LEGL Exam 2

5.0(1)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/119

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Law

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

120 Terms

1
New cards
Promise
A commitment or willingness to be bound to a contract obligation
2
New cards
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
The most successful attempt to have states adopt a uniform law
Purpose is to simplify, clarify, and modernize the laws governing commercial transactions
3
New cards
Goods
Tangible (touchable), movable personal property
4
New cards
Bilateral Contract
Promise in exchange for a promise
Involves promisor and promisee
Usually made to a specific person
Acceptance, then performance later
Binding even when promise hasn't been fulfilled yet
Ex) work order to paint house
5
New cards
Unilateral Contract
Promise in exchange for an action
Made to the whole world
Acceptance and performance happen at the same time
Not binding until action has been done
Ex) lost dog poster and reward
6
New cards
Express Contracts
A contract in which parties show their agreement in words
7
New cards
Implied-in-fact Contracts
A legally enforceable agreement inferred from the circumstances and conduct of the parties
8
New cards
Implied-in-law Contract
A quasi-contract; not a true contract
Legal fiction that the courts use to prevent unjust enrichment and wrongdoing
Courts permit the person who conferred a benefit to recover the reasonable value of that benefit
Nonetheless, the elements of a true contract are not present
9
New cards
Quasi-contract
An implied-in-law contract; not a true contract
Legal fiction that the courts use to prevent unjust enrichment and wrongdoing
Courts permit the person who conferred a benefit to recover the reasonable value of that benefit
Nonetheless, the elements of a true contract are not present
10
New cards
Enforceable Contract
A contract that can be enforced in court
11
New cards
Unenforceable Contract
A contract that cannot be enforced in court
12
New cards
Valid Contract
A contract that contains all of the proper elements of a contract
13
New cards
Void Contract
A contract that is empty, having no legal force; ineffectual, unenforceable
Ex) drug sale, killer-for-hire
14
New cards
In Pari Delicto
The parties to an illegal contract are equally at fault
15
New cards
Voidable Contract
Capable of being declared a nullity, though otherwise valid
Party taken advantage of can avoid contract; other party cannot
16
New cards
Executed Contract
A contract that is fully accomplished or performed, leaving nothing unfulfilled
17
New cards
Executory Contract
An agreement that is not completed
Remains this state until the performance required in a contract is completed
18
New cards
Offer
A contractual communication that contains a specific promise and a specific demand
Definite, present intent to be bound to a contract
Initiates the process of making a contract
19
New cards
Indefiniteness
When the terms of an agreement are not sufficiently specific, the agreement does not rise to the level of a contract
20
New cards
Revocation
The contractual communication of withdrawing an offer
Cannot be done upon completion of performance
21
New cards
Rejection
The refusal of an offer
Terminates an offer
Cannot be reversed
22
New cards
Counteroffer
An offer made in response to another's offer
Acceptance must be for as it is
Usually made in place of an acceptance
Usually terminates an offer
23
New cards
Lapse of Time
When the offeree fails to accept by a deadline defined in the offer or after a reasonable period of time
24
New cards
Subject Matter Destruction
When the object of the contract is destroyed or legally eliminated
25
New cards
Offeror Death or Insanity
When the offeror no longer has the capacity to make the offer
26
New cards
Subject Matter Illegality
Offer is automatically revoked if illegal
Also Subsequent Illegality
27
New cards
Acceptance
The contractual communication of agreeing to another's offer
Creates a contract
28
New cards
Mirror Image Rule
The common law rule that the terms of an acceptance offer must mirror exactly the terms of the offer
Any variation of terms would make the attempted acceptance a counteroffer
29
New cards
Mailbox Rule
The rule that an acceptance is effective once it is sent
30
New cards
Deposited Acceptance Rule
The contractual doctrine that a binding acceptance of an offer occurs when a mailed acceptance is irrevocably placed with the postal service
31
New cards
Consideration
Contracts must be two-sided to be enforceable
32
New cards
Accord and Satisfaction
Payment of money, or other thing of value, usually less than the amount demanded, in exchange for cancellation of a debt that is uncertain in amount
33
New cards
Firm Offer
An offer in signed writing by a merchant to buy or sell goods; it gives assurance that the offer will be held open for acceptance under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
34
New cards
Option
A contractual arrangement under which one party has for a specified time the right to buy certain property from or sell certain property to the other party
Essentially a contract to not revoke an offer
35
New cards
Promissory Estoppel
Court enforcement of an otherwise unbinding promise if injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise
Substitute for consideration
36
New cards
Capacity
Mental ability to make a rational decision that includes the ability to perceive and appreciate all relevant facts
Required element of a contract
37
New cards
Covenants Not to Compete
An agreement in which one party agrees not to compete directly with the business of the other party; may be limited by geography or length of time
38
New cards
Fraud
