1/37
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Main Conclusion
A statement of something that the writer (or speaker) wants the reader (or listener) to accept based on the reasons given.
Intermediate Conclusion
Secondary conclusion which ties back to the main conclusion
Argument
Conclusion + Reason(s)
Counterargument
An additional argument that's against, or counter to, what the conclusion seeks to establish.
Assertion
A forceful, confident reason regarding a belief or fact.
Counter-assertion
A contrary claim that is introduced without reasons backing it.
Evidence
Factual information is presented numerically or as statistical data in order to support reasons, which in turn supports the conclusion.
Claim
An unsupported conclusion
Reasoning
A statement that aims to persuade the reader to accept a conclusion.
Reliability
How much you can depend on reasoning/evidence to be factual.
R. Reputation
How well known a source is.
A. Ability to See
Whether or not the individual has the ability to see the event.
V. Vested Interest
Whether or not the individual has any reason to present information in a specific way.
E. Expertise
Whether or not the individual has any knowledge on the subject and how knowledgeable they are.
N. Neutrality (Bias)
How neutral (biased) an individual is in a given situation.
Unstated Assumption
A premise or idea that isn't said or written but is automatically thought by the speaker/writer.
Analogy
Like a similarity or comparison between something you already know to something u don't to help you understand.
Confusing Necessary and Sufficient Conditions
A necessary condition is a condition that must be present for an event to occur. A sufficient condition is or set of conditions that'll produce the event.
Slippery Slope
Starts off harmless and ends out disastrous.
Ad Hominem
To attack the person rather than dealing with the real issue in dispute
Tu Quoque
An arguer argues against something and proceeds to do the same.
Straw Man
An arguer gives very bad reasoning.
Post Hoc (False Cause)
To assume that just because one event come after another, that the first event caused the second.
Hasty Generalization
When you draw a conclusion based off a biased or too small of a sample.
Sweeping Generalization
The reasoning goes from some to all.
False Dichotomy (Either-or)
The arguer sets up a situation, so it looks like there's only 2 options, then eliminates the one that goes against the one they want.
Invalid Deduction: Affirming the Consequent
1. If A, then B
2. B
Therefore, A.
Invalid Deduction: Denying the Antecedent
1. If A, then B.
2. Not A
Therefore, not B.
Equivocation
To use an ambiguous word/phrase in more than 1 sense.
Conflation
The act of combining 2 or mor separate things into 1 whole.
Circular Argument
An argument that keeps returning to the same points and isn't effective.
Begging the Question
when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it.
Appeal to Authority
When we accept a claim because someone says that an authority figure supports it.
Appeal to Popularity (Band Wagon)
When an argument relies on public opinion to determine its outcome.
Appeal to Emotion
When someone tries to win an argument by evoking emotion without using facts or logic.
Appeal to Tradition
To ignore the evidence that should be changed because you've been doing it for a long time.
Appeal to Novelty
When a proposal is claimed to be better because it's newer
The use of reason or logic in an argument.