1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
"[Not quite at ease, half shy, half assertive]" Act 1
-This is a stage direction describing Gerald's demeanor when he first appears. Though everyone is in a celebratory mood,
Gerald's body language and tone hint at internal conflict
-Juxtaposition - Priestley uses contrasting adjectives to show that Gerald is conflicted or uncomfortable. "Shy" suggests nervousness, guilt, or insecurity. "Assertive" implies he is trying to maintain control or confidence. Reflects his dual nature — he wants to seem respectable, but he's hiding something
-Foreshadowing - The audience later learns about Gerald's involvement with Eva Smith. This subtle direction foreshadows his guilt and adds depth to his character
-Tone - Shows discomfort or unease, even in a moment of celebration. Hints to the audience that Gerald may not be entirely truthful or sincere.
"What about war?" Act 1
-This moment occurs during Mr. Birling's speech where he boldly claims that war will never happen and that the Titanic is unsinkable. Eric, hearing his father's arrogance and optimism, questions him
-Direct Question - The short, sharp question "What about war?" interrupts Mr. Birling's speech — showing Eric's scepticism and discomfort with his father's views. It reflects youthful uncertainty or curiosity
-Dramatic Irony - The audience knows two world wars happened after 1912 — this makes Mr. Birling look ignorant and foolish, especially since he says war is impossible. Eric's question becomes a tool for Priestley to challenge complacency and blind optimism, especially in the older generation
"I don't know - really. Suddenly I felt I just had to laugh" Act 1
-This line comes when the family is gathered at the dinner table, celebrating Sheila and Gerald's engagement.
Eric's sudden laughter appears inappropriate and awkward
-Hesitation - "I don't know - really" - Eric's uncertainty is shown through his vague, broken speech, suggesting he's anxious or trying to hide something. The dash shows a pause or internal conflict, making him seem nervous or uncomfortable
-Sudden Emotion - The word "suddenly" implies a lack of control — Eric is reacting impulsively, which suggests emotional stress. His need to laugh could be a defence mechanism, possibly to hide guilt, fear, or confusion
"You're squiffy" - Sheila to Eric Act 1
-Sheila says this during the Birling family's dinner to celebrate her engagement to Gerald. It's early in the play, and this comment is one of the first signs of tension and informality between the younger characters
-Colloquial Language - The informal tone shows how casual and open Sheila is with Eric. Suggests a more relatable and realistic sibling relationship for the audience.
-Foreshadowing - Eric's drinking problem becomes important later, especially when we learn he was heavily drunk during his involvement with Eva Smith. Sheila's comment is light-hearted, but it hints early on at a more serious issue that he and the family are trying to downplay
"Just keep quiet Eric, and don't get excited" Mr Birling to Eric Act 1
-This line is said when the Inspector has just arrived and begun questioning the Birlings. Eric shows signs of nervousness and emotional reaction, and Mr. Birling quickly tries to shut him down.
-Imperative verb - Mr. Birling uses a blunt, commanding tone to silence Eric. Shows that he sees authority and control as important — especially over the younger generation. Suggests dismissiveness, as though Eric's voice isn't valuable or welcome
-Minimising Emotions - "Excited" is an understatement — Eric is anxious or even distressed. Mr. Birling is trying to suppress emotional reactions, showing that he values public appearance over honesty or emotional truth. Reflects the older generation's discomfort with vulnerability or emotion.
Summary - Eric at the start:
-Awkward and out of place
-Drinks too much - coping with guilt
-Shows early signs of empathy
-Not respected by his parents
-Clearly hiding something, building suspense
-Priestley sets him up for major devolpment
"[Eric enters, looking extremely pale and distressed. He meets their inquiring stares]" Stage direction Act 2
-This happens just before Eric is properly questioned by the Inspector. By now, the audience already suspects Eric's involvement with Eva Smith
-Adjective -These visual cues show Eric's guilt, fear, and emotional turmoil. "Pale" suggests shock or sickness, often associated with fear or remorse. "Distressed" makes clear that he is suffering emotionally, indicating a level of conscience that sets him apart from his parents.
-"Meets their inquiring stares" - Suggests that the family is already suspicious or demanding answers. Eric is being judged before he speaks — creating tension. This moment builds sympathy for Eric, as he is clearly under pressure and isolated.
"He's been steadily drinking too much for the last two years" - Inspector about Eric Act 2
-This is revealed during the Inspector's questioning of the Birlings. It comes before Eric's full confession, and acts as a revelation to both the audience and the family.
- Adverb "Steadily" - Suggests that Eric's drinking wasn't a one-time mistake, but a long-term pattern. Implies neglect — no one in the family noticed or helped, highlighting emotional distance
-"Drinking too much" - Drinking here symbolises escapism, guilt, or a lack of control. Reinforces that Eric has been struggling internally, even before the events of the play.
