1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
close of the treaty era:
by 1921 (after treaty 11) gov decided no more treaties with FN (lasted until 1975) - we had dealt enough with land claims/titles etc (they were tired and annoyed)
treaty 9 - northern part of ontario; 1905-1909 two parts signed
treaty 10 - northern chunk of saskatchewan and somewhat in MB
treaty 11 - mckenzie valley area
post-confederation treaties: (5)
established a legal and political framework intended to govern the coexistence of various communities in a shared space
largely with the intent to open up the west for settlement from the govs point of view
treaties were (SUPPOSED) to be nation to nation agreements (none of the numbered treaties were ever passed through parliament) but canada never passed them through parliament and only made the orders in council
except for treaties 1, 2, 3 which were negotiated, the text for the remainder of the treaties was given by ottawa and there was little room for negotiation
there were outside oral agreements negotiated by the treaty commissioners, but still they were totally ignored by Ottawa
all of the numbered treaties have what?
an extinguishment clause
extinguishment clause: (3)
the said indians do hereby cede, release, surrender and yield up to the government of the dominion of canada, for his majesty the king and his successor for ever, all their rights, titles and privileges whatsoever, to the lands included within the following limits
government of canada demanded that this clause be included in every treaty until 2016 deliberately avoided discussions of land in the treaty negotiations
can first nations ever “extinguish” their relationship to the land - did they understand this - is this what FN were trying to do in making treaty (obviously not)
treaty 9: reasons for treaty (3)
CPR and grand trunk northern railway (now CN) railway lines brought an influx of new traders but most importantly prospectors into the area - issues with white settlers ignoring conservation of species as key to trade
open the territory for mineral exploration
extension of ontario’s boundaries meant that indian title had to be resolved (st. catharines milling case)
treaty 9: (8)
text of treaty already negotiated and decided between ottawa and ontario - no room for negotiation with FN (just sign here)
schools were promised - no agricultural equipment or twine for fish nets despite requests for them
gov promised:
$8 for signing & $4 annuity ($25 in previous treaties & $5 in annuity)
right to continue hunting and trapping over their traditional territories - largely ignored by ontario who continued to issue licenses to white trappers, timber licences, and mineral exploration
reserves of 1. sq mi per family of 5 - reserves had to be confirmed by ontario which was generally not cooperative - may be sold with consent of FN and may be appropriated for public works
chief receives flag and copy of treaty (no uniform, medal or special payment)
FN promised:
to uphold the treaty
obey the law and maintain peace
treaty 10: (5)
many requests from FN who had heard about treaty 6 (south) and treaty 8 (west) but were largely ignored
some rumour of a train line through the area although not undertaken in this period
pressure from métis scrip
federal government not interested in areas with no agricultural potential and wanted to leave FN to hunting, trapping, fishing way of life
1905 creation of saskatchewan provided necessary impetus
treaty 10 terms: (5)
gov promised:
1 sq. mile reserve land per family of 5 (with usual conditions allowing for gov expropriation)
education as government deemed necessary
right to continue hunting, trapping and fishing except on land needed for mining, forestry etc.
annuities: $5 per person, $15 per headman, $25 per chief, +$12 signing bonus
annual distribution of ammunition and twine with unspecified help in agriculture
treaty 11: (6)
despite numerous requests from FN, their concerns were totally ignored
number of surveys of the population undertaken by indian affairs, all indicating a different situation - also requests from missionaries, RCMP, HBC all ignored
not until the discovery of oil fields after WW1 and in particular a well at norman wells in 1920 did the gov see any point in negotiating treaty
FN most concerned with the protection of hunting and fishing rights which the commissioners blithely confirmed
lots of people missed during negotiations and had to be added in later after the fact
reserves were never established
treaty 11 terms: (7)
gov promised:
reserves of 1 sq mile per family of 5 with usual conditions allowing gov appropriation
right to hunt, trap, fish over entire territory except where required for mining, lumber etc.
signing payment of $12 per person, $22 per headman, $32 per chief
annuity of $5 per person, $15 per headman, $25 per chief
suit of clothing for every headman every 3 years, medals and flags when treaty signed
schools - already one at fort providence
agricultural tools, $50 of hunting and fishing equipment to each family upon signing and $3 of hunting and fishing equipment annually
by the end of the numbered treaty process in 1921, most of canada except…
QUEBEC
BC
NORTHWEST TERRITORIES
NEWFOUNDLAND/LABRADOR
was covered by treaties
treaty process exacerbated the divisions between…
first nations and métis
although canada allows for the surrender of aboriginal title to the crown, this does not mean…
that it is surrenderable under aboriginal law
treaty 9, 10, 11 elders have all testified…
that there was no discussion of surrendering the land in treaty negotiations