Ethics - Privacy

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/13

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

14 Terms

1
New cards

Privacy as a Philosophical and Legal Concept

Defined as a “boundary that shields the individual from others.” It is crucial for self-development and the establishment of human relationships.

2
New cards

Common Law Basis

The principle that previous court rulings in similar cases serve as a guide for judges in future cases (precedent). This establishes the legal foundation for privacy rights.

3
New cards

Individualistic Focus on Privacy

The tendency to view privacy primarily as a right or boundary of the single person. The text notes that this focus has often obscured policy (i.e., made it harder to craft broad policy solutions)

4
New cards

Technological Advances in Privacy Invasion

Refers to the increasing capability of technology (e.g., pervasive sensors, mass data collection, AI analytics) to erode the traditional boundaries of privacy.

5
New cards

Contextual Integrity (Core Idea)

The framework argues that privacy is not about secrecy, but about the appropriateness of information flow as governed by the established norms of a specific context (e.g., medical, financial).

6
New cards

Key Components of Contextual Integrity

The critical elements that define the appropriate flow of information: Context, Actors (sender/recipient), Transmission Principles (rules), and Information Norms (type of data appropriate for the context)

7
New cards

Violation of Contextual Integrity

Occurs when information is transmitted, collected, or used in a way that violates the established norms or transmission principles that govern that specific context.

8
New cards

Contextual Integrity's Response to "Nothing to Hide"

It argues that privacy is not about hiding shameful/illegal acts (secrecy). The harm comes from the violation of contextual norms and the loss of control over how information is used, regardless of whether the information is 'innocent.'

9
New cards

Surveillance Capitalism

A new economic order that claims human experience as free raw material for data extraction and translation into behavioral data. These data are used to create prediction products that are then sold in behavioral futures markets.

10
New cards

Behavioral Surplus

The data collected that exceeds what is necessary for a product or service to function (e.g., Facebook needs some data to deliver posts, but it collects much more to predict future actions). This surplus is the core raw material for surveillance capitalism.

11
New cards

The Requirimiento

Used as a metaphor for the non-negotiable terms of service users "agree" to. Historically, the Requirimiento was a Spanish declaration read to indigenous people demanding their submission, which served as a legal justification for conquest if they refused. In surveillance capitalism, the terms of service similarly demand submission to data extraction as a condition for using a product, justifying the capture of behavioral surplus.

12
New cards

Valuations of Privacy

Different approaches to assessing the worth of privacy, which can include its intrinsic worth or its instrumental worth (e.g., for supporting democracy or individual autonomy).

13
New cards

Legal Precedents

The process where previous court rulings in similar cases serve as a guide for judges in future cases. This is the basis of Common Law in defining and protecting privacy rights.

14
New cards

Anti-essentialist Arguments (on Privacy)

The philosophical view that privacy does not have a single, fixed, universal essence or definition. It supports the idea that privacy's meaning is contextual (a view aligned with Nissenbaum)