Unipolarity stability + theories

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
New
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/8

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

9 Terms

1
New cards

How did the world enter a unipolar world order?

  • When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the USA became the global hegemon, since there was now no other state that could compete w it globally. Therefore the world entered a unipolar world order. While the threat of nuclear was diminished theorists debate whether this has created more, or less, stability

2
New cards

Points for Unipolarity = stability

hegemonic stability theory

Actions of the USA as a ‘hegemon’ (case study)

Impact of US hegemony on global affairs:

3
New cards
  • Explanation of hegemonic stability theory

  • A hegemonic that is seen + accepted by other states as benign (benevolent/ good), can act as a global policeman + help to keep order + promote stability, as aggressors are deterred + other states ‘bandwagon’ to the hegemon

4
New cards
  • Actions of the USA as a ‘hegemon’ (case study)

  • US ideals of free-market liberal democracy triumphed (‘end of history’) achieving a ‘pax Americana’- USA was perceived as a legitimate global leader w other states looking up to it politically, economically, culturally. E.g. First Gulf War 1991 gained global support + UN mandate to defend Kuwait from Iraq

5
New cards
  • Impact of US hegemony on global affairs:

  • Other lesser powers were deterred from challenging the established order - inter-state conflict reduced due to USA’s significant global military presence

  • Global trade increased due to greater trust + belied in stability of the international order (DPT)

6
New cards

Points for Unipolarity= instability

  • Waltz’s argument

  • E.g.s of unstable unipolarity (US decline)

  • Radical theory- Malign hegemony (Chomsky)

7
New cards
  • Waltz’s argument That unipolarity = instability 

  • Other emerging powers may resent the hegemon as they may feel constrained in their ability to maximise their security + power

  • When the hegemon is declining in power, this can encourage others to challenge it (power transition)

8
New cards
  • E.g.s of unstable unipolarity (US decline):

  • Failure to win wars in Afghanistan + Iraq

  • Economic weakness (caused 2008 financial crisis)

  • China’s increasing assertiveness/ class of Civs

  • Russia’s willingness to annex Crimea + invaded Ukraine

  • Step down from global leadership= Obama/ Syria; Trump NATO/ Paris climate agreement

9
New cards
  • Radical theory- Malign hegemony (Chomsky)

  • One state becoming a hegemon is dangerous as there are no constraints on what it can do, so encouraging it to act in their own interests, outside international norms/ global governance

  • Hegemon become a ‘rogue superpower’ - e.g. US invaded Iraq w/out UN mandate