Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
property dualism
the theory of mind that claims there is only one kind of substance - physical substance - and two fundamentally different kinds of properties - mental and physical properties
Jackson’s knowledge argument (standard form)
Mary knows all the physical facts about seeing colour whilst in a black and white room
on being released, Mary learns a new fact about seeing in colour
therefore, not all facts are physical facts (i.e. facts about phenomenal properties)
therefore, physicalism is false and phenomenal properties are non-physical
objections for knowledge argument
Mary gains ability knowledge
Mary gains acquaintance knowledge
she gains new knowledge about a fact she already knew
first objection (Mary gains ability knowledge)
she does not gain propositional knowledge, she gains ability knowledge; how to discriminate between colours and recognise these colours by sight
second objection
Mary knows everything that happens with brains when they experience colour but her brain has never been in that state, so when she sees red she becomes acquainted with the experience
third objection (new knowledge old fact)
when Mary leaves the room she gains some new concepts (phenomenal concepts), and she can apply these new concepts to her mind in a way that she could not before
but that phenomenal concept is metaphysically identical to her brain states (which Mary already has knowledge of)
chalmer’s zombie argument
masked man fallacy
i believe a masked man robbed the bank and i believe that that man is not my father
so it is conceivable that my father and the masked man are not the same
but imagine im wrong and my father is the masked man, then it is metaphysically impossible that the masked man and my father are not the same
so conceivability tells us nothing about metaphysical possibility
logical possibility
logical possibility does not infer metaphysical possibility
metaphysical possibility
something is metaphysically possible if it is logically possible
it is constrained by identity and the essential nature of things
arguments against dualism
problems of other minds
interaction problem; conceptual and empirical
the category mistake
interaction problem
how do changes in physical properties cause, or relate to, changes in mental properties when they are so fundamnetally different
Chalmer’s response to the interaction problem (interactionist response)
he notes that even though the two properties are fundamentally different they have a causal relationship similar to mass and space which are also fundamentally different
epiphenomenalism response
claims that mental properties have no causal power instead changes in mental properties occur as a by-product of physical processes
so we are mistaken in our belief that mental properties cause behaviour these behaviours are in fact being caused by underlying physical processes