1/72
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Pragmatics
the study of how we use language in context and how context contributes to meaning
linguistic context
what has been said earlier in the conversation
extra linguistic context
context outside of a language/conversation
situational context
the local environment of the utterance
social context
the relationships and norms of the social situation
given information
assumed by the speaker because it is common knowledge. Either extra linguistic context or previously established in the discourse
new information
assumed by the speaker to be unknown or not likely inferred by the listener
grices cooperative principle
people in conversations assume that what people say is intended to contribute to the purposes of the conversation.
maxims of quality
Expectations of honesty. Say what you believe to be true, dont say something that lacks adequate evidence.
maxims of relevance
contribute to the topic, be relevant
maxims of quantity
provide the right amount of information, make contributions as informative as required, not more or less.
maxims of manner
make straight-forward contributions. Be brief, orderly, avoid ambiguity, avoid being obscure
violating maxims
someone doesnt conform to the requirement of a maxim, could be intentional or unintentional
Violating maxim example
Parent: "What would you like for lunch"
Child: "When's screen time?"
(relevance)
flouting maxims
a speaker says something that in its literal form violates a maxim but can be understood through the communication (jokes, humor)
flouting maxims example
"I'm pretty sure my tik tok is going to go viral"
"Right, and I'm going to win the Nobel Prize"
entailment
facts must be true if a given proposition is true. If A, then B (b is entailed by a)
Proposition: Monique owns a red card
Entailment: monique owns a car, monique owns things (not entailed: monique owns a sports car)
Conversational implicature
inferences made based on a language. information inferred from the non-literal meaning of a sentence. implied, sarcasm
"Ann was an okay professor"
Implicature: Ann was neither an excellent nor horrible professor
speech acts
language lets us perform actions. Assertion, question, request, order, promise, threat
direct speech act
Locution: the utterance/sentence. "I apologize for being late"
Illocution: Communicative intention. Apology? Assertion?
Perlocution: Effect on the listener. Appeased? Remorseful?
indirect speech act
Someone is blocking the door.
Locution: the utterance/sentence. Can you open the door"
Illocution: Communicative intention. Asking to open the door, not questioning ability.
Perlocution: Effect on the listener. May open door, feel annoyed, ignore it.
Milestone: 0-1 month
cooing, not true speech sounds
milestone: 6 months
Babbling (more likely to produce stops [p b m t d n k g s h w g])
milestone: 8-11 months
first signs of comprehension (can distinguish between sounds)
milestone: 11-13 months
first word production
milestone: 12-18 months
one word speech, accumulate words. Requests (juice), labels (daddy). Simplification of words, syllable deletion (potato [dedo])
milestone: 18-22 months
vocabulary spurt, 2 word speech. Location, action, theme. Baby chair, doggie bark, ken water
milestone: 2-4 years
complex syntactic structures. Man ride bus
milestone: 5-6 years
more basic syntactic structures. 12k-14k words, fluent production
competence
arent aware of the nuances of language
performance
immature phonological abilities limit input and output abilities
comprehension
cant always identify individual words and sounds
production
cant always articulate inflections. could drop a coda
Positive evidence
babies receive positive evidence from hearing grammatical sentences, not negative.
Brown & hanlon (1970)
transcripts of parent-child interactions. Found that production of approval doesn't differ based on correctness or content of the utterance
over regularization
application of grammatical rules to an irregular item
experience matters
What you grow up with, you learn; exposure. Language learning is experience-dependent.
Innateness
Humans are genetically predisposed to acquire language. Language structure is aided by neural structures.
Lenneberg (1967)
Critical Period Hypothesis - Without linguistic interaction before 5-6, language development is severely limited (link to Genie). Critical period ends around puberty.
Genie case study
13 year old found living in isolation, never learned a language because never exposed, proves nurture plays a role in language development (critical period). Vocabulary grew but syntax never developed
Poverty of the stimulus
When linguistic input is impoverished, children learn linguistic grammars that are more sophisticated and more complex than what they were exposed to.
Nicaraguan sign language
Individuals: The younger they were entering the more fluent they were. 1st cohort was 10 or older. 2nd cohord age 4.
Conclusion: children created the grammatical rules/structure to the language. Younger children take the impoverished input, regularize it, and make it more complex.
synchronic linguistics
the study of a language at a given point in time
diachronic linguistics
study of language development through time
historical linguistics
language change across time and history
language changes based on
creativity, social factors, geographic division
acronym
combining initial letters into a pronounceable word
blend
combining phonemes of 2 or more words. snow + armageddon = snowmageddon
clipping
shortening of a word. (application --> app)
coining
creating new words by combining phonemes (quark)
borrowing
cookie: dutch koek (cake) + -je --> koekje (little cake)
semantic changes
broadening, reduction, elevation, degradation
broadening
The meaning of a word broadens, incorporates a larger number of things. Cupboard - a location for cups and plates --> general purpose cabinet
reduction
meaning of a word narrows, the number decreases. Meat - solid food --> animal flesh
elevation
a word becomes more positive. Pretty: cunning --> clever --> attractive
degradation
word becomes more negative. accident: chance event --> unfortunate occurence
factors in word choice
lexical support, vocabulary convergence
lexical support
non verbal aids to build vocabulary
vocabulary convergence
natural tendency to express a concept with a single word
paradigm leveling
Taking grammatically conditioned set of forms and making the forms more similar or identical. Complete or partial elimination of variation within a paradigm.
I am = I is
we are = we is
"I weren't there" instead of "I wasn't there"
cēozan
choo[z]e
scalar implicature
A type of conversational implicature that occurs when a speaker chooses a relatively vague expression rather than a stronger, more specific one.
presupposition
something assumed in advance
Deictic expressions
Word or expression that takes its meaning relative to the time, place, and speaker of the utterance. ("tomorrow", when is tomorrow?)
morphological regularization
A pressure/preference for uniformity causes ways of speaking to become erased in favor of a dominant pattern.
phonological merger
a sound change where two or more distinct sounds (phonemes) that were once separate become indistinguishable and merge into a single sound (cot-caught, mary-merry)
deictic expression example
that, me, it
non-deictic expression example
so, cool, let, see
genie and chelsea takeaway
their vocabulary grew steadily but their syntactic abilities remained poor
home signs
the signs that deaf children who do not have access to a sign language create to communicate with their hearing family members
aglospeak
alternative spellings or code words used online to avoid algorithmic censorship — represents a form of language change driven primarily by technological and social constraints rather than by natural shifts in pronunciation or grammar.