A false representation of fact made with the intent to deceive another that is justifiably relied upon to the injury of that person
39
New cards
Misrepresentation
An untrue manifestation of fact by word or conduct; may be unintentional
40
New cards
Mutual Mistake
A situation in which parties to a contract reach a bargain on the basis of an incorrect assumption common to both parties
41
New cards
Rescission
A contractual remedy that cancels the agreement and returns the consideration exchanged to each party
42
New cards
Unilateral Mistake
Arises when only one of the parties to a contract is wrong about a material fact
Not usually a basis for rescinding a contract
43
New cards
Duress
Being under threat of physical harm or illegal economic harm
A recognized defense to any act that must be voluntary in order to create liability in the actor
44
New cards
Undue Influence
A defense to contract enforcement available when one is taken advantage of unfairly by a party who misuses a position of relationship or legal confidence
45
New cards
Leading Object Rule
An exception to the statute of frauds' writing requirement for collateral promises
Occurs when the promisor's commitment is primarily intended to serve the promisor's own interests
46
New cards
Leyden v. American Accreditation Healthcare Commission (2015)
- Enforcing implied-in-fact agreements is an important means of ensuring that two parties' intent to make binding promises is honored
- Implied-in-fact agreements must contain the same elements as express contracts, including acceptance and consideration
- Employers can weaken the presumption of an at-will employment relationship by making statements about employee rights and expectation in policies and manuals
47
New cards
Gottlieb & Co., Inc. v. Alps South Corporation (2007)
- The court found that Gottlieb's term (consequential damages limitation) was included in the contract even though it appeared only on Gottlieb's forms and was not specifically discussed by the parties
- Alps' failure to read Gottlieb's forms was irrelevant, according to the court. This is generally true as a contract law principle
- If Alps foresaw the likelihood of certain outcomes, such as consequential damages from customer complaints, it should have addressed it with Gottlieb
48
New cards
Vassilkovska v. Woodfield Nissan, Inc. (2005)
- Contracts require consideration for both promises. Care must be taken in limiting one's obligations, particularly if the result is no legal detriment at all
- The amount of consideration is generally not an issue, but it must be more substantial than simply an acknowledgement or statement
49
New cards
Parol Evidence Rule
When a written contract exists, it is very strong evidence
Excludes the introduction of evidence of prior written or oral agreements that may vary, contradict, alter, or supplement the present written agreement
Exception example:
- When the parties to an agreement do not intend for that agreement to be final and complete, then parol evidence is admissible
50
New cards
Duty of Performance
Legal obligation of a party to a contract
51
New cards
Discharge
Act that forgives further performance of a contractual obligation
52
New cards
Condition Precedent
Event that must occur before a duty of immediate performance of the promise arises
Contracts often provide that one party must perform before there is a right to performance by the other party
Ex) Completion of a job is needed for payment for that job. One contracting party's failure to perform this permits the other party to refuse to perform, cancel the contract, and sue for damages.
53
New cards
Condition Subsequent
A fact that will extinguish a duty to make compensation for breach of contract after the breach has occurred
54
New cards
Express Conditions
Conditions that are explicitly set out in a contract
55
New cards
Implied Conditions
Conditions to a contract that are implied by law rather than by contractual agreement
56
New cards
Concurrent Condition
Mutual condition under which each party's contractual performance is triggered by the other party's tendering (offering) performance
57
New cards
Delivery
The physical transfer of something
In sale-of-goods transactions, transfer of goods from seller to buyer
58
New cards
Tender Performance
The offer by one contracting party to perform a promise; usually associated with the offer to pay for or to ship items under the contract
59
New cards
Complete Performance
A party performs all of its obligations under a contract
60
New cards
Material Breach
Materially deficient or nonexistent performance of one's obligations under a contract
61
New cards
Substantial Performance
Degree of performance recognizing that a contracting party has honestly attempted to perform but has fallen short
Entitled to the price promised by the other less that party's damages
62
New cards
Impossibility of Performance
A defense to contractual nonperformance based on special circumstances that render the performance illegal, physically impossible, or so difficult as to violate every reasonable expectation the parties have regarding performance
63
New cards
Commercial Impracticability
A Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) defense to contractual nonperformance based on happenings that greatly increases the difficulty of performance and that violate the parties' reasonable commercial expectations
64
New cards
Waiver
An express or implied relinquishment of a right
65
New cards
Release
The relinquishment of a right or claim against another party
66
New cards
Compensatory Damages
Usually awarded in breach-of-contract cases to pay for a party's losses that are a direct and foreseeable result of the other party's breach
