1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Where was David Ricardo born?
London, United Kingdom
When was David Ricardo born?
April 18, 1772
David Ricardo life
grew up Jewish
worked for his father at 14
was Jewish —> turned Unitarian to marry a quaker girl
dad didn’t approve so he had to start his business at 22 from scratch and becomes very rich (also from the stock market)
watched events and predicted big changes in the stock market
good friends w/ Malthus even though they disagreed about everything
loved to host
differences between Smith & Ricardo
Ricardo recognizes class conflict, Smith was more optimistic that everyone would benefit from the self-regulated market mechanism
Ricardo saw the differences in the quality of life between different classes
Malthus’ Theory of Population
thought there was too many people in the world
population will grow quicker than resources (food & land) so people will dies from famine, hunger, disease, and humanity will be limited by nature’s scarcity
Malthus said it wasn’t bad to let poor people die off to regulate the population but considered himself a humanitarian
this made sense in England during late 1700s because there was a lack of technological advancements compared to today
birth rates have decreased in modern times because of birth control
fertility gave you social prestige back then
Ricardo’s Principles of Political Economy and Taxation
published in 1817
land rent grows as population increases
assigns stereotypes to the different social classes
said that there is no individuality in these classes and there are different behaviors to be associated with different social classes
not people “prototypes'“ and not living “following laws of behavior”
thought factory workers were “undifferentiated units of economic energy”
thought workers were commodities and whatever system we use to determine the price of things should be used to determine their subsistence wages
thought they lacked self-control and would have babies galore
business owner’s entire purpose is to accumulate wealth
believes their job is not easy because they are in constant, cut-throat competition and their profit is determined by the wages they pay
landowners gained rent at everyone else’s expense
they did not have to worry about competition or population
not all land is equally productive but all land will sell
rent comes from the difference of the unproductive land’s profit and the productive land’s profit
he used Malthus’ Law of Population to further his theory
if population continues to increase and demand starts to outweighs supply…
people will have to buy more land to cultivate more grain…
the land will not be good quality because all the good quality land is taken…
the price of production goes up on those unproductive plots of land and so will the selling price (because the worst quality land determines the price of the grain)…
if the price of grain goes up, so does subsistence wage because the worker needs more money to accommodate the increasing price of grain
Historical context of Ricardo’s theories
profit (for business owners) and rent (for aristocrats) was 56% of invested capital
during Industrial Revolution
rapid industrial growth but class conflict
aristocrats annoyed that the business owners are complaining about the price of food
people ended up relying on exports to eat for a reasonable price
Corn Laws
aristocrats were not fond of people exporting goods because it hurt their pockets
hurting the working class and industry but benefiting landowners
War with Napoleon
brought about famine paired with the Corn Laws
all this caused him to be pessimistic about economics compared to Adam Smith
Corn Laws
in early stages of the Industrial Revolution
high tariffs government put on international grain so no one would buy from countries with really low prices because it is cheaper to make grain there
quadrupled the price of a bushel of wheat
showed how much power aristocrats had in comparison to business owners
business owner did not like the tariff because it meant they had to pay more wages to accommodate the number of workers
Labor Theory of Value
the amount of labor that goes into something determines its value
Concept of Subsistence Wage
landowners wanted to give the working class enough to buy the food that they needed (& modest shelter/clothing) and nothing more
Ricardo’s Theory hot words
landowners
rent
bourgeoisie
profit
workers
salary
Connection between Malthus + Keynes
both did not believe the market naturally fixes itself
Malthus said that population grows faster than food/resources so capitalism does not equal permanent prosperity
Kanes argued that capitalism is not self-regulated because it can go into periods of stagnation without intervention
when people are financially insecure, they stop spending and businesses don’t invest so the economy stalls
to Malthus, only capitalists could save, so saving = spending because capitalist save to invest back into their businesses but Keynes recognized that proletariat could save too
Ricardo on class conflict
understood that the same economy affected the social classes differently
thought only the landlord really gained
could still collect rent if they neglected there land
Ricardo understood the landlords were putting in work but they assumed high profits than any other class for the same amount/less work
(Malthus disagreed with Ricardo and thought the landlords’ rent was well deserved because of their wisdom and talent)
worker is forever condemned to subsistence wage
and Ricardo believed the working class could not stop having children
the capitalist found his risks were in vain
saving and investing was for nothing as wages were high and profits were small
Why does Heilbroner say that Ricardo’s theory did not hold up?
workers are not uncontrollably having babies, in fact industrialization has decreased human reproduction
industralization has made it hard to rely on agriculture