part a row 1
three main parts to argument— must have all of them
demonstrate understanding of entire argument/main idea as a whole, not just a specific sentence as the argument
part a row 2
explain LOR
connect claims to supporting evidence
detailed connections/conversations between claims and how they lead into each other
whether the placement of claims is effective or ineffective
how the author convinces audience of argument
part a row 3
evaluate 4 sources from the text
explain how evid contributes to argument well — is it relevant/supporting
evaluate the credibility of the argument and whether a scholarly source is referenced
suggest what evidence or perspectives the argument is missing that could have advanced the argument
part b row 1
find a slightly unique and less obvious theme in the sources— annotate sources and look for similar phrases and ideas mentioned very briefly
avoid cliche arguments or ones very explicitly referred to in the sources
include other perspectives, possibly including anecdotal evid from a student perspective or general knowledge, in the argument
integrate sources so commentary is driven by student voice
part b row 2
signposted LOR
use three sources for a backup
have a counterclaim
point out limitations of a source or argument (good for a counter)
detailed commentary
part b row 3
put sources in conversation with each other (draw comparisons, point out minute similarities, or contrasting arguments)
student-driven, not source-driven, argument