1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What is the bill of rights?
The first 10 amendments of the constitution
history of the constitution
7 articles
27 amendments
started with the articles of confederation. it gave too much power to the states and didn’t give the fed. gov. taxing rights
the language is vague - open to interpretation, this is why it has lasted so long
1st amendment
freedom of speech, religion, press, and assembly
4th amendment
the protection of search and seizure
the gov./police must need consent, an arrest warrant, or probable cause to search
exceptions to the 4th amendment is you don’t always need a search warrant
protects people not places
5th amendment
the right to a grand jury
double jeopardy clause (cannot be put on trial for the same crime twice)
to protect self-incrimination - it is up to the state to prove guilt
6th amendment
the right to a fair and speedy trial
the right to counsel
the right to heard in front of a jury
14th amendment
due process - stops the gov. from infringing on your rights without evidence or strong reasoning.
5 parts of the Declaration of Independence
structure of the Constitution
separation of powers
powers of congress
president
judiciary
What is an appeal
when you take your case to a higher level of court to try and reverse your conviction
what is a motion
a legal document that is formally requesting the court to make a decision on something
Make up of the US Supreme Court
9 judges
compelling gov. intrest
the gov implementing certain policies in the interest of protecting the constitution
exclusionary rule
prevents the gov. From using most evidence gathered if it's in violation of the US constitution. It is not an individual right, it only applies to where it is needed.
Boyd v. US
Weeks v. US
Wolf v. CO
Mapp v Ohio
where do the power of arrest comes from?
the constitution
CI (Aguilar- Spinelli) two prong test
reliability of the informant and the information that they are providing
not used on a federal level, overruled by Illinois v. Gates
Protective sweep
the cops are allowed to search areas only where a person can hide (bathroom, closet, under the bed, ect)
consent searches
conducted by law enforcement with an individual’s voluntary permission, serving as an exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement.
Cops ask because they don't have probable cause.
Why police would use a No knock warrant
destruction of evidence, the suspect fleeing,
protecting the police,
protection of the occupants
Michigan v. Summers
Richards v. Wisconsin
search warrants
Search warrant you are allowed to detain someone when excusing a search warrant
Things not listed on the search warrant can still be admissible in court.
6am-9pm they can be excused and within 10 days.
a legal doc signed by a neutral judge based on evidence from police.
resonable suspiscion
only for Terry stops, not arrests
articulable facts- there is no definite definition
Exception to the 4th amendment— for officer safety
Chimel v Cali
he courts agreed with Chimel however they also believed that the police officers were acting in “good faith” and in any other circumstance they had enough probable cause for his arrest
The issue is the police went outside of their scope of where they can search
Lungable area - searching the common area to make sure there is nothing there that could be dangerous get a weapon or destruction of evidence
The evidence was suppressed because the search was outside of the perimeter of the arrest
Automobile exceptions/searches
Mobility of the automobile, less of expectation of your auto, and the vehicle and traffic cars (can't use your car to commit crimes)
Chambers v Maroney
Carroll doctrine
allows officers to search cars without a warrant if they have enough probable cause to believe if there is evidence of a crime or if a crime has taken place
Probable cause
must need for a warrant or an arrest warrant
Plain view
police must legally be there
evidence has to be criminal in nature
Arizona v. Hicks
Good faith exception
allows evidence collected by law enforcement officers pursuant to a defective search warrant if they reasonably relied on its validity
Mass v. Shepard
US v Leon
what is standing
you’re ability to be heard in court
US v Ross
Rakus v. Illnois
Totality test
The Constitution doesn't define "unreasonable." So, to decide if a police officer's actions were reasonable, courts test to evaluate everything that happened.
Illinois v. Gates
Night time endorsement
a search warrant that is outside of its normal time frame (6am-9pm)
Arrest warrants
must have probable cause
why? - to protect tangible and testimonial evidence
protects what goes on in the house
if you are arresting a lot of people
Dunaway v. NY (police did not have probable cause)
Defecto arrest
bringing someone to the station but you don't officially arrest them. Depriving them of their liberty to leave
Inventory searches
when police detain someone and they search them or their belongings to make sure that there is no weapons on them or evidence.
Arraignment process
the time between after getting detained and before heading to trial. you are in court with your attorney and the prosecutor, they then both make arguments to the judge if you should be held in jail or out on bond before your court date
Aerial search
of an individual's property does not inherently constitute a search for which law enforcement must obtain a warrant.
Cali. v Carney
Residential Picketing
. means standing, marching, patrolling, or other similar activities by one or more persons focused on, in front of or about a particular residential dwelling without the consent of the dwelling's occupant(s)
3 part porn. test
Miller v. Cali
to determine obscenity: prurient interest, patently offensive sexual conduct, and lack of literary, artistic, political, or scientific value
not protected by the 1st amendment
Explotation of children
CP is not protected bc children cannot consent to it