7.1 Intentional Torts

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/53

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

54 Terms

1
New cards

Battery Elements

  1. Intent to make harmful or offensive contact to another person or anything connected to him

  2. That actual contact

2
New cards

A person is holding a briefcase and a football while sitting in his car. Is there liability for battery if someone intentionally makes harmful or offensive contact with the car?

Yes (anything physically connected to that person that you intentionally make harmful or offensive contact with leads to liability for a battery)

3
New cards

T/F: A purely accidental contact that is harmful and not offensive can constitute a battery.

F (NEED intent)

4
New cards

Battery

Offensive contact is offensive to whom?

a reasonable person

5
New cards

Assault Definition

Intentionally causing reasonable apprehension of an imminent harmful or offensive contact.

6
New cards

Assault

"apprehension" means what?

awareness

7
New cards

Assault

"imminent" harm means what?

immediate

8
New cards

Assault

Is actual contact required for an assault to occur?

No

9
New cards

Assault

  • How will you know if it's a reasonable apprehension?

  • How will you know if it's imminent?

The facts will tell you.

10
New cards

Assault

When you see a gray area in the facts—like whether there was reasonable apprehension or an imminent harmful or offensive contact—what do you do?

Pick the answer most closely related to the gray area because that’s what’s being tested—the issue is your ability to identify the gray area in the first place, not to figure out yes or no.

11
New cards

Trespass to chattel definition

Intentionally interfering with P using his personal property

12
New cards

The tort of trespass to chattel involves [..1..] interference or [..2..] harm to personal property.

temporary, minor

13
New cards

In a trespass to chattel claim, the defendant is liable for the […] caused by the interference.

actual damages


Look for:

  • Diminished Value of the Chattel

  • Loss of Use

  • Cost to Remedy

  • Economic Losses: like lost business opportunities, such as lost rental income if commercial property (like equipment) was unusable due to the trespass.

  • Bodily Harm

14
New cards

Trespass to chattels

How will you know what the actual use, damage, or harm is to the property?

They'll tell you.

15
New cards

Trespass to chattels

What are they generally testing you on?

damages

16
New cards

Conversion definition

Intentionally interfering with the use of another's property, causing the it to be destroyed, lost, or gone

  • (i.e. converted because you're never getting it back)

17
New cards

Conversion

Does D need to have some sort of evil intent to destroy?

No.

Could be taking your phone to make a call, dropping it and destroying it

18
New cards

Conversion damages are what amount?

FMV at conversion

19
New cards

Conversion damages: how will you know how much it was worth at the time of the conversion?

They'll tell you

20
New cards

The distinction between trespass to chattel and conversion is what?

Seriousness of the interference

21
New cards

Trespass to land definition

Intentionally and physically entering another’s land

22
New cards

T/F: To be liable for trespass to land, a defendant must know they are on someone else's property.

F

23
New cards

Trespass to Land

Is damage to the literal physical land required?

No

24
New cards

IIED elements

  1. Intentional or reckless conduct

  2. That is extreme/outrageous

  3. Causing severe emotional distress

——————————————————————

  1. i/r

  2. e/o

  3. sed

25
New cards

IIED

Reckless conduct means acting with […], meaning D knew or should have known his conduct would cause distress.

malice

26
New cards

IIED: Physical harm required?

No


  1. i/r

  2. e/o

  3. SED

27
New cards

IIED Bystanders

Path 1: Close Family Member

  • Close family member of victim

  • Present at the scene

  • Severe emotional distress


Path 2: Any Bystander

  • Present at the scene

  • Severe emotional distress

  • Emotional distress resulted in bodily harm

28
New cards

IIED Bystander Case Theory #2

Any bystander who suffers PHYSICAL harm.

29
New cards

False imprisonment definition

Intentionally confining plaintiff to a bounded area

While plaintiff is aware of the confinement.

30
New cards

The "bounded area" element of false imprisonment requires that there be no [...] means of escape.

reasonable

31
New cards

T/F: A person can be liable for false imprisonment even if the plaintiff was unaware of the confinement.

F (the plaintiff MUST be aware of the confinement)

32
New cards

Shopkeeper's Privilege

The merchant's detention must be reasonable 3x:

  1. …

  2. … and

  3. …

  1. suspicion

  2. manner

  3. time

33
New cards

Negligent trespass to land—elements

  1. Negligently entering

  2. another’s land

  3. causing damage

34
New cards

Negligent trespass to land

What happens if you negligently drive onto someone’s property but you don't cause any damage to the property?

No liability

35
New cards
<p>NIED elements</p>

NIED elements

  1. Negligent conduct

  2. Plaintiff in zone of danger

  3. Severe emotional distress

  4. Severe PHYSICAL harm

<ol><li><p>Negligent conduct</p></li><li><p>Plaintiff in zone of danger</p></li><li><p>Severe emotional distress</p></li><li><p>Severe <strong>PHYSICAL </strong>harm</p></li></ol><p></p>
36
New cards

NIED: how will you know if plaintiff was in the zone of danger?

They’ll tell you.

37
New cards

NIED: Can P recover for severe emotional distress alone?

No! (physical harm required)

38
New cards

NIED Bystander

Requirement for bystander recovery

Same as IIED Close Family Member Bystander

39
New cards

A defendant who negligently mishandles a [..1..] is liable for the emotional distress of surviving family members, even if the family members don’t suffer [..2..]

corpse

physical harm.

40
New cards

A plaintiff's […] to the defendant's conduct is a complete defense to an intentional tort.

consent

41
New cards

Consent can be [..1..] (given in words) or [..2..] (inferred from conduct or circumstances).

express, implied

42
New cards

Consent: defendant's conduct must not […] the scope of the consent.

exceed

43
New cards

Self-defense requires what belief?

reasonable belief someone will hurt you

44
New cards

Self-defense justifies the use of what?

Proportionate force

45
New cards

Defense of others—requirement

Reasonable belief it's necessary to defend someone

46
New cards

T/F: A homeowner may use deadly force to stop a thief from stealing their car.

F (defending property → deadly force)

47
New cards

Defense of property—essential bullet points (3)

  • Reasonable force allowed

  • No deadly force unless deadly force is thrust upon you

  • Reasonable belief in preventing the bad thing to your property

48
New cards

Defense of property: I can't use deadly force, unless

deadly force is thrust upon me

49
New cards

Necessity typically relates to what torts?

trespass to land

trespass to chattel

50
New cards

Private Necessity

There's no other action for you to take. You have to come onto someone’s land out of necessity to save your [..1..] or [..2..] from serious harm.

person, property

51
New cards

If you successfully assert private necessity for trespass, you are still liable for […]

actual damages caused to the property

52
New cards

Public necessity allows a person to enter another's land to avert an […]

imminent public disaster

53
New cards

If you successfully assert public necessity for trespass, you are NOT liable for […]

ANY damage to property

54
New cards

Never apply a defense to an intentional tort unless the question does what?

Asks you about a defense