1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
What factors cause market failure?
Externalities, where the utility of one individual depends on the consumption and actions of other agents
The pricing of public goods in private markets doesn’t result in efficient allocations
Some firms become large enough that they have sufficient market power to become price-setters rather than price-takers
If information is incomplete trade might be impeded resulting in inefficiencies
The tragedy of the commons
This is a common example of how externalities cause market failure
Take a common good, lie a pasture for grazing which many farmers use; if farmers aren’t conscientious about their actions, they might overconsume leading to depletion of the public good; in the same way, their utility depends on the actions of other farmers
How might externalities be positive or negative?
Externalities are exogenous factors which affect an agent, or the side-effects of transactions between two parties which affects a third uninvolved party
They can be positive and negative; positive things are those like education, vaccinations, the appearance of a neighbours house, negative externalities are things like smoking, pollution, and chewing loudly
This distinction helps us to know what is over or under-produced and create policy to address this
Negative externalities graph
The equilibrium at Q is one where the good is overproduced because it doesn’t account for the overall social cost; it only cares about the private/monetary cost
This means there is a deadweight loss, which can be addressed by things like Pigouvian taxes

How can markets be made more efficient in the face of negative externalities?
The main way to restore efficiency is to internalise the externality; account for the extra social cost the good has when selling it
Thus, one should impose a tax or subsidy on it dependent on whether it is negative or positive
It could also be interpreted as a missing market; pollution causes damage to air, but there is no market for clean air so it is difficult to value it
What do Pigouvian taxes do?
The idea is to include the extra social cost a good has (negative externality) in the price of the good when selling it
This adjusts the Private Marginal Cost so that it is equal to the Private Marginal Benefit at the social optimum
The tax is set equal to the Marginal Damage which is the difference between the Marginal Social Cost and the Private Marginal Cost
Pigouvian Tax diagram

How to calculate a Pigouvian tax
Find the social optimum quantity
Find the demand and supply prices at this quantity
To find the optimal tax, compare the demand price with the supply price at the social optimum outcome: subtract the supply price from the demand price
How to determine the socially optimal quantity?
Set demand and supply equal, Xd = A - P / α, and Xs = B + P / β and solve for price P = (βA - βα) / (β + α), the price without externality
Plug this into supply/demand to get the equilibrium quantity: Xd = (A + B) / (β + α)
This quantity is wrong because it doesn’t account for externality cost, CE(x) = (δx)2 = δ2x2
Social optimum is where MSB = MSC, so we need to find both curves
MSC is comprised of MPC and MEC. To find MEC, differentiate total cost, = 2δ2x
The MPC is the inverse of the supply function, MPC = βx - B
MSC = MPC = βx - B + 2δ2x
Assuming no positive externalities, MPB = MSB = A - αx
Set MSB = MSC for optimal quantity, x* = (A + B) / (β + δ2 + α)
How do we calculate the demand and supply price at the social optimum? Then calculate the optimal tax.
To find the demand price set the socially optimal quantity equal to the demand function and solve to find Pd = (A(β + 2δ2) - αβ) / (β + 2δ2 + α)
This is the price consumers must face such that they’ll want to buy the socially optimum quantity
To find supply price, set the socially optimal quantity equal to the supply function to get Ps = (βA - B(α + 2δ2)) / (β + 2δ2 + α)
To find the optimal tax, subtract the supply price form the demand price to obtain, T* = (2δ2(A + B)) / (β + 2δ2 + α)
This tax is the vertical gap between the demand curve and the MPC curve at the social optimum
What is Coase Theorem?
This is another solution to the externality problem which involves creating a new market to help refine the value of the negative impact (ie, introduce property rights to the element which impacts utility)
In such a case, polluters would be forced to pay an extra cost for externalities
Coase suggests that this procedure wouldn’t distort allocation efficiency in the market so long as there are no transaction costs and preferences are quasilinear
What are public goods?
They possess the properties non rivalry (one agent consuming the good doesn’t prevent another from consuming it) and non-excludability (agents can’t be excluded from benefitting from the good)
They are usually provided in the same way to all consumers (so that everyone receives a similar amount)
Properties of these goods aren’t clear-cut so there are intermediaries between private goods and public goods
What does private provision of public goods refer to?
If agents choose their contribution to a public good privately, this is a game where we contribute, and then based on total contributions we get to enjoy the good
Agents who benefit less from the good are more likely to contribute less and thus free-ride, which can lead to the under-provision of public goods in private markets
What is government provision?
Refers to the case in which, due to underprovision in the private market, the government provides the main public goods, like public defence, or education
It might be difficult for a government to determine how much public good to provide, as they don’t know each persons benefit
Thus, they should charge different prices to agents, proportional to their willingness to pay according to the Lindahl equilibrium
How can a government gauge social preferences?
The government might do a survey or vote; ask individuals to rank alternatives and use a rule to aggregate individual preferences into one social choice
Unfortunately, results aren’t method-independent and are victim to Arrow’s impossibility theorem
The government could also construct social preferences by aggregating individual utility functions
We could derive a utilitarian social welfare from a weighted sum or a Rawlsian social welfare function by picking the minimum utility each agent gets and then choose the option which maximises the chosen social welfare function