1/111
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
When does common law rule over a contract?
When it is for the sale of land or services
When does the UCC rule over a contract?
When it is for the sale of goods
What is a contract?
an agreement between parties that can be enforced in court
What do you need to form a contract?
Mutual assent and consideration
What makes up mutual assent?
offer and acceptance
What is consideration?
Bargained-for exchange of something of legal value (both sides need consideration)
When are promises enforceable?
Only if they are part of a bargain in which something of legal value is exchanged for that promise (a legal detriment)
What is a legal detriment?
The party does or agrees to do something he was not obligated to do, or refrains from doing something he has the right to do
Does consideration need monetary value?
No
What are Unilateral Contracts?
A promise in exchange for action, or where only one side is promising something. Consideration is satisfied through the action or forbearance
Example: I’ll give you $1,000 if you promise to not name your child after me
What does not constitute consideration?
pre-existing duties and past consideration
What are pre existing duties?
something you are legally obligated to do. If no additional consideration is given by a party in exchange for the promise, then its not enforceable (think of the contractor who says he pay me an extra $20,000, the owner originally agrees but then doesn’t pay. Not enforceable because the owner isn’t getting anything in exchange for the promise)
What are past considerations?
Something that is done before the bargain is made can’t be used as consideration (if I give someone my car, it is not consideration for them to go since you gave me your car last week, I’ll paint your house)
What is promissory estoppel?
If a promise is made without consideration, but someone relies on that promise to their detriment, the detrimental reliance is a substitute for consideration (I promise to give the hospital $1,000,000 for new equipment, they rely on that and buy new equipment, I am on the hook for the $1,000,000 since they relied)
What is an offer?
Communication of willingness to enter into a contract that creates the power of acceptance in the party to whom the offer is being made
What does an offer require?
intent to enter into a bargain
definite terms
What is intent to enter into a bargain?
A reasonable person would believe that his assent would create an agreement, not just an invitation to deal or negotiate (I would consider vs I will see)
What counts as definite terms?
Terms that are specific enough that a court could enforce a contract based on them
What are definite terms that are required?
Identity of offeree, subject matter, and price
What if a definite term is missing?
If there is a standard for the court to apply to the missing term, then the contract is still enforceable. If not, then it is not enforceable
Identity of offeree
must be limited toward a certain person or class of people. If it is open to the general public with no limitation, then it isn’t definite enough. There must be a limit to the amount of people who can accept
What if there is no limit on the identity of the offeree?
If there is no limit or it’s open to the general public, then it will be classified as an invitation
What does a land sale contract need to identify?
the land and price term
what does a sale of good contract need to identify?
type and quantity of goods
What does an employment offer need to identify?
type of work to be done
How can an offer be terminated?
passage of time, death of either party, revocation by offeror, or rejection by offeree
Passage of time
If an offer doesn’t specify a length of time it’ll remain open, then it is a reasonable time considering the circumstances
Revocation by offeror
termination of an offer done through the offeror saying “i revoke my offer”. If the offeror offers to keep the offer open for a certain period of time, there must be consideration on both sides for it to be truly irrevocable for that time period
Option contracts
A type of contract where there is a separate agreement binding the offeror to keep the offer open for a period of time. There must be consideration given for keeping the contract open
Merchant’s firm offer
Exception to option contracts, where if it is merchant selling goods and he agrees in a signed writing to hold the offer open for a length of time, it is irrevocable even without consideration
Revocation through indirect communication
If the offeree has reliable information that the offeror has revoked the offer, then it is revoked (i offer to sell you my car, then you see someone else driving that car and they say that i sold you it)
rejection by offeree
done either by the offeree saying i reject (or something that gives that belief in the offeror) or by a counteroffer
Acceptance
a manifestation of assent to the terms of the offer (communication indicating a desire to be bound by contract). Must be aware of the offer in order to accept it
Methods of Acceptance
Acceptance must be done how it is specified in the agreement, and are usually accepted in the same way the offer was made. Silence does not constitute acceptance even if it is said in the offer
UCC acceptance for sale of goods
Can be done either through promise to ship or through prompt shipment
Nonconforming Goods
Under UCC, if the prompt shipment happens but it is nonconforming goods, then it is acceptance and they would be in breach
Exception to nonconforming goods as acceptance
If seller sends the wrong goods along with a note saying “we’re out of the specific good here is a substitute as an accommodation”, then it is a counteroffer that can be rejected, not acceptance and a breach
What if the seller accepts the offer, then sends nonconforming goods with a notice?
