Company Law Revision

studied byStudied by 1 person
5.0(1)
Get a hint
Hint

Why do businesses raise finance?

1 / 254

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

255 Terms

1

Why do businesses raise finance?


• Purchases premises to operate, plant and machinery
• Employ staff
• Obtain advice of professional advisers I.e accountants
• Expand and grow business

New cards
2

Key facts about partnerships

• Created without any formalities
• Governed by PA 1890
• Does not need to be any intention to form a partnership - 2 or more people can do so.
• Section 2 of PA 1890 provides a set of rules for determining the existence of a partnership

New cards
3

Although it's not required, why is it preferable to have a partnership agreement drawn up by a solicitor?

To prevent the agreement being governed by the default provisions of PA 1890 eg...

• Partners share profits and losses equally in the business even where the parties have contributed to the capital unequally. Provision in an agreement can provide a sharing ratio

• Partners are not entitled to a salary

• A partner cannot be expelled by the majority vote unless all of the partners have previously expressed a majority to do this.

New cards
4

Who do the profits and losses belong to?

A company and not the shareholders, the company is therefore liable for its own debts.

New cards
5

What law governs companies? What does it do?

Companies are governed by the Companies Act 2006 which superseded Companies Act 1985. Companies act contains detailed requirements regulating how companies are run, filing and disclosures which must be made by companies at Companies House.

• Primary aim of CA 2006 was to simplify the law for private companies.

New cards
6

What key changes were made in CA 2006?

• Removal of requirement for private companies to hold Annual General meetings (AGM) or submit annual returns

• Codification of directors' duties

• Allowing private companies to pass shareholder resolutions in writing, dispensing with the requirement for meetings of shareholders

New cards
7

What key changes were made in CA 2006?

• Removal of requirement for private companies to hold Annual General meetings (AGM) or submit annual returns

• Codification of directors' duties

• Allowing private companies to pass shareholder resolutions in writing, dispensing with the requirement for meetings of shareholders

New cards
8

Key facts about subscribers

• Name given to first shareholders in a company who invest

New cards
9

Key facts about directors

• Officers/ managers of the company

• Day to day running of board

• Known as the board

• Directors are often shareholders in small companies

New cards
10

Key facts about persons with significant control

Key
• Generally shareholders with over 250 shares

New cards
11

What type of companies are there?

• Private companies limited by shares
• Private companies limited by guarantee
• Unlimited companies

New cards
12

Key facts about private companies limited by shares

• Most common company

• No minimum share capital requirements

• Prohibited from offering shares to the public

• Can be formed by one per⁸son

New cards
13

Key facts about private companies limited by guarantee

• No share capital

• Liability of members is limited

• Membership is not transferable

• Companies are relatively rare

New cards
14

What act were companies governed by prior to Companies Act 2006?

Companies Act 1985

New cards
15

What did CA 1985 require a company to have? And what are they?

Memorandum - declaration of the rules subscribers. Companies could set constitutional restrictions but were required to have an objects clause (sets out reasons for company formation, acting outside of the purpose is described as ultra vires).

Articles of Association - internal documents and rules to specify the regulations for a company’s operations

New cards
16

Wha do companies under CA 2006 have?

Unrestricted objects. CA 2006 provides object clauses of companies that acted under CA 1985 to continue in force

New cards
17

What must articles comply with?

Minimum provisions of CA 2006 (known as the legality test). Some may be more onerous than others. Important to check procedure in relevant legislation and client's articles.

New cards
18

Public company definition by s4(2) CA 2006

A public company is a company….whose certificate of incorporation states that it is a public company.

New cards
19

Name difference between a public and private company

Public ends in either public limited companynor plc whereas private company does not

New cards
20

Share capital difference between a public and private company

A public company must have a share capital with a nominal value of at least £50,000. Whereas for a private company, there is no requirement to have any specified amount of share capital.

