1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Evidence people care about inequality
Dictator Game
Public Goods Game
MRI (2010)
Possible reasons
signalling to others we are prosocial
reciprocity preference
fear that inequality leads to bad social consequences
Probably evolutionary process → human survival
Inequality
Occurs when there’s a difference between groups of individuals on one or more dimensions (height, income, food)
inequality ≠ inequity
inequity when inequality is deemend inequitable (unfair, unjust)
inequity → inequality
inequality is necessary, but not sufficient for inequity
ex. grades in class
relative view
inequality is about proportional differences between incomes
T10/B50
Implications: global inequality decreased in the world since 1980’s because income ratios between rich and poor have fallen, even though everyone got richer
absolute view
inequality is about absolute income gaps
T10-B50
Implications: global inequality has increased over the past 40 years, because the absolute income gap has grown
3 measures of inequality
Income share ratios
Income gap
Gini coefficient derived from the Lorenz Curve
Lorenz Curve
plots the share of total income held by the poorest percent of the population
the lower the curve, the more unequal distribution
45* = perfect equality
Limited/incomplete view from focusing only on income inequality
people find inequalities from circumstances UNFAIR, and from ambition FAIR
Income is only one dimension of inequality
Wealth
wealth > income
Health
Education
Life chances
Opportunities
Access to public goods and services