1/21
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
study designs
each offer diff advantages & disadvantages for valid group comparisons
trade-offs b/w feasibility (cost, ethics, time, etc.), & validity impacts what study design is best used
internal validity
do the observed results accurately reflect the true association?
external validity (generalizability)
to whom can results be applied
requires internal validity
**NOTES**
if a study lacks internal validity, external validity is irrelevant
we don’t compromise internal validity in an effort to achieve external validity (generalizability)
type of sources of errors
random & systematic
systematic error
selection bias
informaiton bias
confounding
error due to chance
random error
dots are spread out
error due to recognizable source
systematic error
dots are clustered
bias definition
systematic error in design or conduct of study that leads to incorrect estimate of association
bias sources
can be caused by investigator or study participants during design or conduct of study
can occur in experimental, cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, & ecological studies
not inherent characteristic of the study population
few studies have no bias or errors
bias effects
create appearance of an association when there is none, or mask an association that really exists
selection bias & information bias cannot be fixed in the analysis; confounding can be fixed to a point
bias solution
limit in study design & study conduct
critically evaluate after study has been completed, & discuss its effect
discuss:
bias type & sources
direction
magnitude
impact on study results & impact on study interpretation
direction of bias: towards the null
positive & preventive association is biased TOWARDS the null
true association is UNDERESTIMATED
direction of bias: away from the null
positive & preventive association is biased AWAY from null
true association is OVERESTIMATED
feasibility
cost, ethics, time, etc.
fundamental goal of study designs
estimate the truth
study samples allow us to estimate the truth among everyone
random and systematic error combo?
possible to have both source of errors
selection & information bias combo?
possible to have both types of bias
types of bias
selection bias
information bias
selection bias
WHO is in the 2×2 table
information bias
WHERE in the 2×2 table
summary
validity & feasibility determine what type of study design to
pursue
internal validity: do the observed results accurately reflect the true
association?
sources of error in estimating the truth: random & systematic error
3 types of systematic error or bias: confounding, selection bias, & information bias
direction & relative extent of bias (over- or under-estimate true association