New cards
21

Number of directors difference between a public and private company

Public company has a minimum of two directors and private companies has a minimum of one

New cards
22

Company secretary difference between a public and private company

Public company must have a company secretary who has requisite knowledge. A private company can choose to have a company secretary but not obliged to have one

New cards
23

AGM difference between a public and private company

Public companies are required to have one AGM (s336 CA 2006) whereas private companies are no longer required to

New cards
24

Regulation difference between a public and private company

Public company are able to offer shares to public thus require increased regulation. Whereas private companies do not offer shares to public

New cards
25

What happens if a new company doesn’t register articles at Companies house

S20 (1) CA 2006 provides that the relevant model article will constitute the companies article in default

New cards
26

A company's three choices of articles

  1. Model Articles

  2. Amended MA

  3. Tailor made articles

New cards
27

What are tailor made articles?

Client instructs a solicitor to draft articles that are tailor made for the company

New cards
28

How can a company amend articles?

Company can alter articles through special resolution (s21 (1) CA 2006). Special resolution is a decision of the shareholders. The basic rule is that to be valid, any alterations must be made bona fide in the interest of the company as a whole (Allen v Gold Reefs (1900)).

New cards
29

Nature of contract established by articles of a company?

S33 (1) CA 2006 which provides that the provisions in the companies articles bind the company and its members to the same extent as if there were covenants on part of the company

New cards
30

Incorporating a company

  • Submitting relevant info to companies House- memorandum, articles, incorporation fee, application for registration (Form IN01), statement of capital and initial shareholdings, statement of company's proposed officers, company limited by guarantee, statement of compliance, name of company, company’s registered number and date of incorporation

  • Shelf company conversion

  • Purchase of shelf company followed by formalities to enable necessary changes.

New cards
31

What is a shelf company?

A company in existence but not yet trading. , directors and the company secretary will be required to become either first members, subscribers, directors and company secretary of the company. Essential for:

  • Shares held by subscribers and transferred to client

  • Clients representatives are appointed as directors

  • First director and company secretary resign from positions

New cards
32

What is a share capital?

  • Shares purchased by first members of the company known as ‘subscriber shares’

  • Further shares issues after the company has been incorporated

Shares are allotted when a person acquires the unconditional right to be included in the company's register

New cards
33

What are the types of director?

  • Executive director - director who has been appointed to an executive office. Spends majority of time working on a business

  • Non-executive director - officer but not employee of the company. Do not take part in day to day running

  • Shadow directors - directors act on advice given by him in professional capacity.

  • Alternative directors - attends board meetings and acts in the director’s place.

  • De facto directors - someone who assumes to act as a director but in fact has not been validly appointed.

  • De jure director - validly appointed by law

New cards
34

How are directors appointed?

The CA 2006 does not provide a procedure for the appointment of directors, instead MA states that “any person who is willing to act as a director and is permitted by law to do so may be appointed to be a director:

  • By ordinary resolution for shareholders

  • Decision of the directors

New cards
35

What is an executive director?

Employee of the company who is given a written contract of employment.

New cards
36

What is a resolution?

A way in which shareholders and directors can vote to affect decisions on behalf of the company.

  • Decision of directors are taken by board resolutions in board meetings.

  • Decisions of shareholders are taken by passing shareholder resolutions, either by meeting of shareholders in a GM or in writing

New cards
37

What fundamental decisions cannot be taken by directors until they receive authorisation from the shareholders to do so?

  • Making of changes to the company’s constitution

  • Approval of certain transactions between directors and company

  • Formal declaration of dividends

New cards
38

What are ordinary resolutions?

Resolution passed by a simple majority (more than 50% of votes)

New cards
39

What is a special resolution?

Requires a majority not less than 75% (s283 (1) CA 2006)

New cards
40

How do shareholders vote?

  • Vote on a show of hands/poll

  • Vote at a GM

Member of the company is entitled to appoint a person as his proxy to exercise all or any of his rights

New cards
41

What is a quorum?

