1/159
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Benor (2010)
Ethnolingusitic Repertoire - a set of linguistic resources available to be used by a speaker to signal their ethnic identity
Viv Edwards
Jamaican creole singled out as an educational disadvantage in schools, teachers had negative attitudes towards non-standard varieties - e.g. absence of ‘th’ sound and compounding like ‘foot bottom’ for ‘feet’
Negative attitudes of teachers towards any non-standard variety noting that; The teacher who does not or is not prepared to recognise the problems of the Creole-speaking child in a British English situation can only conclude that he is stupid when he gives either an inappropriate response or no response at all.
The stereotyping process leads features of Creole to be stigmatised and to develop connotations of, amongst other things, low academic ability.
Sapir Whorf hypothesis
Language affects the way we think and perceive the world around us - lingustic determinism
Devyani Sharma (2011)
evidence that ethnolinguistic repertoires exist - speech can be adapted phonologically for different interactions - British Asian Anwar used fewer “Indian sounds” when conversing with cockney mechanic e.g. Retroflex consonants
Ben Rampton & Devyani Sharma (2015)
an individual used more ‘Indian’ pronunciations when expressing political outrage or cultural insult - link between Indian sounds and topic - e.e. Retroflex consonants in words like ‘tap’ or ‘dog’
Howard Giles Matched Guise technique (1975)
Recording delivered in different accents with listeners rating using dif criteria’s - RP rated as most prestigious (acrolect), regional and ethnic accents rated as more pleasant
Criticism: Anderson and Trudgill
Paul Kerswill & Jenny Cheshire (2004-10)
high level of immigration from Jamaica and Nigeria etc. to London in 1950s, influencing slang used by young people today (MLE) - spoken by white birthed people as well as those from ethnic backgrounds - ‘home grown’ speech style
Kerswill
Sociolinguistic Maturation - the point where our Idiolect settles down and stops evolving so rapidly - young peoples language is more dynamic and creative due to a desire to be different, but as we age and change less, our language use becomes more secure like our identity
Support: Stenstrom
Challenge: could be class (Trudgill)
Milroy (2002)
an increase in geographical mobility and reduction of close-knit communities leads to a disruption of linguistic norms - e.g. Belfast study
Kerswill (2001)
Migration from rural areas to urban cities caused dialect levelling - urbanisation leads to minimisation of regional dialects
Support: Dominic Watts Newcastle
Challenge: Milroy migration increased non-fluency features
David Crystal and Global English (2003)
“a world of linguistic diversity can continue to exist in a world united by a common language” - the reason for the spread of English wasn’t just colonisation, instead it was because of power and economics
David Crystal and Threats to having English as a global language
Could create imbalance of power
Could create complacency and decrease in multilingual abilities
Could lead to demise/death of minority languages
Trudgill (1998)
one of the greatest cultural tragedies ever to befall humans is linguistic death
Robert McCrum
Argued the spread of global English is both inevitable and useful
Graddol (1997)
He takes the view that English’s spread across the world may lose momentum
McArthur (1998)
He says english is changing so radically around the world that it may fragment into a ‘family of languages’ as international populations diversify and add their own adaptations to the language
Support: Saraceni, Kachru, Schneider
Kachru’s three circle model of global English (1992)
Inner circle sets the ‘standard’, outer circle creates own variation, expanding circle follows the ‘standard’ - implied a hierarchy of varieties
Saraceni’s model of global English
Suggests that there are Englishes rather than English - English doesn’t belong to England
Schneider’s dynamic model (2007)
English was brought in by settlers:
Exonormative Stabilisation - settler speakers look to the colonial centre for language instruction, language formally established through education and legislation - indigenous acquire second lang and code-switching occurs
Nativisation - settler ties with their ‘land of origin’ weaken and colonised lang strives towards independence - heavy lexical borrowing, changes in phonology, morphology and syntax
Endonormative Stabilisation - moves to a local variety and indigenous people acquire a second language where post-independence varieties developed new standards and norms - stage of self reliance and codification of new norms
Schlegoff
phone calls replicate in-person language uses where telephone conversations follow the Summon and Answer, identification and greeting sequence
Criticism: but not every irl convo follows this sequence, some may start with “its so nice to see you” or more formally start with an introduction so maybe tech is limiting us to a certain format
Werry
people try and imitate their real life speech for example, using more letters than necessary in the texts to imitate semantic nuance
David Crystal and technology
We aren’t destroying the language, we are just using it differently with new linguistic practices e.g. abbreviations
Non-standard is not incorrect - change is not decay, it is simply change and adaptation “no more than a few ripples on the surface of the sea of lang”
Digital communication reflects how people adapt for efficiency, creativity and social interaction - e.g. OMG so excited 2 cu ltr is much quicker
John Humphrys
