1/12
Evo Bio Exam 3
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Negative Directional Selection
large individuals = less fitness
smaller guys stick around
decrease in mean through the production of variance
variance decreases
fitness decreases with trait value
Variance
describes the distribution or spread of observations/ individuals in population
high variance = high spread
low variance = low spread
Positive Directional Selection
fitness increases with trait value
mean increases
variance decreases
changes in mean happen initially through shifts in variance
Flower size in high elevation alpine skypilots is what type of selection?
positive directional selection
more flare of the flower = more fit
produce more pollen
Lizards body sisze in proportion to the egg survival is what type of selection?
positive directional selection
big males produce eggs that survive better than small males
Stabilizing selection
individuals w/ intermediate trait values have the highest fitness
extreme no good
after selection, you lose ends w/ extremes
reduction in variance with no change in mean
population is already at highest fitness so mean doesn’t want to change
most common in nature
What can you say about the selection differential (S) for stabilizing selection?
its very close to 0
Stabilizing selection example #1
fly lays egg on weed —→ causes goldenrod gall growth
egg hatches out in larvae and lives in gall
provides protection from wasp
small gall does not protect well from wasp
Big gall:
larvae runs to other side and is safe, protects itself
bigger galls better if you are a fly
positive directional selection
Wood peckers:
notice bigger galls, peel open and eat larvae
Result:
high variance at first
+ and - directional selection combine to create a net stabilizing selection
middle point = compromising fitness
most common in nature
net stabilizing selection
different selective processes can work at different points in the overall function
Why is stabilizing selection most common in nature?
selection forces combine
often already removed unfit variants, moving population to a mean close to that with the highest fitness
measuring selection in nature can be difficult
new mutations happen every generation and often reduce fitness

no phenotypic variation in the population, so selection cannot be measured
might appear as though there is no relationship between trait and fitness
How can you measure selection when natural phenotypic variation is low?
create phenotypic variation

Widowbird tail length example
males have long tails + elaborate display where they fly slowly
but everyone has long tails
Experiment:
measured tails + divided birds into groups randomly
bird with long tail, chopped tail off and put on another bird so they would have super long tails
positive directional selection
females like to mate with males w/ long tails
Disruptive selection
individuals with extreme trait values have the highest fitness
mean value of the trait does not change
variance increases