. could and would enforce the law
Northwest Indian War (1785-95)
large coalition of Natives banded together to fight further American colonization of West, led to discovery that british troops were violating treaty by still occupying Western US
gave people reason to push for war
Jays Treaty (1794)
washington sent John Jay, who was not secretary of state, to prevent war with Britain:
british agreed to remove troops finally from US soil
brit. gave US favored nation status in regards to trade
3 outcomes of Jay’s Treaty
no promise from British to end impressment
everyone generally disliked treaty because it solved no issues
senate accepted treaty b/c only alternative was war w/ British
3 significances of Jay’s Treaty
did prevent war with british that US would’ve lost
first high criticism of washington as a president
step in formation/definition of political parties
Election of 1796
President: John Adams, Federalist
VP: Thomas Jefferson, Democratic Republican
first election where party affiliation mattered
Federalists controlled all 3 branches
XYZ Affair (1797)
set of latter between Adams and french ministers saying that in order to meet with Talleyrand:
US had to give french $10m dollar loan
US had to give personal gift to Talleyrand of $250k
Quasi War (1798-1800)
undeclared naval war between french and america
Convention of 1800
napolean, now ruling france, agreed with Adams to be friends/allies, promised free trade
origins of Alien and Sedition Acts
federalist party wanted to limit political influence of french immigrants and attack Democratic-Republican Party for anti-government press
Alien Friends Act
gave president power to deport any resident alien deemed dangerous to the safety and peace of US
never used, expired 1800
Alien Enemies Act
immigrants from a nation at war with US could be deported w/out cause
not used by Adams, but still exists today under different name in code of law
Sedition Act
criticizing federal government or president was a crime
aimed at democratic-republican press, was used numerous times
significance of Alien and Sedition Acts
gave president powers not in constitution
issues/acts controversial then and still today
biggest negative on Adam’s legacy/presidency/career
Virginia and Kentucky Resolution (1798)
Thomas Jefferson and James Madison met with Southern and Southwest states secretly to interpret constitution as response to Alien and Sedition Acts
Compact Theory
in creating and ratifying constitution, states gave up power to national government and wrote out specific powers for national gov. → states have power to interpret constitution
Nullification
declares that states can nullify a law through lack of enforcement if they find it unconstitutional
only worked if majority of states agreed
did not officially repeal law but removed law’s power
contract theory
opposing constitutional interpretation theory to compact theory; people wrote and ratified constitution → courts interpret through judicial review
favored by supreme court and national government
significances of Compact Theory and Nullification
despite being invalid, states kept trying (and failing) to use nullification
southern leaders based right to secede on compact theory
Election of 1800 Candidates
John Adams (Federalist, reelection)
Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr (D-R, trying to get Feds out of office)
Election of 1800 Results
Burr and Jefferson tied, Adams in third
tiebreaker goes to Fed House of Representatives, Hamilton broke deadlock by supporting Jefferson
Election of 1800 Significances
12th amendment refined electoral college
created ticket system where Pres. and VP run together
set precedent for peaceful transition of power
Adam’s Lame Duck Period
while waiting to leave office, Adams created Judicial Act of 1801 and filled new courts with Federalists, called Midnight Appointees
John Marshall
appointed Chief Justice of Supreme Court by John Adams (1801-1835)
one of best/most significant Chief Justices
Marbury v Madison overview
William Marbury was not delivered his commission to be a SC judge before Jefferson’s presidency b/c Jeff ordered Madison not to → Marbury sues for Writ of Mandamus to order Madison to deliver his SC Commission
3 Questions and Decisions of Marbury v. Madison
Did Marbury have the right to his commission? Yes
Did Marbury have a legal way to fix the issue? Yes, but Writ of Mand. was problematic b/c of high level officials
Is it proper for the SC to use a Writ of Mandamus on executive branch? No, gets rid of checks and balances within branches
Judicial Review
power of courts to interpret constitution
confirms contract theory
indirectly refutes Jefferson’s compact theory and nullification
significances of Marbury v Madison
established judicial review
indirect refute of compact theory and nullification
Jefferson’s biggest defeat as president
Louisiana Purchase (1803)
US worried abt losing right to Mississippi River, so they sent negotiators to France → bought entire Louisiana Territory for 15m despite only being prepared to buy New Orleans for 10m
why Napoleon sold Louisiana Territory
French had no use b/c they lost Haiti in a slave rebellion and didn’t want to lose land to British
4 significances of Louisiana Purchase
secured US right to Mississippi River and New Orleans for trade
doubled size of US
cheap; less than 3 cents an acre
example of how people act in vs out of power in reference to strict or loose construction
problems with British during Jefferson’s presidency
british tried to limit US trade w/ france
resumed impressment
Chesapeake Affair (1807)
Embargo Act of 1807
Chesapeak Affair (1807)
war almost caused because British ship broadsided US Chesapeake; 3 soldiers killed, 18 wounded, 4 impressed
Jefferson refused to declare war
Embargo Act of 1807
shut down all foreign shipping of US goods to other countries
contributed to economic depression but prevented war, reduced impressment
Election of 1804
Jefferson (D-R), winner
Charles Pinckney (F), first Pres. to loose home state
Hamilton-Burr Duel (11 July 1804)
Hamilton and Burr got into a press war, so Hamilton challenges Burr to a duel to “satisfy honor”
typically, duels meant shooting at/around each other but Hamilton was shot and killed by Burr
significances of Hamilton-Burr duel
the VP of the US shot and killed someone
death of hamilton triggered death of federalist party
Election of 1808
James Madison (D-R), winner
Charles Pinckney (F)
uniting traits of Warhawks
young politicians who couldn’t have participated in revolution or constitution
