SCOTUS case- Marbury V. Madison

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/9

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

1 out of the 13 SCOTUS case

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

10 Terms

1
New cards
Decision year
1803
2
New cards
Important vocabulary and definitions
Judaical Review- declaring something unconstitutional
3
New cards
Constitutional Text(s) or Amendment(s) in Question
Article III- Judicial
Judiciary Act- Congress gives power to SCOTUS (supreme court of the U.S.A)
4
New cards
What are the big Issue(s)/Question(s) of the case
Does Marbury have to his commission, and he sue the federal government for it?
Does the SCOTUS have the authority to order the delivery of the commission?
5
New cards
Describe what happened to make this issue go all the way to the Supreme Court.
John Adams (Federalist) was about to leave office, replaced Thomas Jefferson (Anti-Federalist), and Adams made a lot of appointments at the last minute. Marbury's appointment was delayed and he never got it.
6
New cards
Plaintiff- (1st)
What issues were the plaintiff wanting to resolve?
Wanted his commission delivered and because of the judiciary Act because of the judiciary Act of 1789 the court had the authority to deliver the commission.
7
New cards
Defendant- (2nd)
Why did the defendant not agree with the plaintiff?
Power to enforce should remain with executive, and Jefferson should be able to make his own appointments.
8
New cards
Was is unanimous vote?
Yes
9
New cards
Majority/ Unanimous Opinion
Judiciary Act (1789) was unconstitutional because congress gave power to court they weren't suppose to have. This decision takes power away from the judicial branch.
10
New cards
Explain the Significance of the Ruling
The court does not see itself as the enforcer of the laws. The enforcement of the laws is with the executive branch. The court's role is to interpret the laws, and by interpreting the court can declare if the law is unconstitutional or constitutional. Basically this allows the court to have th power of Judicial Review.