1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Role of Courts
The role of the courts is to interpret legislation and create law through setting precedents.
Binding Precedent
The common law principle by which the decisions of courts higher in the hierarchy, are binding upon courts in the same hierarchy where the material facts are similar.
Persuasive Precedent
A precedent will be considered persuasive if the facts are similar, but the decision was made by another court hierarchy or by a court at the same level or below in the same hierarchy.
Ratio Decidendi
Reason for deciding. (Binding part of a precedent)
Obiter Dictum
statements made by the way.
Stare Decisis
Stand by the decision
Ejusdem Generis
Of the same kind
Ex Post Facto
After the act or omission took place
Reversing
when, on appeal, the Appellate Court disagrees with the point of law that decided the matter in the first place, and hence gives its decision in favour of a different party.
Overruling
when in a latter and separate case a higher court decides a similar matter on the basis of a different legal principle.
Disapproving
when in a latter case, without overruling an earlier case, the court gives its opinion (in the obiter dictum) that the earlier case was wrongly decided.
Distinguishing
when in a later and separate case the court draws some point of difference or distinction between the facts of the earlier case and the one before the court.
Strengths of Precedent
Creates certainty and consistency with comparable cases
Flexibility (RODD)
Efficiency - Judges can refer to previous cases when making a decision
Allows Judges to create laws as the need arises
Weaknesses of Precedent
Inflexible ( bound by previous decisions)
No two case are ever the same so hard to compare
Restricted by ex post facto
Statutory Interpretation
is the process by which courts determine the application of words, terms and phrases used in Acts of Parliament and delegated legislation.