The Big Five Personality Dimensions

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 1 person
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/15

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Lecture 6

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

16 Terms

1
New cards

Personality Theories - Trait versus Type

personality type = psychological classif. of different people e.g. introverts vs extroverts

personality trait = psychological classif. of different levels e.g. introversion + extroversion continuum; many people in middle.

assumes personality relatively stable over time/across situations.

2
New cards

Lexical Hypothesis (Francis Galton)

important individual differences become encoded as single terms. number of words for each trait = importance of trait.

term to describe personality trait will be in any/all languages.

3
New cards

Eysenck’s PEN Model

measure psychoticism-normality, extroversion-introversion, neuroticism-emotional stability dimensions on a continuum.

4
New cards

Big Five Factors (Costa & McCrae, 1992)

extroversion = gregarious, assertive, positive

neuroticism = anxiety, depression, hostility

agreeableness = trustful, honest, altruistic

conscientiousness = competent, disciplined, considerate

openness = open to feelings, novel actions, ideas

5
New cards

Social Correlates of Openness

Colbert et al. (2013) - trait included as leadership quality

Berry & Hansen (1996) - associated w/ disclosure in social interactions

Brandt et al. (2015) - more tolerant of diverse views. intolerant if not in line with own views.

6
New cards

Social Correlates of Conscientiousness

Tang et al. (2018) - associated with low Facebook addiction

Bogg & Roberts (2013) - evidence supports integration of conscientiousness into public health and medical research. optimal traits may foster better health

7
New cards

Social Correlates of Extroversion

Eisenkraft & Eifenbein (2010) - 48 workgroups - each group 4-5 individuals. complete big five measure. high extraversion/low agreeableness = more likely to elicit neg. emotions in colleagues.

8
New cards

Social Correlates of Agreeableness

Witt et al. (2002) - agreeableness associated with improved job performance via improved cooperation.

Liu et al. (2018) - anger promotes neg. interpersonal relationships. moderated by agreeableness.

9
New cards

Social Correlates of Neuroticism

Mandelli et al. (2014) - neuroticism (in stress) correlated with depressive severity - independent from current depressive state.

Denissen & Penke (2008) - neurotic individuals react with heightened sensitivity to threatening social cues.

10
New cards

Big Five - Advantages

  • same factor structure across diff. languages, racial groups, ages (Costa & McCrae)

  • has predictive validity e.g. conscientiousness predicts fidelity/faithfulness in relationships

atheroetical approach + traits derived from data = minimises researcher bias

11
New cards

Big Five - Critique

lack of explanatory power - cannot explain why structure of personality traits falls into five clusters.

does not include evaluative traits e.g. moral/immoral → HEXACO model adds honesty-humility to Big Five.

  • Boyle et al. (1995) - found questionable methodological decisions e.g not testing simple structure of factor analytic solutions/weighting self-report data more heavily.

  • Cattell et al. (2002) - evidence changes to personality occur across lifespan; is not constant

12
New cards

Big Five/Personality Critique - Walter Mischel

personality traits not stable across situations - behaviour product of situation, not personality.

personality one variable among many that influence behaviour - danger in relying too heavily on personality measures.

13
New cards

Transactional Model of Stress and Coping (Lazarus & Folkman, 1987)

stress = interplay between individual and environment. 

primary appraisal (significance) → secondary appraisal (controllability) → coping efforts:

  • problem-focused = managing stressful encounter

  • emotion-focused = regulating emotional responses to stressful encounter

14
New cards

Emotion Regulation

person’s ability to manage emotions/respond to emotional experience.

context/experience may influence emotional regulation strategy.

15
New cards

Process Model of Emotion Regulation (Gross & Thompson, 2007)

  • situation selection = act to make emotional experience more/less likely

  • situation modification = problem-focused coping

  • attentional deployment focus = redirect attention within situation

  • reappraisal = change thought process to modify emotional impact

  • response modulation e.g. suppression = down-regulating aspects of emotion

16
New cards

Personality Traits and Emotional Intelligence (Hughes et al., 2020)

  • high neuroticism → sensitive to neg. affect, seek to reduce immediately.

  • high agreeableness → heightened sensitivity to others’ emotions

  • conscientiousness correlated with problem-solving

  • openness correlated with thought-based strategies e.g. reappraisal