Where a company only has one member, one person is sufficient to constitute a quorum for a GM

New cards
42

Facts about general meetings

  • If there is a shareholder resolution required then there must be a shareholder meeting

  • Board’s responsibility to convene general meetings

  • Board must decide when a GM will take place

New cards
43

Process of holding a GM by the board?

  1. BM - held to decide the issues to be considered at a GM. The notice of the GM will be sent out

  2. GM - on the day appointed, the GM will take and shareholders will vote on resolutions set out in the notice.

  3. BM - a further BM will be held and the directors will be informed as to how shareholders voted at the GM

  4. Post meeting matters - carried out by a company secretary or a director

A private company, a GM may be called on short notice

New cards
44

What is a written resolution procedure for private companies?

Board resolution - MA allows directors to take decisions in the form of directors’ written resolution.

Ordinary and special resolution - private companies may pass a shareholder

Copied of all resolutions must be sent to the registrar of companies within 15 days of it being passed. If procedures not followed, the resolutions passed at meetings may be invalid

New cards
45

What is a sole trader? Advantage and disadvantages

Exclusive owner of the business, not a separate legal entity.

+can start trading immediately

+no setup costs/formalities

+can keep all profits

+ control over decision making

+complete privacy as no disclosure requirements

+sole trader is not a separate legal entity

-unlimited personal liability

-contracts are formed between the sole trader and third parties

New cards
46

What is a partnership? Advantages and disadvantages

2 or more people own the business and share the profits. Partnership is not an legal entity

+can start trading immediately

+not set up costs/formalities

+full control over decision making

-partners have unlimited personal liability

-contracts are formed between the partners

New cards
47

What is a limited liability partnership? Advantages and disadvantages

2 or more persons carrying on a business. Introduced by limited liability partnership act 2000

+all partners have limited liability

+partners can enter contracts with third parties

-setup costs and formalities as an LLP must be registered at Companies Hoise

-file annual accounts and has disclosure obligations

New cards
48

What is a private limited company? Advantages and disadvantages?

A private limited company is a separate legal entity, distinct from its owners.

+limited liability as shareholders are only liable to pay any amount unpaid on their shares

+require 1 person to incorporate a company

+easier to raise finance

-there are setup costs and formalities as a company

-CA 2006 is strict on how they run

New cards
49

Who do shareholders have rights to?

The company rather than directors and third parties whom the company does have a business contract with

New cards
50

Principle of seminal case of Saloman v A Saloman & Co Ltd (1987)

If company has insufficient funds to meet its liabilities, creditors cannot pursue their claims against shareholders

New cards
51

What does it mean for a company to be an independent legal person?

  • Company owns its own property

  • Company enters into its own contracts

  • Company sues and is sued on its own liabilities

New cards
52

Case of prest v petrodel

  • Family law case concerning distribution of assets on a divorce

  • Husband controlled a group of companies which owned a number of residential properties worth over £50 million

  • Wife sought an order to transfer the property to her on the basis that they were held by companies on trust.

  • Case went to supreme Court in which the judge decided that piercing the veil may exist as a matter of law but is rare.

In summary, where other routes to infer liability on shareholders are available eg tortious liability, law of trust or agency which do not ignore the company's separate legal person, the courts will infer liability on these principles

New cards
53

What does company's liability is limited mean?

Liability of shareholders to pay debt is limited. Shareholders are not liable to pay debts which the company owes its creditors because it is the obligation of the company to do so.

New cards
54

What are the consequences of separate legal personality and what is legal personality?

Legal personality is to be capable of having certain rights and duties with a certain legal system. Consequences:

  • The company owns its own property - property belongs to company and not shareholders. Key case: Macaura v Northern Assurance Co (1925) - Macaura (M) sold whole of timber on the estate to the company which he set up, M and nominees owned shares in the company and M creditor of the company in the amount of £19k. M took out insurance policies in his own name with Northern Assurance Co, covering the timber against fire. Two weeks later, a fire destroyed the timber. M brought a claim on the insurance policy and HOL claimed that timber belonged to the company, not to M thus he was unable to claim on the insurance policy despite owning majority of shares in the company.

