Reliability and Validity

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/21

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

22 Terms

1
New cards
Internal consistency
________: used to assess how well the different items measure the same characteristic by separating the items within a group and comparing the data with the idea that both scores will be the same.
2
New cards
Reliability
________: how consistently or dependently does a measurement scale measure what it is supposed to be measuring.
3
New cards
key concepts
In the study of personality, or more broadly, individual differences, two ________ within this area of psychometrics are reliability and validity.
4
New cards
Validity
________: whether or not it is reliably measuring what you want it to measure.
5
New cards
Concurrent validity
________: assesses the extent to which a measurement scale under development correlates with the "gold standard "by testing the developing scale with one that is either currently used or already created.
6
New cards
Convergent Validity
________: assesses the sensitivity of the scale, testing the hypothesis of how the scale will correlate to the measure.
7
New cards
Divergent Validity
________: assesses the specificity of the scale, testing the variance in results the scale gives in terms of the measure tested.
8
New cards
Note 1
The main purpose of this reading is to learn key concepts in psychometrics (i.e., metrics, or measurement, of psychological constructs)
9
New cards
Note 2
The authors describe a type of validity called discriminant validity
10
New cards
Reliability
how consistently or dependently does a measurement scale measure what it is supposed to be measuring
11
New cards
Test-retest reliability
a commonly used indicator of the reliability of a measurement scale where the measurement scale under development is administered on two different occasions to the same sample and the scores are compared
12
New cards
Internal consistency
used to assess how well the different items measure the same characteristic by separating the items within a group and comparing the data with the idea that both scores will be the same
13
New cards
Validity
whether or not it is reliably measuring what you want it to measure
14
New cards
Face validity
assessment of whether a measurement scale looks reasonable, are the items included in the scale relevant, questioned by experts/researchers
15
New cards
Content validity
measures whether a scale has included all the relevant and excluded irrelevant issues in terms of its content, assessed by an expert panel/compared literature/both
16
New cards
Concurrent validity
assesses the extent to which a measurement scale under development correlates with the "gold standard" by testing the developing scale with one that is either currently used or already created
17
New cards
Predictive validity
correlates the results of one scale with the results of a second scale that is administered later to measure how well the item or scale predicts expected future observations
18
New cards
Construct validity
when there is not a gold standard/current measure, testing to what extent the measurement scale under development correlates with the construct under investigation by defining the topic and stating/disproving a hypothesis
19
New cards
Convergent Validity
assesses the sensitivity of the scale, testing the hypothesis of how the scale will correlate to the measure
20
New cards
Divergent Validity
assesses the specificity of the scale, testing the variance in results the scale gives in terms of the measure tested
21
New cards
If a personality measure is reliable, does that mean it is valid too?
Yes, because if it is a reliable measure, the result will be consistent and therefore a valid measure of the result
22
New cards
What about if a measure is valid, does that mean it must be reliable?
No, because a measure could be valid for a certain circumstance but not applicable in other situations and therefore not a reliable measure for a specific result.