texting is ‘ruining’ our language, seeing technology as a barrier rather than an aid - hyphen being removed from over 16,000 words in the dictionary due to lazy use of technology - suggests that abbreviation, slang and casual tone of digital communication undermine traditional grammar and vocab - also highlights the real, present day change which is taking place
Lynne Truss
advocates for correct grammar and punctuation in modern day use - standard conventions are essential for clarity and meaning and their erosion diminishes effective communications
Coventry Uni researchers
Children using ‘textisms’ are more familiar with phonemes, demonstrating how it helps our creativity and language manipulation skill - e.g. LOL or Plz
Sherry Turkle
Online communication can lead to less meaningful conversation - people may sacrifice face-to-face interactions - perhaps not impacting our grammar and lexis but rather our psychology and relationships - e.g. can sustain a convo with just back channeling
David Crystal and language change
“All living languages change. They have to. Languages have no existence apart from the people who use them. And because people are changing all the time, their language changes too. The only languages that don’t change are dead ones”
Jean Aitchison’s metaphors
Damp spoon, crumbling castle, infectious disease models
Labov
Martha’s Vineyard study - people alter their local variety to diverge from tourists and form their own identity
Saks study - 3 department stores, middle class store using hyper correction of /r/ sounds to show higher status - links change with class
Milroy and language change
Social Network Theory - change is spread through social networks, with individuals use of language being influenced by their social ties - people with dense networks tend to use language in ways that reinforce existing norms, people with looser social networks are more likely to adopt innovative linguistic forms
Bernstein (1971)
working class speakers are in deficit and have Restricted lexis (inherently deictic, relaxed synaptic, simple coordinating conjunctions) whilst higher social classes are associated with Elaborated codes (standard syntax, subordinate clauses, subordinating conjunctions)
Halliday’s functional theory
language changes because society does (lexical expansion) as a result of changing social function - language is inherently adaptive to accommodate the changing needs e.g. conversion of google from noun to verb or introduction of technology lexicon like laptop, download, zoom
change from above
Government, organisations, church pushed down and said what should happen - e.g. Toubon Law (1994) mandatory for all commercial advertisements and public announcements to be made in french, otherwise fines and penalties
change from below
everyday people create stylistic variations and Sociolects which filter upwards - e.g. the merger of the pronunciation in New Zealand English of the vowels in beer and bear
Bailey’s wave model
A drop of water hitting the surface of a lake - a new aspect of language is initiated (drop), change then spreads out from epicentre like a wave (ripple) - affects locally first, then moves outwards so the closer you are to the epicentre the stronger the ripple - e.g. ‘reem’ used more frequently in Estuary English, this wouldn’t be seen further away in Edinburgh (but, maybe with tech…e.g. MBE)
Chen’s S-Curve model
change occurs at a slow pace creating the initial curve, then increases at speed as it becomes more common and accepted, this can then slow down again and level out once it has fully integrated and is widely used
Substratum theory
change in language comes about through language contact with other languages - e.g. borrowings like Doppelgänger or Americanisms like ‘candy’ or ‘movie’
Penelope Eckhert ways of discussing age (1998)
chronological - number of years since birth
Biological - physical maturity
Social - social maturity
Younger speakers drive linguistic innovation, older speakers prefer to use more traditional forms
Julia Coleman
compares to life cycle of frog in the right habitat - needs to be a standard official form of lang, sense of group identity at bottom of a hierarchy, threat to individuality or self expression, awareness that conditions could be better, frictions that can only be expressed verbally, some toleration of slang from those in authority, adaptability
Giles Accommodation theory and age
Young converge towards language used in time spent with peers, but diverge from adults to maintain identity
Anna-Brita Stenstrom
teen talk = irregular turn taking, overlaps, taboo topics and slang, word shortening - e.g. isn’t → innit, lit and LOL colloquialisms, expletives
Ives
Interviewed teenagers in West Yorkshire - teenager-specific language includes: frequent slang, colloquial word choices, taboo subjects
AC Grimson (1962)
argued that there are time where RP could be a disadvantage, especially in social situations where empathy and affection are required
George Osbourne RP case study
dropped his RP accent when addressing workers and was seen to pick it back up in parliament - e.g. using ‘kinda’ instead of ‘kind of’
John Swales (2011)
Created idea of discourse communities who share common goals and specialist lexis - poses a required level of skill and knowledge for function
Almut Koester (2004)
Phatic talk is important as banter and interaction is key to a productive work environment and creates positivity - workers need to establish interpersonal relationships and have interactions which are not work related
Michael Nelson