  • The company enters into its own contracts - a company enters into contracts on its own behalf and the benefits and liability under the contract belong to the company, not the shareholders or directors. Key case: Lee v Lee Air's farming Ltd (1961) - Mr Lee incorporated Lee's farming ltd in New Zealand in 1954. The nominal capital of the company was £3k divided into 3000 shares od £1 each. Lee held 2999 shares whereas a solicitor held one. Lee was the sol

New cards
55

Consequences of legal personality pt2

Lee was the sole director of the company and was appointed as an employee in the company's articles. In 1956, Lee was killed in a plane crash whilst working and left a widow and four infant children. Lee's widow brought a claim under the worker's compensation act 1922 where the privy Council found that the company and Lee were distinct legal entities and therefore L under his contract of employment was a worker. Widow was entitled to compensation

  1. Company sues and is sued on its own liabilities. Key case: Adams v Cape industries pls (1990), Cape was a company of others, employees of the texas company became ill with asbestosis and sued Cape and NAAC. Judgment was entered for breach of duty of care. Issue before court of appeal was whether judgment could be enforced by the wealthier companies. Cape was present in the US texts and claimant argued that Cape and its subsidiaries should be treated as single economic unit, subsidiaries were used as a facade concealing the true facts and that Cape had an agency relationship with NAAC. court of Appeal rejected this and said judgment couldn't be enforced against Cape.

New cards
56

What is piercing the corporate veil

Piercing the corporate veil refers to a special instance where the court holds the shareholder or director of a corporation personally liable for the corporation's debts. Piercing the corporate veil is also known as veil-piercing, disregarding the corporate entity, or lifting the corporate veil.

New cards
57

Facts of saloman v saloman & Co (1897)

  • Saloman transferred his boot making business from sole proprietorship to company

  • Price for transfer was paid to saloman by way of shares and debentures having a floating charge.

  • When company’s business failed, it went into floating charge against the debentures who stood aprior to claims of unsecured creditors

  • Liquidator on behalf of the unsecured creditors alleged that the company was a sham and essentially an agent of Salomon who was personally liable for its debt.

  • Court of Appeal reasoned that saloman had incorporated the company contrary to the true intent of the Companies Act 1862

  • HOL upon appeal held that the company was duly incorporated

  • Saloman remains predominant and continues to underpin English law

New cards
58

Can a private limited company be formed with just one director and shareholder?

Yes, under CA 2006

New cards
59

Piercing the corporate veil and when?

When the courts go behind the corporate framework and company’s separate legal personality make shareholders of the company liable

Veil can be pierced where a person has an existing legal obligation or restriction deliberately evades or frustrates that obligation or restriction by setting up the company

New cards
60

When can a member of the company become liable?

Application of statutory

  • Employment

  • Taxation

  • corporate insolvency

Common law

  • Facade or sham

  • Single economic entity - established parent companies are not liable for subsidiaries.

  • Agency - liability based upon law of agency not lifting corporate veil

  • Tort - parent companies may be liable to those dealing with subsidiaries on the basis of tort

New cards
61

Elements of corporate contractual liability?

Capacity:

  1. Does the company have actual or deemed capacity?

    • CA 2006 companies yes (s31)

    • For pre CA 2006 companies, check memorandum and articles for objects clause

    • If transaction outside of company's powers, consequence was for it to be void and unenforceable (ultra vires)

  2. Authority

    • Does the agent have actual authority (express/implied)? - if yes, contract is binding. If no:

    • Does S40 CA 2006 remedy the defect and make the contract binding? If yes, contract is binding. If no:

    • Does the agent have ostensible authority? If yes, contract is binding but if not:

    • Does the rule in turquands case exist? Is reliance reasonable? If yes, contract is binding. If no:

    • Has the company ratified the act? If yes, contract is binding. If no, contract is not binding

New cards
62

What is general agency law?