"You killed her- and (..) my child - your own grandchild (...) you don't understand anything. You never did" Act 2
-This is said by Eric to his mother (Mrs. Birling) after he discovers that she refused help to Eva Smith — not knowing at the time that Eva was carrying Eric's child. Eric is in shock, grief, and fury — it's the moment where all emotional tension explodes.
- Direct address - Sharp, blunt and emotionally raw. Eric directly blames his own mother, showing how far the family has broken down. Reflects moral clarity — he sees right from wrong, regardless of familial loyalty.
- Emotive language - the use of "my" and "your" forces personal responsibility. The phrase humanises Eva's death — it's no longer a distant tragedy, but deeply personal. "Grandchild" gives the death a generational weight, making Mrs. Birling's coldness even more shocking
-Ellipses (...) - Reflects Eric's emotional struggle to speak, possibly overwhelmed by guilt, anger, and sadness. Suggests rawness and breaking down under pressure.
"You're not the kind of father a chap could go to when he's in trouble" Act 3
-Eric says this to Mr. Birling in a moment of emotional confrontation. It follows Eric's confession about his involvement with Eva Smith and his deep regret.
-Colloquial language - Colloquial word "chap" makes it personal and relatable, showing Eric as an ordinary young man looking for guidance. "Could go to" implies trust and approachability — qualities Mr. Birling lacks.
-Direct address - "You're not the kind of father" - Accusatory tone — Eric directly blames his father for emotional neglect. The phrase "kind of father" suggests there are expectations of care, understanding and support that Mr. Birling has failed to meet
Summary - Eric in the middle:
He is emotionally and full of guilt
-Faces the consequences of his action
-Begins to clash with his parents, exposing their failings
-Becomes more honest and self aware, even as his flaws are exposed
-Priestley uses him to show how privileged men can abuse power,but also how some are capable of change
"The fact remains that I did what I did. And mother did what she did. And the rest of you did what you did to her" Act 3
-This is said after the Inspector has left and the family is debating whether the story was real or not. Mr. and Mrs. Birling are eager to forget it and move on, but Eric refuses
-Repetition - "Did what I did" is repeated three times — this reinforces the inevitability of their actions and the inability to erase them. Repetition builds intensity and gives the line a forceful, unwavering tone
-Anaphora - The structure "I did... She did... You did..." highlights each person's individual responsibility, making it impossible to hide behind collective blame.
-"Did" - the verb is in the past tense, but repeated to show that the consequences are still present
"My God-I'm not likely to forget" Act 3
-Eric says this in Act 3 after all the truth about his involvement with Eva Smith (and her death) has come out. The family is dealing with the fallout, and while Mr. and Mrs. Birling are trying to protect their reputation and downplay what happened, Eric expresses raw remorse and emotional pain.
-Emotive Language - The whole phrase expresses emotional intensity, revealing a genuine human reaction to the tragedy.
-Modal Verb: "Not likely to forget" shows certainty in his emotional response. The use of "not likely" suggests this moment is permanently etched in his memory — he is deeply affected.
"Your own grandchild... You killed them both - Damm you, Damm you" Act 3
-Eric has just confessed his involvement with Eva Smith and is overwhelmed by guilt. When he realises his mother refused to help Eva at the charity organisation, leading to her death and the death of her unborn child, Eric lashes out.
-Ellipsis ("Your own grandchild...") - The pause creates dramatic tension and shows Eric's struggle to process what he's saying. Emphasises the personal impact — it's not just a tragedy, it's a family loss.
- Repetition ("Damn you, damn you!") - Highlights Eric's anger and despair. The emotional repetition shows the depth of his rage, betrayal, and grief.
- "Killed": Harsh, loaded verb — shows Eric sees their actions as having fatal consequences, not just "mistakes."
"We all helped to kill her and that's what matters" Act 3
-After the Inspector leaves, the family debates whether the events were real. Mr. and Mrs. Birling are mostly concerned about their reputation. Eric, however, understands the moral weight of their actions, regardless of whether Eva Smith was one person or several.
-Collective Pronoun - "We all" - Highlights the shared responsibility each character had in Eva's death. Emphasises Priestley's socialist message: society must work together and recognise how actions impact others
-Direct Language - The sentence is clear and blunt, showing Eric's moral clarity at this point in the play.No euphemisms or deflections — he uses the word "kill", directly addressing the severity of their actions.
-"Kill": A harsh, emotional word that shows how deeply Eric feels about the situation — there's no sugar-coating here
Summary - Eric at the end:
-Fully accepts blame and his role in the death
-Shows guilt, emotional pain and maturity
-Clearly distances himself from his parents belief
-Represents the hopeful, changing younger generation
-Priestley uses him to show that social change is possible, but only if people face the truth