Neuroplasticity

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 10

11 Terms

1

Maguire (2000) Terms to define

  • Neuroplasticity

  • Naural networks

  • Neural pruning

New cards
2

Maguire (2000) Aim

To investigate whether changes could be detected in the brains of London taxi drivers and to further investigate the functions of the hippocampus in spatial memory

New cards
3

Maguire (2000) Procedure

  • Natural experiment

  • The participants were 16 male, right-handed male London taxi drivers

  • Their MRI’s were compared with MRI’s of another 50 male non-taxi drivers (control group)

  • Researchers were trying to see if there was a relationship between the number of years drivin and the anatomy of the brain

New cards
4

Maguire (2000) Results

  • The posterior (back) hippocampi rewas significantly larger in thaxi drivers

  • The anterior (front) hippocampi was smaller in taxi drivers than in control subjects

  • The hippocampal volume of the right hippocampus in each taxi driver correlated with the amount of time spent driving (the back part of the right hippocampus grew larger and the front part shrank)

  • The larger posterior hippocampi made the taxi drivers more proficient at spatial memory and navigation

New cards
5

Maguire (2000) Evaluation

  • Demonstrates the plasticity of the hippocampus in response to environmental demands

  • The changes in hippocampal grey matter, at least on the right, are acquired

  • The environmental demans of being able to navigate a complex structure of streers led the taxi drivers to develop more pronounced posterior hippocambi tha the control subjects

New cards
6

Draganski (2004) Terms to define

  • Neuroplsticity

  • Neural networks

  • Neural pruning

New cards
7

Draganski (2004) Aim

To see whether learning a new skill (juggling) would have an effect on the brains of participants

New cards
8

Draganski (2004) Procedure

  • 24 volunteers all non jugglers

  • Divided into two conditions: 1. Juggles, 2. Non jugglers (control condition)

  • Both conditions had an MRI to start with

  • After, the jugglers were tought how to juggle and notifiy the researchers when they had mastered it

  • The jugglers had a second MRI

  • Were told to stop practicing juggling

  • They had a third MRI three months after stopping

  • To analyse the MRI scans they used voxel-based morphometry to determine if there was significant differences in neural density (grey matter) in the brains of jugglers vs non-jugglers

New cards
9

Draganski (2004) Results

  • From the baseline (first) scans, taken before the study began, there was no significant regional differences in grey matter between the two conditions

  • At the end of the first part of the study, jugglers showed more grey matter in the mid temporal area

  • After the jugglers stped practicing, the amount of grey matter decreased

  • There were no changes in the control condition

New cards
10

Draganski (2004) Evaluation

  • Juggling relies more on visual memory than on procedural memory

  • Procedural memory would more likely show change in the cerebellum or basal ganglia

New cards
11

Neuroplasticity and studies general evaluation

  • Neuroplasticity can be observed at multiple scales, from microscopic changes in individual neuron to larger-scale changes like cortical remapping in response to injury

  • The role of behavior in the brain cannot be observed “live”

  • Research is generally correlational in nature (prospective in nature)

  • Low in internal validity as it is not possible to control for extraneous variables

New cards
robot