looked forwards not backwards
first generation from W of Appalachian Mountains
wanted war w/ British
Henry Clay (Kentucky)
notable Warhawk politician nicknamed “Great Compromiser” and said to be the Jefferson/Burr of future generations who ran with set of nationalist ideals
prevented 3 civil wars
American System
John C. Calhoun (South Carolina)
Warhawk politician who started as a nationalist and moved to be the most vocal defender of slavery in South
causes of War of 1812
problems in the west, such as Tecumseh’s War
Tecumseh’s War (1810-1813)
Tecumseh, leader of Shawnee Nation, formed 10+ native nations alliance w/ brother Tenskwatawa, religious leader, with goal to remove whites from region and take over lost land in NW
US General William Henry Harrison
sent in as governor of Indiana and military general to deal w/ Natives, pushed for one big battle
Tecumseh’s visit to South (1811)
try to recruit natives to join war in North, put Tenskwatawa in charge with orders not to attack Harrison head on
Battle of Tippecanoe (7 November 1811)
Tenskwatawa planned ambush of Harrison but Harrison rallies troops to demolish Tensk. and Natives
most Natives killed, Native headquarters captured
sig: Harrison found British supplies and support for Natives
significance of Tecumseh’s War
last large-scale native conflict in US, permanently removed British influence
Creek War (1813-14)
civil war among Creek people
Red Stick Creek supported war w/US
Lower Creek against war w/US
Red Stick started attacking US at same time of Creek War, so US got involved, start of Andrew Jackson’s military fame
Treaty of Fort Jackson (9 August 1814)
ended creek war; entire creek people gave up 23m acres of land (Jackson didn’t care about lower creek, who allied w/US)
significance of Creek War
massive loss of land effects creek and all other natives in south
2nd war US was fighting while also fighting British in war of 1812
began Andrew Jackson’s rise to fame
Election of 1812
James Madison (D-R)
Dewitt Clinton (Fed.)
Fed lost but changed how campaigning works through individualized/locational messages
fighting in War of 1812
90% small fights in woods 1812-13
18134, British captured and burned capitol building
Federalist Opposition to war of 1812
believed french were enemy, saw war as bad for atlantic trade
purpose of Hartford Convention (Dec 1814-Jan 1815)
Federalists met to discuss how Madison was running war, how to end war, and limit D-R power
rumors of New England considering secession from US
poor timing because US was trying to make treaty w/ British
Hartford Convention demands
repeal 3/5ths compromise
limit length of trade embargos
set one-term limit for presidents
president must be from different state than president before the,
change voting process for congress
Treaty of Ghant (24 Dec 1814)
ended war of 1812, set “status quo ante bellum” or put things same as before, british chose to pay 12m instead of returning stolen slaves
no admissions of guilt, promises, land or money exchanged
took one month for news to hit US
Battle of New Orleans (8 January 1815)
General Andrew Jackson led defense of New Orleans and easily defeated British
Jackson was now very well known
Results of the War of 1812
british gained and lost nothing
americans gained and lost nothing
native nations gained nothing, lost people and land
Federalist gained a bad reputation as traitors, lost support from certain states
Significances of the War of 1812
final nail for Federalist party
considered a 2nd revolution
election of 1816
James Monroe (D-R), won
Rufus King (F)
election of 1820
James Monroe (D-R) vs no one
New Republicans
party led by Clay and Calhoun, former Warhawks
younger and innovative
ideas mirroring Hamilton’s (manufacturing, National bank, higher tarrifs)
Henry Clay’s American System
policy based around loose construction theory w/ high tariffs, internal improvements, and national bank that focused on doing more for people
Panic of 1819
economic depression after 2nd Bank of United States due to over speculation of land
government did nothing (laissez-fair) and panic resolved itself in four years
significances of Panic of 1819
first major economic crisis for US
start of sectionalism in US National Politics due to how different parties reacted to crisis
Missouri Crisis (1819-1820)
Missouri Territory applied for statehood as a slave state, which would’ve upset slave v free balance, so Tallmadge proposed his amendment but it was rejectd
opposition/support of slavery was for political reasons, not moral
3/5ths amendment gave slave state senate control
Missouri Compromise (1820)
Missouri admitted as slave state w/out Tallmadge amendment
Maine admitted as free state (maine existed already as part of massachussets)
created 36 30 line (any new territory N of line must be slavery free)
significance of Missouri Crisis/Compromise
first time sates clashed over whether congress has right to restrict expansion of slavery to new territories
36 30 line was seen as permanent solution to slavery question
showed continual influence and significance of 3/5ths
origin of southern sectionalism regarding slavery
Election of 1824
four D-R candidates ran, no one won majority vote (although A. Jackson had most), decision went to House of Reps→ Quincy Adams wins
Split of the D-R Party
National Republicans (J. Quincy Adams and Henry Clay w/ American System, broke down 8 yrs later into Whig Party)
Democrats (Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren w/ policy to stop Henry Clay)
Tallmidge Amendment (1819)
proposed change to Missouri statehood bill with goal of gradual abolition, stated:
No new slaves could be brought to Missouri once Missouri becomes a state
Any existing slave under age of 25 must be freed when they turned 25
passed house but not senate
problems with Clay’s internal improvements
states wanted control of projects inside their borders but wouldn’t have that if they didn’t fund them
strict-loose construction: const. didnt give government power for those projects
Problems of American System
older D-R thought it was unjust bc of strict construction view
more power to National government
mostly benefitted New England
significance of American System
Nationalism
Cohesion of Ideas
example of strict vs loose construction debate (view changed once in power)
Clay stuck to nationalist ideas which was not good for winning elections
McCullough v Maryland overview
James McCullough, a bank cashier, issued money not taxed by bank of Maryland, so Maryland sued him, case appealed to Supreme Court