pt 3: the lobbying puzzle and Hall & Deardorff - Legislative Subsidy

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/8

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

9 Terms

1
New cards

“why so little money in politics?”

  • Federal budget: $6+ trillion

  • Combined lobbying + contributions: <0.1% of stakes

  • Americans spend comparable amounts on candy!

  • Puzzle: If money buys policy, why isn’t there much more of it?

2
New cards

More Puzzling Patterns

  • Lobbyists overwhelmingly target legislators who already agree—not opponents

  • Public interest groups without PACs get extensive access

  • 3 of 4 studies find no significant effect of contributions on roll call votes

  • Party and ideology predict votes far better than contributions

3
New cards

Key insight - hall & deardorff

Lobbying is primarily a legislative subsidy—help provided to legislators who already support the group’s goals.

4
New cards

three types of subsidies

policy information, political intelligence, and legislative labor

5
New cards

policy information

  • research, analysis

  • technical expertise

6
New cards

political intelligence

  • vote counts, strategy

  • coalition information

7
New cards

legislative labor

  • bill drafting

  • testimony, talking points

8
New cards

why target allies?

Helping allies be more effective champions is more valuable than trying to change opponents’ minds.

  • Budget-centered (affects time allocation), not preference-centered (changing minds).

9
New cards

the normative paradox

“Representation is compromised without individual representatives being compromised.” Some constituencies get more subsidies than others.