An agent is appointed by a principal to act on their behalf. An agent contracts on the principals behalf and the contract will be entered into between principal and third party

New cards
63

When does a company come into existence?

Time of issue of the certification of incorporation by the Registrar of Companies (s16 CA 2006)

New cards
64

What is primary liability?

Where the company itself is said to have committed the tort through the acts of an individual which are attributed to the company

New cards
65

What is vicarious liability?

Employee of the company is individually liable for a tort but company is additionally vicariously liable for the person's act

New cards
66

What is the doctrine of ultra vires?

Refers to a situation where a body purports to act outside its power. The doctrine derives from public law as public bodies are granted certain powers that they are not permitted to go beyond eg company not permitted to act outside their objectives clause

New cards
67

What is doctrine of constructive notice?

A legal presumption that a party has notice when it can discover certain facts by due diligence or inquiry into the public records. A party found to have constructive notice cannot deny knowledge of a fact because that party did not have actual knowledge, since there is a duty to conduct due investigation.

New cards
68

What changes did CA 1985 introduce?

  • Memorandum could be altered by special resolution - companies

New cards
69

Authority in principals and agents

To bind a principle in the contract, the agent must be authorised either expressly or impliedly.

Eg implied actual authority from appointment to a specific role in the company or impliedly actual authority from a course of dealing

Deemed authority refers to the situation where an agent has no actual authority yet can still bind the principle.

  1. Statute (s40)

  2. Deemed authority at common law - ostensible authority (looks at relationship between principle and agent - freeman and lockyer v buckhurst park properties)

  3. Deemed authority at common law under the “indoor management” rule in Turquands case

New cards
70

Case of Turquand (1856)

  • Bank brought a claim for return of money owed by the company

  • Company argued that the manager who neogitated the loan should have been authorised a resolution of shareholders and as he had not obtained authorisation, the loan was void and company was unable to pay back the money

  • Doctrine of constructive notice was that the bank deemed to know the process of authorisation

  • Court held that only public docs should reveal that a resolution was required

The principle is that outsiders should be able to assume that the outsiders about to assume internal procedures, had taken those steps(referred to as indoor management rule)

New cards
71

When does the rule in turquand apply?

When there are potential questions over the execution of docs. The passing of authorising resolutions and the regularity of appointments.

New cards
72

What is ratification?

A company is able to ratify acts beyond actual authority of its agents provided that the act is with the appropriate company department (new Falmouth resorts Ltd v International hotels Jamaica (2013) - the agent had no actual authority go enter into a transaction but the company ractified it and thus no longer able to rely on lack of authority of the agent

New cards
73

Can a company rectify a contract before n came into existence

No , only possible for acts which could have been authorised by a company at the time

New cards
74

What is attribution theory

Doctrines of attribution are legal doctrines by which liability is extended to a defendant who did not actually commit the criminal act. Key cases include Lennards carrying co Ltd v aviation petroleum co 1915 ( concluded that once individual had been identified, person who has the required fault, that fault can be attributed to the company) and tesco supermarkets Ltd v nattras 1972 (tesco was charger with the offence of advertising goods at a reduces price and then selling them for a higher one. Tesco argued that the company weren’t at fault and the manager of that company actually was. Court found the manager not the guiding mind and therefore tesco could not be liable for his actions.

New cards
75

Company law 4 notes

New cards
76

What is a key element of shareholders control of power?

Power to vote on resolution and remove directors from the board (s168 CA 2006) and/or appoint new directors whose approach to managing the company the shareholders prefer

New cards
77

Where do powers of shareholders derive from?

CA 2006 and company’s articles. For shareholders to pass a resolution, they need to vote at either a general election or use written resolution procedure

New cards
78

General meeting facts

  • Called by directors (s302) by passing a board resolution at a board meeting

  • Board resolution is passed by majority of directors

  • Board must give 4 clear days notice of a General Meeting (s 307 (1) & s360) unless short notice procedure is used.

  • Short notice procedure - 90 percent of shareholder with voting rights agree then General meeting can take place ln short notice immediately after board meeting

  • If directors don’t call a GM, shareholders have the right to do so.

