1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Determinism Two Types
Hard Line Determinism
Holback, Calvin
Determinism + Incompatibilism
Soft Line Determinism
Hume, Stace
Determinism + Compatibilism
HLD Arguments
Classical Hard Line Incompatibilist Argument
McKenna and Coates
Free will = you could have done otherwise, we cannot have done otherwise so there is no free will
Deductive Nomological Model of Scientific Explanation
deducing an event from laws and initial conditions
Why did the apple hit Newton’s head? Why did Newton sit under the tree?
Counter - perhaps the laws of psychology are not deterministic but statistical
Explanation by Computer Programs
Input —> CPU —> Output
Counter - there are nondeterministic machines
HLD Critcisms
Moral Responsibility
determinism is inconsistent with moral responsibility
Counter - We can continue with punishment anyways, utilitarian theory of punishment
Counterexamples
people under the same laws and conditions would behave the same way —> Twin Studies
Counter - Even identical twins do not have the exact same conditions
SLD Arguments
Best of Both Worlds
it preserves both the science of human behavior and the commonsense notion of freewill
Counter - reconciliation projects are only good if they work
The Classification Argument
Stace’s Table (Free = Ghandi fasting, Not Free = starving in desert)
Counter - What if Ghandi wanted to free India but his desires were put into him by a brain washer? Wanting something might not just mean you choose it freely
SLD Criticisms
Counterexamples
Acting freely but not doing what you want (homework, donating, etc.)
Counter - conflicting desires (short term, long term)
Not acting freely but doing what you want (cult, “God puppet”, etc)
Counter - the desires must be caused in the right way
Buridan’s Ass
The choice between A and B is equally probable and desirable —> this would lead to inaction
Counter - There are still causes to force A versus B, in reality we would make a choice
Liberitarianism
Campbell, Kane
Indeterminism + Incompatibilism
Counterfactual Freedom
Versions - No Causal, Agency Causal, Event Causal
L Arguments
Return of Moral Responsibility
best theory allowing for moral responsibility
Counter - Acts are caused by nothing rather than responsible action
Introspection
proof we act in a nondetermined way
Counter - not deep enough and not reliable
L Critcisms
Frankfurt Cases
Rejecting the Principle of Alternate Possibilities
The Theoretical Situation of Jones - no alternatives
Challenges from Science
Libet - brain activity prior to a decision
Counter - attention not initiation, slow motor control
Bargh - behavior is modified by stereotypes
Mathews and Canon - behavior is modified by extraneous factors like noise
Deeper Selves and Responsibility Versions
Frankfurt
second-order
Gary Watson
underlying values
Susan Wolf
“sane”
Hypothetical Case of JoJo
values must be “sane” and normal
upbringing influences both second-order desires and values