The award for these damages is designed to place the non-breaching party in the same position as if the contract had been performed
67
New cards
Consequential Damages
The amount of money awarded in a breach-of-contract case to the non-breaching party to pay for the special damages that exceed the normal compensatory damages
May be created by lost opportunities if the breaching party was aware of the special nature of this contract
Can be unlimited
Domino effect of damages
68
New cards
Punitive Damages
Monetary damages in excess of a compensatory award, usually granted only in intentional tort cases where defendant's conduct involved some element deserving punishment
69
New cards
Liquidated Damages
Simple compensation stated in contract
70
New cards
Mitigate
To lessen the consequences of
Usually used to refer to the contractual duty to lessen damages following breach of contract
71
New cards
Equitable Remedy
A remedy fashioned by a court when money damages are not adequate (i.e., there is "no adequate remedy at law")
Ex) Injunctions and rescission of a contract
72
New cards
Restitution
A contractual remedy involving one party returning to another the value previously received
73
New cards
Injunction
A court order directing a party to do or to refrain from doing some act
74
New cards
Specific Performance
Equitable remedy that requires defendants in certain circumstances to do what they have contracted to do
75
New cards
Third-party Beneficiaries
Persons who are recognized as having enforceable rights created for them by a contract to which they are not parties and for which they have given no consideration
76
New cards
Assignment
A transfer of contractual rights
77
New cards
Assignor
An original contracting party who assigns or transfers contractual rights to a third party
78
New cards
Assignee
A third party, who is not an original contracting party, to whom contractual rights are transferred
May enforce the original contract
79
New cards
Delegate
A transfer of contractual duties
80
New cards
Delegator
An original contracting party who delegates or transfers contractual duties to a third party
81
New cards
Delegatee
A third party, who is not an original contracting party, to whom contractual duties are transferred
Will perform under the original contract
82
New cards
Anti-assignment Clause
A contractual provision that prevents a party from assigning rights or delegating duties without the permission of the other party
83
New cards
Novation
The substitution of a new contract in place of an old one
84
New cards
St. Louis Produce Market v. Hughes (2013)
- The failure of a condition precedent can excuse a party's performance, even if it is minor. Similarly, the existence of a minor condition subsequent can cut off a party's obligation to perform
- Parties often use conditions to ensure that a transaction occurs under favorable and anticipated circumstances
- Parties should carefully consider whether conditions are necessary and understand that they may, at times, provide hold-up power to one side
85
New cards
East Capitol View Community Development Corp. v. Robinson (2008)
- Courts are reluctant to excuse performance due to impossibility or impracticability
- The court specifically distinguishes between objective impossibility and personal impossibility. Only the former excuses performance
- Contracting parties have the ability to allocate known risks in the contract. For that reason, impossibility must be an unexpected ocurrence
86
New cards
Oliver v. Ball (2016)
- When a contract involves unique subject matter, courts may award specific performance because there is no amount of money that can make up for the failure of the contractual promise
- Land is a common context for the award of specific performance because it is such a unique asset
87
New cards
Contract Law
Tension between freedom of contract and consumer/public protection
88
New cards
Elements of a Contract
Agreement (offer and acceptance), capacity and genuine assent, consideration, lawful purpose, lawful form
89
New cards
Leonard v. PepsiCo (2000)
Determined that the Harrier Fighter jet that was not on the catalog was NOT an offer
90
New cards
Lack of Capacity
One party is too young or mentally incompetent to form a contract
91
New cards
Lack of Genuine Assent
1) One party was tricked (fraud) or forced (duress)
2) Both parties were confused about essential part of contract (mutual mistake)
92
New cards
Lucy v. Zehmer (1954)
Zehmer's drunkenness when entering contract did not excuse him out of the contract
93
New cards
Johnson v. Harmon (1876)
"Both minds must meet in such a transaction; and if one is so weak, unsound, and diseased that the party is incapable of understanding... he is incompetent"
94
New cards
Exceptions for Contracts without Capacity
Contracts for necessaries, ratified contracts, emancipated minors, under certain state laws
95
New cards
Coogan's Law
CA Child Actor's Bill
Exception of contracts without capacity
96
New cards
Sherwood v. Walker (1887)
Contract for selling of barren cow that wasn't actually barren was mistake of character
Contract was void
97
New cards
Wood v. Boynton (1885)
Selling of valuable stone that turned out to be a diamond is mistake of value
Since diamonds are valuable stones, contract was NOT void
98
New cards
Gratuitous Promise
Non-legally-binding promise
99
New cards
Nominal Consideration
Token amount identified in a written contract when parties either cannot or do not wish to state the amount precisely
Ex) The Freemasons of Lodge St. George, Bermuda
- Price of yearly rent is one peppercorn
100
New cards
Pre-existing Obligation
Can't use something you already are required to do as consideration
UCC has exception for good-faith modifications to sales of goods