prof.: chad tomaselli @ grayson college
problems in new US left over from old country
debt, mercantilism, interior security
the cabinet
created by washington; a group of people who run different things in executive branch
not in constitution
Secretary of Treasury
handled money (taxes, tariffs, etc.)
originally Alexander Hamilton
Secretary of State
handles states, foreign policy, everything else
originally Thomas Jefferson
Secretary of War
oversaw daily military functions (president still over whole military)
Attorney General
handles enforcement of law
policies from First US Congress
tariff of 1789
judiciary act of 1789
tariff of 1789
established national gov.’s right to regulate trade and raise or lower taxes
sig: tariffs used to raise money until great depression
Judiciary Act of 1789
created national tiered court system
Supreme Courts → Circuit (Appeal) Courts → District Courts → State Courts
Chief Justice of Supreme Court
head of supreme court, calls session to order, has more say on appeals
Section 25 of Judiciary Act
establishes almost any act can appeal to SCOTUS
money and civil cases can go but are rarely seen
US is first country to do so
hamilton’s “Public Good and Elitism” philosophy
stated gov should not be selfish but should do things for the people, divided people into two groups:
elites (rich, entrepreneurs, business owners, political figures)
masses (everyone else)
elitist must be on board for social action or change will be very hard
debt in 1789
loans were at 15% of original value
elites bought farmer’s loans while they were waiting for gov to repay them
Funding (in Hamilton’s Funding & Assumption Plan)
government bought every IOU at their original value with government bonds
traded one big loan for the people’s little loans
gov only paid interest off in beginning
Assumption (in Hamilton’s Funding & Assumption Plan)
national government assumed/took on state debt
problems and compromise in Funding & Assumption
Jefferson threatened to remove assumption but agreed if capital city was in south, he’d ignore it
Powers of First Bank of the US
print money/ issue currency
store money
make loans to businesses
control interest rates @ other banks
significance of First Bank of US
started debate over constitution interpretation
created financial stability
strict construction
believed government could only do what is specifically written in constitution and nothing else
so national bank, cabinet, etc. were unconstitutional
loose construction
believed government should follow constitution but with reasonable room for interpretation
pointed to “Necessary and Proper” clause of constitution
significance of strict vs loose construction argument
still argued over today but under different name
dynamic between those in power and choice of interpretation still exists
ideas of Federalist Political Party
hamiltonian economics
high tariffs
more taxes
favored Northern, Urban environment
preferred Britain as foreign partner
ideas of Democratic - Republican Party
jefferson’s economics
low tariffs
less taxes
favored southern, rural environment
preferred France as foreign partnerf
election of 1792
Washington had to be convinced to run again
pres.: Washington
VP: John Adams
Whiskey Rebellion (1794)
Hamilton taxed the production and sale of whiskey, farmers began to rebel, but stopped at when Washington sent volunteer army
3 significances of Whiskey Rebellion
established national government’s ability to deal with internal disturbances
set precedent of how gov. would treat rebellions (send army or nat. guard)
showed new gov. and const. could and would enforce the law
Northwest Indian War (1785-95)
large coalition of Natives banded together to fight further American colonization of West, led to discovery that british troops were violating treaty by still occupying Western US
gave people reason to push for war
Jays Treaty (1794)
washington sent John Jay, who was not secretary of state, to prevent war with Britain:
british agreed to remove troops finally from US soil
brit. gave US favored nation status in regards to trade
3 outcomes of Jay’s Treaty
no promise from British to end impressment
everyone generally disliked treaty because it solved no issues
senate accepted treaty b/c only alternative was war w/ British
3 significances of Jay’s Treaty
did prevent war with british that US would’ve lost
first high criticism of washington as a president
step in formation/definition of political parties
Election of 1796
President: John Adams, Federalist
VP: Thomas Jefferson, Democratic Republican
first election where party affiliation mattered
Federalists controlled all 3 branches
XYZ Affair (1797)
set of latter between Adams and french ministers saying that in order to meet with Talleyrand:
US had to give french $10m dollar loan
US had to give personal gift to Talleyrand of $250k
Quasi War (1798-1800)
undeclared naval war between french and america
Convention of 1800
napolean, now ruling france, agreed with Adams to be friends/allies, promised free trade
origins of Alien and Sedition Acts
federalist party wanted to limit political influence of french immigrants and attack Democratic-Republican Party for anti-government press
Alien Friends Act
gave president power to deport any resident alien deemed dangerous to the safety and peace of US
never used, expired 1800
Alien Enemies Act
immigrants from a nation at war with US could be deported w/out cause
not used by Adams, but still exists today under different name in code of law
Sedition Act
criticizing federal government or president was a crime
aimed at democratic-republican press, was used numerous times
significance of Alien and Sedition Acts
gave president powers not in constitution
issues/acts controversial then and still today
biggest negative on Adam’s legacy/presidency/career
Virginia and Kentucky Resolution (1798)
Thomas Jefferson and James Madison met with Southern and Southwest states secretly to interpret constitution as response to Alien and Sedition Acts
Compact Theory
in creating and ratifying constitution, states gave up power to national government and wrote out specific powers for national gov. → states have power to interpret constitution
Nullification
declares that states can nullify a law through lack of enforcement if they find it unconstitutional
only worked if majority of states agreed
did not officially repeal law but removed law’s power
contract theory
opposing constitutional interpretation theory to compact theory; people wrote and ratified constitution → courts interpret through judicial review
favored by supreme court and national government
significances of Compact Theory and Nullification
despite being invalid, states kept trying (and failing) to use nullification
southern leaders based right to secede on compact theory