==Stocks== and ==bonds== are among the many ways of dealing with differing ==risks==, but people who are not considering buying these ==financial securities== must nevertheless confront the same principles in other ways, when choosing a career for themselves or when considering public policy issues for the country as a whole.
Bonds differ from stocks because bonds are legal commitments to pay fixed amounts of money on a fixed date.
Stocks are simply shares of the business that issues them, and there is ==no guarantee== that the business will make a profit in the first place, much less pay out dividends instead of re-investing their profits in the business itself.
==Bondholders== have a legal right to be paid what they were promised, whether the business is making money or losing money.
People who set up businesses may not only fail to make a ==profit== but may even lose part or all of what they originally invested.
If you buy bonds, your chances are still only ==50–50== of getting all your money back and if this enterprise prospers, you are only entitled to whatever rate of return was specified in the bond at the outset, no matter how many millions of dollars the ==entrepreneur== makes with your money.
If the business goes ==bankrupt==, your stock could be ==worthless==, while a bond would have some residual value, based on whatever assets might remain to be sold, even if that only pays the bondholders and other creditors pennies on the dollar.
This is the kind of investment often called “==venture capital==,” as distinguished from buying the stocks or bonds of some ==long-established corporation== that is unlikely to either go bankrupt or to have a spectacular rate of return on its investments.
Knowing that bonds would be ==unattractive== to investors and that a bank would likewise be reluctant to lend to him because of the high risks, the entrepreneur would almost certainly try to raise money by selling stocks instead.
A more common pattern among those businesses that succeed is one of low income or no income at the beginning, followed by higher earnings after the enterprise develops a clientele and establishes a ==reputation==.
The stock market as a whole is not as risky as commodity speculation or venture capital but neither is it a model of stability.
The various degrees and varieties of risk can be dealt with by having a variety of investments—a “==portfolio==,” as they say—so that when one kind of investment is not doing well, other kinds may be flourishing, thereby reducing the over-all risk to your total ==assets==.
A portfolio consisting mostly—or even solely—of stocks can have its risks reduced by having a mixture of stocks from different companies that may be a group of stocks selected by a professional investor who charges others for selecting and managing their money in what is called a “==mutual fund==.”
People who accept jobs with no pay, or with pay much less than they could have gotten elsewhere, are in effect investing their working time, rather than money, in hopes of a larger ==future return== than they would get by accepting a job that pays a higher ==salary== initially.
After first dealing with the ==principles== on which insurance has operated for centuries, we can then see the difference between insurance and various other programs which have arisen in more recent times and have been called “insurance” in political rhetoric.
Like ==commodity speculators,== insurance companies deal with inherent and inescapable risks and insurance both ==transfers== and ==reduces== those risks.
The most common kind of insurance—==life insurance==—compensates for a misfortune that cannot be prevented.
What makes life insurance different from a bond is that neither the individual insured nor the insurance company knows when that particular individual will die.
The ==insurance policy== is worth more to the buyer than it costs the seller because the seller’s risk is less than the risk that the buyer would face without insurance.
There is no point transferring a risk that is not reduced in the process, because the insurer must charge as much as the risk would cost the insured—plus enough more to pay the ==administrative costs== of doing business and still leave a profit to the insurer.
The insurance companies will have more money available than if they had let the money they receive from ==policy-holders== gather dust in a vault, because the insurance companies can then invest what is left over after paying claims and other costs of doing business.
While it might seem that an insurance company could just keep the profit from its investments for itself, in ==reality== ==competition== forces the price of insurance down, as it forces other prices down, to a level that will cover costs and provide a rate of return sufficient to compensate investors, without attracting additional ==competing investment.==
Although determining ==costs== and ==probabilities== for various kinds of insurance involve complex ==statistical calculations== of risk, this can never be reduced to a pure science because of such ==unpredictable== things as changes in behavior caused by the insurance itself as well as differences among people who choose or do not choose to be insured against a given risk.
==Government regulation== can either increase or decrease the risks faced by insurance companies and their customers.
Government regulation can also adversely affect insurance companies and their customers when ==insurance principles== conflict with ==political principles.==
==Laws== forbidding risks to be reflected in insurance premiums and coverage mean that premiums in general must rise, not only to cover ==higher uncertainties== when knowledge of certain risks is banned, but also to cover the cost of increased litigation from policy-holders who claim ==discrimination==, whether or not such claims turn out to be true.