Wright - Deterrence in Criminal Justice
- state and fed incarceration rates increase
- recently sentencing policy goals: enhancing deterrent effect of crim justice system
* research shows the certainty of punishment is more likely to produce deterrent benefits - conceptualizing deterrence
* increases certainty of punishment, offenders may be deterred by risk of apprehension
* severity of punishment may influence behavior
* problems:
* assumes that ppl consider the consequences before they act
* ½ state prisoners under influence of drugs / alcohol
* most crimes don’t result in an arrest and conviction
* in order for sanctions to deter, potential offenders need to be aware of sanction risks / consequences - certainty vs severity of punishment
* certainty of punishment more effective deterrent
* more severe sentences fail to enhance public safety
* increases risk that lower-risk offenders will be negatively affected by incarceration
* being incarcerated increases risk of recidivism. also being there longer increases
* reduced sentences may reduce recidivism rates - economic costs of more severe sentences
* reducing number of incarcerated non-violent offenders by half could save taxpayers $16.9 billion annually w/o putting public safety at risk
* ex: non-violent drug offenders would benefit more from drug treatment in community based programs
\