Does NOT fit into the exception for nonconforming goods because the seller first accepted through promise to perform
Mirror Image Rule
Under common law, acceptance must be for the exact same terms as in the offer. If there are new terms given during acceptance, then it is a rejection and counteroffer
Does UCC follow the mirror image rule?
Nope. UCC allows for acceptance that contains additional terms, unless it is made conditional expressly in the acceptance (ill buy your car IF you wash and vacuum it)
If new terms are added to a UCC offer, does the seller have to perform?
Yes if both parties are merchants. Otherwise no
Mailbox rule
Acceptance is effective the moment it is DEPOSITED in the mailbox. Rejections or terminations are effective when RECEIVED. (If i put a rejection in the mail, and before it is received I put an acceptance in the mail, then I have accepted and it is an enforceable contract
Integration of a contract
A contract that the parties both intend to be the final and complete version
Parol Evidence Rule
If there is a written contract that is integrated, written or oral statements made prior to the writing or oral statements made while writing aren’t admitted to the contract
Exceptions to parol evidence rule
evidence that affects validity of the agreement, evidence of when the contract becomes effective (basically evidence that shows that the agreement never came into being)
Rules of construction
contracts are construed as a whole
words are construed as their ordinary meaning
courts interpret contracts to make them enforceable and valid
ambiguities are interpreted against the party who made them
Article 2 interpretation provisions
has codes for missing terms, delivery and risk of loss, warranties, implied warranties of merchantability, implied warranty of fitness, and breach
missing terms under UCC
Other than the quantity term (required), the UCC will supply missing terms
What if the price is missing under UCC?
The UCC says the price is a reasonable price at the time of delivery
What if the place for delivery is missing under UCC?
UCC says that it is the seller’s place of business, or his home if he doesn’t have a place of business
What if time of shipment is missing under UCC?
Shipment is due in a reasonable time
risk of loss during delivery
risk of loss depends on the delivery terms and if the seller is a merchant. If the seller is a merchant and the method of delivery is not by a carrier, risk of loss passes to the buyer when the buyer takes possession. If the seller is not a merchant, risk of loss passes to the buyer when the goods are ready for pickup. If delivery is by a common carrier, then the buyer has risk of loss at the time the carrier receives the goods (but they can usually recover from the carrier)
warranties
Sale of goods contracts automatically contain certain warranties, and a warranty is a guarantee made by the seller making a statement of fact that the buyer relies on when entering into the contract
Warranty of title
automatic warranty in UCC contracts that the seller is conveying good title and that the transfer is rightful
Implied warranty of merchantability
automatic implied warranty in UCC contracts that the good are fit for the ordinary purpose for which they are used
implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
automatic implied warranty where the seller says the goods are fit for a particular purpose if:
1. the seller has reason to know of the particular purpose for which the goods are going to be used and the buyer relies on that judgement in selecting the goods and 2. the buyer relies on the seller skills
Breach of warranty
breach of warranty is a breach of contract and damages are calculated by finding the difference in the value of the goods accepted and the value of goods promised
Reasons a contract might not be enforced
Doesn’t follow statute of frauds and it needs to, mistake, misrepresentation, lack of capacity, Unconscionability
Statute of Frauds
contracts that have to be evidenced by writing. Evidence can’t be admitted to add a missing term (it would be unenforceable)
What contracts fall under the SOF
promises creating an interest in land, promises where the terms can’t be performed within one year, contracts for the sale of goods over $500
types of mistakes
mutual mistake, unilateral mistake, misunderstanding
Mutual mistake
If both parties are mistaken, the contract would be voidable if it concerns a basic assumption of the contract, has a material effect, and if the party seeking to avoid the contract did not assume the risk of mistake
Unilateral mistake
If one party makes a mistake and the non-mistaken party knew or had reason to know of the mistake, then the mistaken party can avoid the contract
Misunderstanding (defenses)
If there is a contract with two possible meanings and neither party is aware, it will only be enforceable if both parties intend the same meaning. If both parties are aware of the ambiguity, the contract will only be enforceable if both parties intend the same meaning. If one party knows of the ambiguity, the contract is enforceable according to the meaning of the party who was unaware
Misrepresentation (defenses)
If misrepresentation was accidental, innocent party may void contract if the misrepresentation was material
If misrepresentation was intentional, only a justifiable reliance is necessary to void the contract
Lack of capacity (defenses)
If it is a minor, they lack the capacity but it would be binding on the adult (the adult can’t use it as a defense against performing the contract). Also duress or overpowering the free will of a party by excessive pressure
Unconscionability (defenses)
when a contract has unfair terms that are unfair from the start, like inconspicuous or incomprehensible terms, a court may refuse to enforce it
When can a duty be discharged or excused without performance?
