Wright - Deterrence in Criminal Justice
- state and fed incarceration rates increase
- recently sentencing policy goals: enhancing deterrent effect of crim justice system * research shows the certainty of punishment is more likely to produce deterrent benefits
- conceptualizing deterrence * increases certainty of punishment, offenders may be deterred by risk of apprehension * severity of punishment may influence behavior * problems: * assumes that ppl consider the consequences before they act * ½ state prisoners under influence of drugs / alcohol * most crimes don’t result in an arrest and conviction * in order for sanctions to deter, potential offenders need to be aware of sanction risks / consequences
- certainty vs severity of punishment * certainty of punishment more effective deterrent * more severe sentences fail to enhance public safety * increases risk that lower-risk offenders will be negatively affected by incarceration * being incarcerated increases risk of recidivism. also being there longer increases * reduced sentences may reduce recidivism rates
- economic costs of more severe sentences * reducing number of incarcerated non-violent offenders by half could save taxpayers $16.9 billion annually w/o putting public safety at risk * ex: non-violent drug offenders would benefit more from drug treatment in community based programs
\