Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Outline the procedure of Asch’s research. Make sure to include:
Participant information
How many trials
Confederates?
What was the DV?
123 American men
After 3 trials confederates gave false answers
5 confederates with one participant
How often participants conform and give an incorrect answer
What were the findings of Asch’s baseline study?
Participants conformed 36.8% of the time
75% of participants conformed at least once
Control with no confederates was conducted and mistakes were only made 1% of the time
What explanation of conformity could explain these findings? Why?
Normative social influence (NSI)
Most of the participants said that they knew their answers were incorrect, but they went along with the group in order to fit in, or because they thought they would be ridiculed
What were the three variations of Asch’s research?
Group size
Unanimity
Task difficulty
Group Size: what relationship did Asch find between group size and conformity? What does this mean? Add statistics to back up your explanation.
Found a curvilinear relationship between group size and conformity
Conformity rates were low with 1 or 2 confederates but jumped to 31.8% when there were 3 confederates
Little increase in conformity after 3 confederates
Group size: does NSI or ISI best explain conformity here? Why?
NSI
As group size increases, so does the pressure to conform to the group's norms and expectations
Unanimity: how did Asch investigate this variable?
Adding a dissenter (gives a different answer to confederates) to the group
Unanimity: what did Asch find when he investigated unanimity? Use statistics to back up your point.
Found conformity decreased by 75%
This is regardless whether dissenter gave a correct or incorrect answer
Unanimity: does NSI or ISI best explain conformity here? Why?
NSI
Allowed participant to act more independently (as chose correct answer even when dissenter chose incorrectly)
Task Difficulty: How did Asch study this and what did he find?
Increased the difficulty by making the differences between the lines smaller
Found conformity significantly increased
Task Difficulty: does NSI or ISI best explain conformity her? Why?
ISI
Shows that ISI can explain conformity as when we are unsure we look to other people for the right answers
Why is it a limitation that Asch’s research was conducted using a lab study?
Low external validity
Less applicable to real life scenarios
How can we criticise the sample? Why is this an important limitation of Asch’s research into conformity?
Only American males were used
Females (tested in Jennes jellybean study) are more conformist than males
America has and individualist culture (making participants more likely to conform than collectivist cultures)
Only tests the conformity of a small group
What are potential ethical issues of this study? Why is this problematic?
Participants were not told the real aim of the study
Deception: thought confederates were other participants
Therefore they must be debriefed afterwards
What research did Lucas et al. (2006) conduct? How does this research both support and refute Asch’s findings in conformity?
Asked students to give answers to mathematical problems that were easy or more difficult
Support: higher levels of conformity for difficult questions (supporting ISI explanation)
Refute: the maths ability of the participant could vary their level of conformity.
What research did Perrin and Spencer conduct? How did it show that Asch’s findings might be a child of its time? What does this actually mean?
Repeated Asch’s original study in 1980 with engineering students
Only one student conformed in a total of 396 trials
May be due to engineering students being more confident about measuring lines
Possible that in the 1950s (very conformist period), so made sense to conform to establish social norms
Society changed great deal since 1950s, becoming less conformist