found existence of business lexis when investigated corpora of business English vs general - includes an avoidance of personal topics and a lack of negative lexis (neutral and informative language) - coincides with semantic field of business eg people, money, companies
Hornyak (1994)
Shift from work to personal talk initiated by highest ranking person - discourse largely chosen by individual with most power - challenges swales as Hornyak assumes discourse is chosen not pre-existing
Fairclough (1992)
modern trend towards ‘conversationalism’ at work, exchanges becoming less formal
Drew and Heritage (1992)
created theory of Institutional talk - members of a discourse community have the same goal outcome - those in power interrupt more - no personal discussion allowed - specific professional jargon - also suggested there are strong hierarchies of power within organisations, with asymmetrical relationships marked by language use
Waering (1990)
identified personal power as often stemming from occupation - convos have “inescapable power asymmetry” stemming from knowledge imbalance
Mischler (1984)
convos between doctors and patients formed struggled between ‘voice of medicine’ and ‘voice of the life world’
Karoline Stefanias (2010)
voice of medicine is objective, neutral, depersonalised - voice of life world is subjective, emotional, set in patients biography - supports existence of dif voices and miscommunication between them too
Catrina Cox and Zoe fritz (2022)
lang used by medical professionals can belittle patients making them feel “blamed and helpless” - doctors searching for the ‘presenting complaint’ - clinical medicine lang renders patient as object of doctors actions, conferring passivity e.g. ‘sending’ patient home
Herregard (2000)
Workplace is time constrained so initialisms, acronyms and other jargon make workplace more efficient e.g. VNP at the Ivy
Holmes (1998)
female managers more likely to negotiate and reach consensus before applying mandate, male managers less likely to ensure general agreement - more of a gender issue, not role or power issue
Adam Fox
without language, there would be no competence of profession - jobs wouldn’t work without the language - tech and scientific lexis is necessary
Labov (1962)
Certain work environments cultivate certain repertoire - department store study, asked for ‘fourth floor’ in 3 different stores, more prestigious forms used in more prestigious shops - looking at pronunciation of phonological variable /r/ in the middle and ends of words - Saks had highest value of /r/ - but is this not bc of class, not work?
Fishman
52 hours of convos between American couples - women use tag questions e.g. “you know?”, following a thought or suggestion to gain conversational power - argues questioning is required for females when speaking with males, an effective way of maintaining conversations with males
Zimmerman and West (1975)
10 pairs of men/women, 11 men and women pairs - men spoke more and interrupted more (96-100%) but rarely interrupted other men - women only interrupted other women - but this is an unrepresentative sample - interruption as a tool of conversational dominance
Beattie (1982)
Challenges Z and West and considered over 10 times the corpus- men and women interrupted with more or less equal frequency - confirms idea that society has chosen to believe in male dominance?
Lakoff (1975) ‘language and woman’s place’ conclusions
lang had the effect of putting and keeping women in their place e.g. foregrounding women with their physical attributes - but also women kept in place by the way they use lang themselves, socialised to use trivial and powerless sounding lang e.g. super polite forms - not stylistic choices, but socially conditioned behaviours
Lakoff ‘lang and woman’s place’ findings
women use more backchanneling, hedging, intensifiers, hyper polite forms and apologies, indirect commands, less slang and taboo (women setting the standard with less slang?)
But carried out in 1975 and largely based on anecdotal evidence
Deborah Cameron (2012)
difference is a myth - ‘verbal hygiene’, people clean the way they speak bc of how they think they should based on gender - it is a conscious effort
Dale Spender (1980)
The structure of lang is patriarchal ‘man-made language’ - men dominate in convo bc men dominate in society, conditioning makes women polite and respectful towards men, marginalising female voices - lang defaults to the idea of men
Jennifer Coates
girls and boys develop dif speaking styles due to dif interactions in their larger hierarchy boy/ smaller girl friendship groups - all female talk is cooperative, unlike male or mixed gender talk - girls being encouraged to be typical ‘girls’ and boys encouraged to be typical ‘boys’ - cooperative vs competitive discourses
Jane Pilkington
women aim for positive politeness, men in all-male talk are less collaborative (verbal sparring), women talk to affirm solidarity and maintain relationships
Kuiper
men use insults to express solidarity, men spend less attention on saving ‘face’ - so perhaps men can also be considerate and empathetic, but just differently to women
Trudgill Norwich study
Studied the speech of ppl in Norwich to find out how gender and social class affected pronunciation - ppl from lower classes were more likely to use non-standard pronunciation, and men were more likely to use non-standard forms than women - gender or class issue?
O’Barr and Atkins
lang differs on situation specific power NOT gender - studied courtroom observing witnesses and examining them for basic speech difs between men and women - ‘women’s language’ consisted of hedges, empty adjective, apologising more etc - they discovered that Lakoff’s proposed differences were not necessarily the result of being a women, but of being powerless.
