Empirical Knowledge
Knowledge gained from experience
A priori knowledge
Knowledge that comes from a theory or reasoning
Epistemological humility
Awareness that our knowledge is incomplete
Angles in a triangle = 180
More certain knowledge, it is impossible to be untrue
Egg yolks are always yellow
Less certain knowledge, it is uncertain to be proven true
The form of beauty
Indestructible, as even if you destroyed all beautiful things, you cannot destroy ‘beauty’. Also independent as all beautiful things share in it but are not limited to it.
Forms
Elements of true knowledge
The Form of anything is not physical but is the eternal idea of what a thing is.
Episteme
Knowledge
Doxa
Opinion
Particulars
Knowledge of particulars is opinion and not true knowledge at all
What Form is the supreme Form?
The Good
Analogy of the Cave
The analogy of the cave shows the journey that the philosopher makes from illusion to reality – from ignorance to the world of Forms.
Analogies in the Cave
The cave
World of senses
Shadows on the wall
Illusions
Chains
Ignorance
Fire
The sun
Objects on the wall
Physical things
The difficult ascent
The dialectic – the process of arriving at truth
The reflections
The process of understanding
The moon and stars
The Forms of justice, beauty etc.
The Sun
The Form of the Good
Plato’s teacher
Socrates
What aspects of Plato's theory does the cave analogy reinforce?
The effort needs to come from the individual to turn away from what they’re shown and come to the light.
Knowledge is remembering
In what way are the intelligible world and the sensible world related?
The sensible world is a shadow of the intelligible world
Plato is a d___
Dualist
he claimed that there are two worlds
AO2- ‘One over many’
is not strictly an argument for the Forms.
All it proves is that there are properties of things. Those properties might be immanent - in this world - or they might simply be names we give to things - this is known as nominalism.
AO2- The third man argument
If we have a collection of large things and their form “largeness” then we should consider the collection of things large, as well as the form “largeness” itself large.
But in that case, do we not have to appeal to a further form to consider largeness large? And why should we stop there?
This criticism undermines the idea that the Forms can be ideal standards. It shows that we would need to appeal to an infinite amount of Forms simply to make one judgement.
The name of this argument comes from the idea that if you need a Form of a man to explain a particular man, why do you not also need a third man, a Form of the Form of the man to explain that?
AO2- Lack of empirical support
There is a lack of empirical support.
It is not really surprising that Plato provides little empirical evidence for his theory as he shows, especially in the analogy of the cave, that he believes empirical data is next to useless in gaining real knowledge.
Plato is a rationalist and, as such, makes use of logic and a priori reasoning for his proofs.
A02- Modern Criticism
From a modern standpoint, it looks suspicious that the theory has so little grounding in empirical data, and indeed, appears completely counter-intuitive.
For instance, if this world is not really real, and the World of Forms is invisible and only knowable through the intellect, how is it that we are able to predict the behaviour of this world so well through scientific theories? And not just predict, but also manipulate and make the natural world work for us through the use of technology?
A02- Disconnect from science
Plato was not able to see the astounding success of science, which would come nearly 1800 years after his death.
However, it is possible that even if he could have foreseen it, he might still have pointed to the prisoners making guesses about the objects that threw their shadows on the wall in his cave analogy and implied that science is still just a really sophisticated version of this game.
Archetype
An initial model or idea from which later ideas and models of the same thing are all derived.