1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Deontology
The right action is defined in terms of following one’s duties rather than maximizing good consequences
(Solves problem with maximizing happiness in utilitarianism by not looking at consequences)
The good will
The will of a person who is good
a good person is a person who does the right thing with the right motivation
Kant’s Ethics: Reason
He argues that moral motivation has to do with our reasons for action
the key to morality according to Kant rests in our autonomy, our nature as rational self governing free agents
Good without qualification (and the 3 things about good will that makes it so)
Kant argues that good will is the only thing that can be called good without qualification
the good will has intrinsic value
The good will is not good because of what it can do
The good will is good in itself
The good will is inherently good as it does not aim to do bad things
Motivators of the good will
The good will is unconditionally good because of the nature of the good will
the good will is good because it is motivated by the idea of duty (duty: our moral obligations)
The good will is motivated by morality
The motive of duty
A person motivated by duty will do the right thing regardless of circumstance
it is only when we act for the sake of duty that out action has moral worth
Misconception about the motive of duty
People think Kant believes that moral action is cold and distant → we should not feel good about doing the right thing (self-interest)
But really, Kant’s point is that one of our motives must be the motive of duty if out action is to have moral worth
we can still be sympathetic and feel good from doing the right thing, as long as it’s not the only thing motivating us