New cards
79

Bundle of rights?

Another word for shares. Measure of the shareholder’s interest in a company as a member and their right to vote

New cards
80

Definition of share?

No formal definition of share in CA 2006 but s 541 confirms shares as a personal property. Rights attached to a class of shares are determined in a company's article

New cards
81

Legal effect of articles?

  • S33 CA 2006, company’s articles will constitute a contract which is binding on the company and the members themselves

  • Members may bring an action against the company under s33 in their capacity as a member

  • Members can bring actions against eachother for breach of articles without joining the company.

New cards
82

Key case for the shareholders to act where the board directors is unable to do so?

Barron v Potter 1914

Case established that the shareholders of the company in a general meeting may act in place of directors where there is no board of directors competent or able to do so.

New cards
83

Directors obligations on receipt of s303 request?

Under s304 (1) CA, directors must call a GM within 21 days from receipt of request to be hold not more than 28 days of the notice of GM

New cards
84

Summary of shareholders calling a GM

S303: shareholders request the board to call a GM

21 days

S304: directors must call the GM within 21 days of the request to be held not more than 28 days later

28 days

S305: if directors do not call meeting, shareholders can do so themselves within 3 months

New cards
85

Shareholder resolution and their voting threshold

Ordinary resolution - requires a simple majority (more than 50 percent of votes cast in favour of the solution (s282 (1) CA 2006)

Special resolution- requires majority of not less than 75% (s283 (1) CA 2006).

If CA 2006 doesn’t specify what resolution to use then use ordinary resolution unless company articles require a higher majority (s281(3) CA 2006)

New cards
86

Quorum for GM?

Two shareholders under s318(2)

New cards
87

Regulations regarding written resolutions

Written resolutions must be sent to all eligible members. Limit of 28 days applies for all eligible members to respond which must be passed by all

New cards
88

Principle established in key case of Re Duomatic Ltd 1969

Principal that informal regulations agreed by all shareholders outside of a formal meeting will be valid and binding. For this principle to apply, there must be an unqualified agreement of all shareholders.

New cards
89

Why might shareholders vote in their own interest?

They are not under any fiduciary duty to the company and can vote as they wish regardless of whether it is in the company’s interests but they must act in a way that is bona fides (person's honesty)

New cards
90

What is working capital?

Funds needed to keep the business going

New cards
91

Capital

Refers to funds available to run the business of company

New cards
92

Share capital

Money raised by issue of shares

New cards
93

Issued share capital

Amount of shares in issue at any time

New cards
94

Initial subscriber

Whether person subscribe to the first share issued when the company is corporated

New cards
95

Share issue

Where a person acquires further shares issued by the company after incorporation

New cards
96

Share transfer

Where a person acquires shares by way of a transfer from an existing shareholder

New cards
97

Transmission

When the title to shares is devolved other than by transfer, typically applying to devolution by death

New cards
98

How to become a member of a company

Section 112 c a 2006 states to become a member, a person must be entered into the company's register of members

New cards
99

Presumption of shares

All shares gave equal rights unless there is an express provision in the articles

New cards
100

Types of share

Ordinary shares

redeemable shares

preference shares

non-voting shares

employees shares

cumulative shares

convertible shares

deferred shares

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 617 people
... ago
5.0(3)
note Note
studied byStudied by 14 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 91 people
... ago
5.0(3)
note Note
studied byStudied by 37 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 14 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 17 people
... ago
5.0(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 100 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 9 people
... ago
5.0(1)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (159)
studied byStudied by 1 person
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (21)
studied byStudied by 11 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (130)
studied byStudied by 14 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (82)
studied byStudied by 2 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (30)
studied byStudied by 16 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (89)
studied byStudied by 149 people
... ago
4.2(6)
flashcards Flashcard (28)
studied byStudied by 25 people
... ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (38)
studied byStudied by 16 people
... ago
5.0(1)
robot