1/131
psych, yikes
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
learned helplessness
feeling powerless due to repeated exposure to uncontrollable events
learned helplessness
associated with an external locus of control.
observational learning
learning by watching others
modeling
imitating the behavior of a model
albert bandura
theorized social learning theory with his bobo doll experiment
bobo doll experiment
children imitated observed aggressive behavior
classical conditioning terms
extinction, generalization, spontaneous recovery, stimulus discrimination
extinction
the conditioned response weakens when the conditioned stimulus is no longer paired with the unconditioned stimulus
generalization
responding to stimuli similar to the conditioned stimulus
spontaneous recovery
reappearance of an extinguished response after rest
stimulus discrimination
distinguishing between the conditioned stimulus and similar stimuli
ivan pavlov
studied classical conditioning
albert bandura
studied social learning theory
edward thorndike
studied law of effect
bf skinner
studied operant conditioning
fear
can be classically conditioned
little albert experiment
a child was conditioned to fear a white rat by pairing it with a loud noise
continuous reinforcement
reward every time (teaching dog sitting)
partial reinforcement
variable ratio/interval (maintain dog knowing how to sit)
positive reinforcement
add something pleasant
negative reinforcement
remove something unpleasant
positive punishment
add something unpleasant
negative punishment
remove something pleasant
unconditioned stimulus (US)
triggers a natural response
unconditioned response (UR)
natural reaction to US
neutral stimulus (NS)
doesn’t trigger a response initially
conditioned stimulus (CS)
was NS, now triggers response after learning
conditioned response (CR)
learned response to CS
associative learning
learning that two events are connected (stimulus-stimulus or behavior-consequence), applies to both classical and operant conditioning
latent learning
learning occurs but isn’t shown until incentives (like rats in maze w/o reward but navigates quick w/ food introduction)
punishment
can cause fear, aggression, or resentment
positive reinforcement
rewarding positive behaviors is better for shaping behavior
primary reinforcers
satisfy biological needs
secondary reinforcers
learned rewards
biological predispositions
some behaviors are easier to learn due to biology
insight
sudden realization of a solution
operant conditioning
focuses on the consequences of actions
shaping
teaching by reinforcing small steps toward a desired behavior
reinforcement schedules
fixed/variable ratio/interval
fixed ratio
reward after a set number of actions
variable ratio
reward after an unpredictable number of actions
fixed interval
reward after a set time
variable interval
reward after unpredictable time intervals
variable ratio
mots effective reinforcement schedules
independent variable (IV)
factor manipulated by the researcher (cause)
dependent variable (DV)
factor measured, depending on the IV (effect)
experimental research
research method with most control as it manipulates variables and uses random assignment
random assignment
ensures groups are created by chance, minimizing pre-existing differences and increasing validity (unbiased)
correlation coefficient (coco)
measures strength and direction of a relationship (-1 to +1)
stronger coco
closer to + or - 1
weaker coco
closer to 0
positive coco
both variables increase together
negative coco
one increases, other decreases
scatter plot
graph showing data points to visualize relationships
positive correlation
variables move in the same direction
negative correlation
variables move in opposite directions
research methods
non experimental :surveys, case studies, naturalistic observation, meta-analysis, correlation
experimental: experiments
nonexperimental research
descriptive with no variable manipulation
experimental research
manipulates variables and uses random assignment to determine cause and effect
ethical guidelines
informed consent, confidentiality, debriefing, protection from harm
informed consent
participates must agree after being fully informed
confidentiality
protect participant data and identities
debriefing
explain the study afterward, especially if deception was used
protection from harm
minimize risks
random sampling
selecting participants randomly for generalizability
random assignemnt
assigning participants to groups by chance to reduce bias
placebo
fake treatment given to control groups
placebo effect
changes occur because participants believe they received the treatment
framing
how information is presented affects decisions
effortful processing
requires attention and effort
automatic processing
happens unconsciously
echoic memory
auditory sensory memory lasting 3-4 seconds
iconic memory
visual sensory memory lasting .5 seconds
retroactive interference
new information interferes with old memories
proactive interference
old information interferes with learning new information
PORN
proactive old retroactive new (mnemonic)
brocas area
speech production
wernickes area
language comprehension
aphasia
language impairment
brocas aphasia
trouble speaking, comprehension intact
wernickes aphasia
fluent but nonsensical speech, poor comprehension
convergent thinking
finding one correct solution
divergent thinking
generating multiple ideas or solutions
serial position effect
we remember items at the beginning (primacy effect) and end (recency effect) of a list better than the middle
primacy effect
remembering things at the beginning of lists better
recency effect
remembering things at the end of lists better
mental set
using the same problem-solving approach repeatedly
fixation
inability to see a problem from a new perspective
short term memory (STM)
temporary, holds 7 items
long term memory (LTM)
permanent storage (includes procedural, semantic, and episodic memory)
procedural memory
skills
semantic memory
facts
episodic memories
personal experiences
groupthink
desire for harmony leads to poor decisions
group polarization
group discussions strengthen existing opinions
informational social influence
conforming to gain accurate information
normative social information
conforming to fit in or gain approval
scapegoat theory
blaming others for personal problems
prejudice
preconceived negative attitudes toward a group
just world phenomenon
belief that people get what they deserve