1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Definition
Govt (and govt agencies)-produced stats
Usually to see where funding/policies needed
Topics included in official stats
Health
Population
Finance
Tourism
Environment
Society
Travel
Advantage (esp for positivists)
Hugely representative due to massive sample size, which isn’t possible, especially for organisations
They also take great care to ensure representativeness
Hidden meanings in offical stats
“Violent crime recorded by police on the rise”
Could be due to better CCTV etc. and ways to record crime, as opposed to crime itself going up
“UK employment gone up since 2020”
‘Employment’ could include 0 hours contract/temporary/part time workers
“UK unemployment has gone down”
Could just be that the definition of “unemployed” has been changed (which it is… a lot)
5 practical positives
Free to access
Huge amounts of data
Easy to make comparisons between groups
Data colelcted at regular intervals
Can see trends and patterns over time
Cause and effect relationships can be seen
Can be used for the comparative method as specify different groups
2 practical negatives
Only the state can conduct such large-scale surveys and compel people to respond due to the cost
Therefore, the data produced will be what serves the state, not sociologists
Definitions of key terms may vary from sociologist to state
E.g. poverty, truancy
Can lead to different views about the scale of a problem
Ethics
Very good
Publicly available
Don’t breach personal confidences or cause harm to individuals
Validity
:)
Hard stats are valid as it’s very difficult to not record a birth/death/marriage
:(
If a state has specific interest or things they want to push under the rug, this will be reflected in stats
This means stats can be both inaccurate and incomplete, and therefore invalid
Soft stats are invalid
Soft stats = e.g. crime stats
Self-reported, not all crimes are reported by police, ‘dark figure of crime’ etc.
Reliability
:)
Are compiled in a standardised way
E.g. class = occupation for govt stats
Census is now online and automated so removes possibility of human error on either end
:(
Census coders can make errors when recording data from census forms
Public can fill in the census incorrectly
Views on official stats - positivists
Seen as social facts
True and objective measures of the real rate of e.g. crime
Use them to test hypothesis through the comparative method
Durkheim (1897) - suicide stats
Views on official stats - intepretivists
Official stats = social constructs
Represent labels people give to the behaviour of others, not the behaviour itself
Official stats ≠ valid, social facts
Atkinson (1971)
Need to use qualitative methods to truly discover an issue
E.g. suicide stats show more about coroner labelling than actual suicide levels
Views on official stats - marxists
Irvine (1987)
Official stats = ideology used to serve the means of capitalism
State ≠ neutral
Instead serves the interests of the captialist class to maintain the power of the Bourgeoisie
Official police stats
Used to hide the number of anti-govt demonstrations
Hides public opposition to capitalism
Unemployment stats
Changing definition of unemployment hides true negative effects of capitalism on the W/C