Battery & Assault

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/15

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

16 Terms

1
New cards

Battery definition- [R v Ireland]

  • ‘the defendant intentionally or recklessly applies unlawful force upon v’

2
New cards

Actus Reus: Battery

  • application of unlawful force must be applied to V.

3
New cards

Mens Rea: Battery

  • intentionally or recklessly applying unlawful force on V

4
New cards

E1 Battery. ‘Application’

  • must be applied to the victim

  • [DPP v K] The application of force need not be directly applied

5
New cards

E2 Battery. ‘Unlawful’

  • Must be unlawful

  • [Collins v Wilcock] more force was used than reasonably necessary

  • [R v Thomas] touching a persons clothes whilst they are wearing them is equivalent to touching.

6
New cards

E3 Battery ‘Force’

  • there must be sufficient force to constitute a battery

  • [Faulkner v Talbot] Any touching will suffice, need not be rude or aggressive.

7
New cards

MR Battery: ‘Intention’ [R v Mohan]

  • D must intend to apply unlawful force on V.

8
New cards

MR Battery: ‘Recklessness’ [R v Cunningham]

  • D should know and foresee that their actions open a potential risk of harm.

9
New cards

Definition of Assault [Fagan v MPC]

  • ‘an act where D Intentionally or recklessly causes V to apprehend immediate personal violence.

10
New cards

Actus Reus: Assault

  • an act which causes V to apprehend immediate unlawful violence

  • [Tuberville v Savage] words can negate to an assault.

11
New cards

E1 Assault: ‘An act’

  • [R v Constanza'] written letters are sufficient for an act

  • [R v Ireland'] silence is an ‘act’ which can amount to an assault.

12
New cards

E2 Assault: Causation

  • Factual [R v White] ‘But For’

  • Legal [R v Smith]

    • more than minimal

    • thin skull [R v Blaue]

    • third party [R v Jordan]

13
New cards

E3 Assault: Apprehend

  • must apprehend some violence

  • [R v Lamb] if V is not scared nor anticipates violence, there is no assault

  • [Logclon v DPP] Does not need to be an actual threat for there to be an assault

14
New cards

E4 Assault: ‘Immediate’

  • [Smith v Chief Constable of Woking]

    • not instantaneous but ‘imminent’

15
New cards

E5: Unlawful violence

  • V simply needs to apprehend the level of force that amounts to a technical battery i.e. touching.

16
New cards

S.39 Criminal Just Act 1988:

  • assault is a summary offence and carries up to 6 months.