What are the 3 measures of stress?
Social readjustment rating scale (SRRS)
hassles and uplifts scale
Skin conductance response
What does the SRRS measure?
The degree of adjustment required by various life events
Who devised the SRRS?
Holmes and Rahe
Describe Holmes and Rahe’s procedure to devise the SRRS
examined medical records of 500 patients
made of 43 life changes made which occurred in the months prior to patients illness
100 judges told an arbitrary value of 50 LCU for marriage
asked to rate 42 other events relative
What idea does SRRS use as a basis for measure of stress?
That higher adjustment for life change causes more stress which leads to physical illness (immunosuppression)
What LCU score meant an 80% likelihood of illness?
300 or more
How likely were you to become ill if you had an LCU score of 200-299, or 150-199?
50% or 33%
Who devised the daily hassles and uplifts scale?
Kanner et al (1981)
How many items is the daily hassles scale made up of?
117
How many items is the uplifts scale made up of?
135
Describe the procedure of Kanner et al when devising the hassles and uplifts scale in 1981
100 participants asked to complete scale each month for 9 months
would tick which they had experienced that month
What were the findings of Kanner et al’s procedure
Positive correlation between high hassles scores and stress/health problems
Negative correlation between high uplifts scores and stress/health problems BUT this was only in women
Describe how the skin conductance respinse (SCR) would be carried out
electrodes attached to middle and index finger
tiny current released
increase in sweat coincides with increase in conductance, producing readings of a ‘polygraph’ against a baseline measure
What is the baseline/non-stressful measure in SCR also known as?
Tonic conductance value
What is the measure in response to a stimulus in SCR also known as?
Phasic conductance value
SRRS evaluation - strengths
Supporting evidence - Rahe et al - >2000 sailors
Practical applications - used to prevent stress related illness - doctors
SRRS evaluation - limitations
Conflicting evidence - Kanner et al comparison to H+U scale
Doesn’t distinguish between positive and negative changes - vacation 13 LCU
Methodological concerns - correlation not = causation
Hassles and uplifts scale - strengths
Supporting evidence - Kanner et al comparison to SRRS
Practical applications - used to prevent stress-related illness - doctors
SRRS evaluation - limitations
Methodological concerns - retrospective (memory), correlation not = causation, ambiguous (open to interpretation)
Less scientific than SCR as self-report
SCR evaluation - strength
Supporting evidence - Harrison et al (2006) - infants stress vs non-stress
Practical applications - used in lie detector tests - law enforcement for guilt
SCR evaluation - limitations
Individual differences - people differ systematically due to physiology
Cannot distinguish between different emotional states
Not fully accurate - Villarejo et al (2012) - 23% failure rate