1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
why is classification needed
diversity on Earth is vast
to make sense of the huge amount of species, scientists organise them into logical groups, which helps understand relationships between organisms
organisms are placed in groups according to their
similar characteristics
evolutionary origins
taxon
a group of organisms that have been given a group name by scientists based on their shared features
taxonomic hierarchy of taxa
Domain, Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species
difficulties with traditional hierarchy of taxa
unclear how populations should be grouped into species
even if a species is agreed on, taxonomists disagree over what rank the group should have
these uncertainties are the result of the gradual divergence of species and large groups over time
why is a fixed ranking of taxa arbitrary
doesn’t reflect the gradation of variation
set up arbitrarily by humans because it’s a neat way of organising life into groups
cladistics offers an alternative approach to classification (example of paradigm shift of scientific theories)
paradigm shift
a fundamental change in approach
cladistics
the branch of science where scientists put organisms into clades
clade
a group of organisms that have all descended from a common ancestor
can be large or small, not all members have to be alive
advantages of classifying using cladistics
ensures that groups of organisms are close evolutionary relatives, rather than arbitrary groups that happen to look similar
characteristics within a clade are often inherited from a common ancestor, so likely to be shared and can be predicted
how to place organisms into clades
most objective method is using sequencing data
the more similar the sequences, the closer related the species
morphology
species that share a more recent common ancestor are more likely to share similar morphologies
this method is more subjective
more closely related species share large numbers of derived traits
sequencing data & the molecular clock
the number of differences between sets of sequence data provide information on how closely related the species are
they can also provide a quantitative estimate on when the species diverged
differences in sequence data are due to mutations
the number of mutations give an indication of the amount of time passed since the species diverged
the constant rate of mutation is called the molecular clock
why the molecular clock is only an estimate
mutation rate can be affected by factors such as:
population size
generation time
selection pressures
cladograms
evolutionary trees that show probable order of divergence and likely evolutionary history
information used to build cladograms come from base or amino acid sequence data
parsimony analysis
states that the simplest explanation is the most likely
cladograms are constructed using available evidence on the basis of parsimony
analysis of cladograms
the point at which 2 branches separate is a node, nodes on a cladogram represent common ancestors
a node immediately adjacent to a pair of clades shows that these 2 clades share a recent common ancestor
the root of a cladogram is found at its base, represents the common ancestor of all the organisms within the cladogram
the terminal branch represents the most recent species in evolutionary lineage
reclassification & cladistics
cladistics can be used to investigate whether the classification of groups corresponds to evolutionary relationships
e.g the reclassification of the figwort family
why organisms may be reclassified
organisms used to be classified based on shared physical characteristics
shared physical characteristics are not due to common ancestry
those characteristics may be analogous (a result of convergent evolution)
theories and other scientific knowledge claims can eventually be falsified
when new evidence that no longer supports the theory is found, it needs to be changed
e.g the figwort family, similarities in morphology due to convergent evolution rather than common ancestry suggested a classification that by cladistics has proven to be false
domains
the science of taxonomy has frequently changed to match the latest discoveries about features of organisms
recent (1977) rRNA analysis has shown that there are 2 distinct groups of prokaryotes, leading to a shift in taxonomic thinking, and the beginning of a 3 domain system
largest taxonomic group is now known as a domain
3 domains
archaea, eubacteria, eukaryota