The branch of the federal government that interprets the laws of the nation.
2
New cards
Supreme Court
The highest level of the federal judiciary, which was established in article III of the constitution and serves as the highest court in the nation.
3
New cards
original jurisdiction
The authority of a court to act as the first court to hear a case, which includes the finding of facts in the case.
4
New cards
appellate jurisdiction
The authority of a court to hear and review decisions made by lower courts in that system.
5
New cards
Federalist no. 78
Argument by Alexander Hamilton that the federal judiciary would be unlikely to infringe upon rights and liberties but would serve as a check on the other two branches.
6
New cards
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
A Supreme Court decision that established judicial review over federal laws.
7
New cards
judicial review
The authority of the Supreme Court to strike down a law or executive action if it conflicts with the Constitution.
8
New cards
criminal law
A category of law covering actions determined to harm the community.
9
New cards
civil law
A category of law covering cases involving private rights and relationships between individuals and groups.
10
New cards
federal district courts
The lowest level of the federal judiciary; these courts usually have original jurisdiction in cases that start at the federal level.
11
New cards
federal courts of appeals
The middle level of the federal judiciary; these courts review and hear appeals from the federal district courts.
12
New cards
precedent
A judicial decision that guides future courts in handling similar cases.
13
New cards
stare decisis
The practice of letting a previous legal decision stand.
14
New cards
majority opinion
Binding Supreme Court opinions, which serve as precedent for future cases.
15
New cards
concurring opinion
An opinion that agrees with the majority decision, offering different or additional reasoning, that does not serve as precedent.
16
New cards
dissenting opinion
An opinion that disagrees with the majority opinion and does not serve as precedent.
17
New cards
judicial restraint
A philosophy of constitutional interpretation that justices should be cautious in overturning laws.
18
New cards
judicial activism
A philosophy of constitutional interpretation that justices should wield the power of judicial review, sometimes creating bold new policies.