Miller and Swift (gender)
provided practical ways of improving gender equality - use of pronoun ‘them’ instead of ‘he’ or ‘she’ to replace gender bias or replacing marked terms with neutrals - ‘handbook of non-sexist writing’
Tannen (1990)
men try to fix problems while women try and find sympathy, men are direct in demands while women make suggestions instead, men speak briefly around facts while women talk lots about feelings
Miller and Swift (PC)
handbook of non-sexist writing - using gender neutral terms to replace bias and marked terms e.g. “they” or “people” instead of mankind
Deborah Cameron (PC)
verbal hygiene - ‘in the mouths of sexists, language can always be sexist’
Pinker
Euphemism treadmill - against linguistic reflectionism - replacement words will develop negative connotations, PC terms will pejorative and need replacement - e.g. third world → developing world → less economically developed world
Fairclough (PC)
PC isn’t enough, we need to change society and the way it thinks about minority groups - linguistic reflectionism idea
Dwight Bolinger (1980)
language the loaded weapon - ‘the writer or speaker has to choose between perpetuating sexist language and making a mess of the grammar’
Amanda Cole university of Essex
Found that cockney and RP are vanishing among young Briton and being replaced by MLE, Estuary English and standard southern British English
Dominic Watt dialect levelling in Newcastle (2002)
Supra local = larger local area - Hyper local = very specific local area. Younger speakers were using more supra-local vowel forms. Watt believed that wanted to disassociate themselves from stereotypes around northerners but they also felt a sense of loyalty towards their dialect so did not drop it completely. A balancing act
Kerswill talking about spread of MLE
"Adolescence is the life stage at which people most willingly take on new visible or audible symbols of group identification," - so can the spread of MLE be solely put down to age?
Wilde
'The great majority of English dialects are of little importance, and we can afford to let them go.'
Keith Harvey (2000)
‘Camp Talk’ - surface features such as puns, sexual puns and co-occurrence of explicitness with delicacy
Deborah Cameron (2003)
homosexual speech seen as ‘gender-deviant’ - gay men speak like women, lesbians speak like men - e.g. gender deviance seen in Margaret thatcher as a tool of power like making her voice deeper
Lakoff (1975) and sexuality
gay men’s speech traits are intentionally similar to those of women’s e.g. hedging, superlatives
Cameron and Klick (2003)
’those structures, institutions, relations and actions that promote and produce heterosexuality as natural, self evident, privileged and necessary’ - describing heteronormativity
Gender Binarism
The social construct that assumes only two genders exist (male and female)
Judith Butler (1990)
performativity/constructivism - we all perform our gendered and sexual identities every day, consciously or not
Jespersen (1922)
men use more difficult words, women use simpler words, more false starts and emotional language, and speak with less thought
Deficit model marketing example
male is used as the default in marketing e.g. men’s razors are the standard versions, but women’s razors are the deviation/variation
Dynamic model social Media profile example
modern day example, online identity construction, designing and refining profile to produce an ongoing narrative about ourselves
Little (2012)
’gender is something we do or perform, not something we are’
Hyde
With age, binary view of gender ingrained in us = more expectation to perform ideas of masculinity/femininity
Eckhert and gender
gender is not a discrete variable and interacts with other aspects of identity - gender must be seen as active and viewed under and intersectional lens - other factors e.g. class, the topic being talked about, and who they are talking to
Talbot (2010) f
gender is socially constructed - people admire “masculine” or “feminine” characteristics - “Being born male or female has far-reaching consequences. It affects how we act in the world and how the world treats us”
Anderson and Trudgill (1990)
Argued that attitudes towards accents are based more on social connotations and prejudices surrounding the location or social group, rather than the sound itself - e.g. experiment with outsiders, American speakers know nothing about the Birmingham accent or the area and do not find it unpleasant - but could just be saying this bc they are being studied/dont want to be rude
ITV tonight and ComRes study (2013)
28% of Britons feel they have been discriminated against because of their regional accents and 80% of employers admitted to making discriminatory decisions based on regional accents
Joanna Thornborrow (2004)
‘One of the most fundamental ways we have of establishing our identity, and of shaping other people’s views of who we are, is through our language use’
Gary Ives Bradford study (2014)
8 teenage boys with a Pakistani background, code switching to emphasises group identity and exclude others - conscious choice to switch between punjabi and English to distinguish themselves from ‘freshies’
Chloe Burrows code switching
Altered her repertoire when speaking to mixed race contestants on love island - ‘blaccent’ when speaking to mixed race toby
Fareed Zakaria
American Indian CNN broadcaster - notably used more Indian phonemes when speaking on CNN India, compared to US TV - code switching