[Paper 1] How to answer

[Elizabeth] Q1 (What can be learnt from Source A and B about…)

SI

STATE what is in the source.

INFERENCE: Give an inference.

[Elizabeth] Q2 (To what extent does this source accurately reflect…)

CKOPC

CONTENT: What is the source saying?

KNOWLEDGE 2x to agree + disagree with the source.

ORIGIN: Who wrote & when?

PURPOSE: Why did they write this?

CONCLUSION: Answer the question.

[Elizabeth] Q3 (Why was … significant in …?)

IMC

INTRODUCTION: Introduce issue/BG knowledge.

MAIN: Main paragraph explaining why this was significant.

CONCLUSION: Summarise main reasons.

[Elizabeth] Q4 (Explain the connections between TWO of the following that are to do with …)

IEDC

INTRODUCTION: Introduce topic/points. Point out a connection

EXPLAIN: Explain connections.

DEVELOP: Develop connections.

CONCLUSION: Demonstrate a clear connection.

[Elizabeth] Q5 (How far do you agree with this interpretation of … in the Elizabethan times?)

CK+OPK-C

CONTENT: State interpretation.

KNOWLEDGE+: 2x Knowledge FOR interpretation.

ORIGIN: Who has written it? When?

PURPOSE: What is the medium? How is this significant?

KNOWLEDGE-: 2x Knowledge AGAINST interpretation.

CONCLUSION: Answer the question.

[USA] Q1 (Use source A and your own knowledge.)

SC-KO

SOURCE: What can you see?

CONTEXT: What was happening?

KNOWLEDGE: 3 points of knowledge.

OUTCOME: What happened next?

[USA] Q2 (What is the purpose of source B?)

J-SA

JUDGEMENT: Give your opinion.

SOURCE: What can you see?

AUTHORSHIP: Evaluate authorship.

[USA] Q3 (Which interpretation supports the view?)

IS-EJ (Ice Age)

IDENTIFY the interpretation which supports.

SUPPORT interpretations with 2 points of knowledge.

EVALUATE different views.

JUDGE how they are they different.

[USA] Q4 (Which source is the most useful?)

SK-AJ (Sketch)

STATE how both are useful.

KNOWLEDGE: 2 points of knowledge.

AUTHORSHIP should be evaluated.

JUDGE which is most useful.

[USA] Q5 (How far do you agree with the interpretation?)

A-AD-J

AGREE with the interpretation.

AUTHORSHIP: evaluate authorship.

DISAGREE about atleast 2 factors.

JUDGEMENT: how far do you agree?