classical conditioning (Pavlov)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/9

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

10 Terms

1
New cards

What is classical conditioning?

Learning through association, where a neutral stimulus becomes associated with an unconditioned stimulus to produce a conditioned response

2
New cards

Who developed classical conditioning?

Pavlov through experiments with dogs and salivation

3
New cards

What is an unconditioned stimulus (UCS)?

A stimulus that naturally produces a response (e.g. food)

4
New cards

What is an unconditioned response (UCR)?

A natural, automatic reaction to the UCS (e.g. salivation to food)

5
New cards

What is a neutral stimulus (NS)?

A stimulus that initially produces no response (e.g. bell)

6
New cards

What is a conditioned stimulus (CS)?

Originally neutral, but after association with UCS, it produces a response (e.g. bell after pairing with food)

7
New cards

What is a conditioned response (CR)

Learned response to the CS (e.g. salivation to bell)

8
New cards

What was pavlov’s experiment?

Dogs were presented with food (UCS), salivation (UCR), bell (NS) paired with food, bell became CS, salivation became CR

9
New cards

Strength of this experiment

Scientific credibility: based on controlled experiments (Pavlov’s dogs), producing reliable data

Practical applications: used in therapies like systematic desensitisation for phobias

Influence: foundation for behaviourist psychology and later learning theories

10
New cards

Limitations of this experiment

Animal research: findings may not generalise fully to humans

Reductionist: focuses only on observable behaviour, ignoring cognitive and emotional factors

Deterministic: suggests behaviour is entirely shaped by associations, ignoring free will