express condition did/didn’t occur
waiver of condition
other party’s breach
insecurity about other party’s performance
changed circumstances (impossibility, impracticability, frustration)
subsequent agreement
Express condition did/didn’t occur
If an event occurs that triggers performance doesn’t happen, you don’t have to perform. Or if it says if this happens you don’t have to perform
waiver of condition
If there is a condition, the one who has the benefit of the condition can indicate that they will not insist on the condition being met
Other party’s breach
if one party breaches, the other party is excused. Must be material (anticipatory repudiation) for common law
Anticipatory repudiation
If before the time to perform one party clearly indicates they won’t perform
Insecurity about other party’s performance
If party words or actions give reasonable grounds for insecurity, party can depamnd adequate assurance and suspend performance until he gets it. If not provided, performance is excused
Impossibility
Things like death or incapacity of a person necessary to carry out the contract, subject of contract becomes illegal, or subject of contract is destroyed
Impracticability
party has encountered extreme and unreasonable difficulty or expense in perfmance (material shortage or difficulty due to war, embargoes, catastrophic crop failure, shutdown of supplier). Mere increase of price is rarely sufficient
Frustration
if the purpose of the contract was known to both parties and becomes valueless due to an unforeseen circumstance, the duty may be discharged
Subsequent agreement
recession, accord and satisfaction, modification, novation
Recession
when the contract is not fully performed, both parties can discharge by having an agreement to rescind (call off) contract
accord and satisfaction
a new contract to an existing contract that changes the performance of the contract. Needs consideration Satisfaction is the performance of the accord
Modification
The changing of terms in a contract discharges those terms in the original contract, not the entire contract. Needs mutual assent and consideration for common law
Novation
two og parties entering into a new contract that changes one of the parties. same performance, different party
What if a party fails to perform?
they breach the contract
common law breach
has their been substantial performance?
Common Law: minor breach
the promisee (receiving performance) receives substantial benefit of what was bargained for. Pay for the work done
Common Law: material breach
causes the contract to immediately end and you can sue
common law breach factors
non-breaching party can be compensated with money
amount of benefit the non-breaching party received
extent of performance
hardship of the breaching party
if breach was willful or negligent
likelihood breaching party will fully perform
time is only material if it is important to the contract (has to be performed at/by a specific time)
UCC breach
determined by if there has been perfect tinder or not
Perfect tinder rule
Goods and delivery that conform perfectly to the contract in every aspect
If no perfect tender:
reject all nonconforming goods and cancel contract and sue
accept goods and sue for damages
accept commercial units of goods, reject the rest, and sue for damages
Exceptions to the perfect tender rule
acceptance, right to cure, installment contracts
Acceptance of goods
after a reasonable opportunity to inspect goods, buyer indicates that they conform
buyer fails to reject (take goods without saying anything)
buyer does something that indicates they are no longer the sellers (using the goods)
exception to acceptance of goods
if accepted due to difficulty of discovering defects or because of assurance that the goods conform, buyer can revoke acceptance if they don’t conform
right to cure
if there is time left to perform the contract, the seller can make it right by sending conforming goods
exception to the right to cure
when a seller sends non-conforming goods that they reasonably believe would be accepted but aren’t, the seller upon reasonable notification to the buyer has reasonable time beyond the original contract to perform
nonconforming goods in installment contracts
if an installment substantially impairs the value of the installment and can’t be cured. It’ll be a breach of the whole contract only if the nonconformity substantially impairs the value of the entire contract
remedies for breach
make the non-breaching party in the position he would have been in if there had been no breach
types of remedies
compensatory damages, reliance damages, liquidated damages, partial recovery with deductions, lost volume, mitigation, specific performance, cancellation, restitution, rescission and reformation
compensatory damages
aka monetary damages including incidental damages and consequential damages that you know might result of your breach
compensatory damages in warranty cases
in contracts with warranties that guarantee the goods will have certain qualities, the compensatory damages don’t have to be all or nothing. you can keep defective goods and get damages for the difference in price.
reliance damages
if damages are too speculative, the court may grant reliance damages, the cost incurred based on reliance of the contract