1/37
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
a representative sample
allows you to make inferences on what a greater population believes
random sampling
only chance determines which elements will make it into the study (equal chance for all)
probability sampling
experimental research design, has randomization, explanatory design (answer "why" questions); allows you to make generalizations
nonprobability sampling (what we use)
cannot generalize to broader population, unknown chance of being selected, used when probability sampling isn't possible, used for explanatory research
confidence level
95%; if the same study were conducted 100 times with random samples drawn from same population, then 95 times the result would be the same
levels of measurement
nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio
nominal measurement
basic; no numerical data drawn from it; check boxes/categories
(i.e. gender, religious affiliation, etc.) - usually demographic info
ordinal measurement
grouping; meaning, but not clear implications; ranking order
(i.e. satisfaction --> high, mid, low)
interval measurement
category has distance meaning, but there is NO ZERO; scale
(i.e. IQ, etc.)
ratio measurement
equal intervals, and true zero
(i.e. age, # of kids, GPA, income)
social desiribility
tendency to say the socially acceptable things or to tell people what you think they want to hear; changes answers because of this
reactivitiy
people tend to change their behavior when they know they are being observed
random error
won't throw off results; not considered a measurement error
i.e. respondent misreads a question
patterned/systematic/nonrandom/consistent error
will throw off results/does not balance out
validity
is the instrument measuring what it says it is measuring?
(does the spiritual assessment measure spirituality)
construct validity
correlation with expected related concepts
face validity
does it make sense?
criterion validity
same result as known other measurement is the result
concurrent validity
test against other valid measure
content validity
does it fully represent concept
predictive validity
ability to predict events
testing reliability
interrater - 2 or more people all test & compare for consistency
intrarater - test same rater twice
sampling frame
a list of all of the elements in a population from which the sample is selected
sampling bias
the systematic tendency to over- or under-represent some segment of the population
nonsampling error
sampling error that is not related to the actual sampling procedure and includes inadequate sampling frames, high levels of attrition or nonresponse, and measurement and data entry errors
simple random sampling
choice of a subset of a population, i.e., the sample, utilizing a method that allows each element to have an equal chance of being chosen; the sampling frame is not subdivided and should not be ordered
systematic random sampling
nonrandom error; in measurement, those sources of error that have a pattern and will influence the overall distribution of scores
order bias
when selecting a sample, the ordering in the sampling frame corresponds with the random start and the sampling interval to create an under- or over-representation of subgroups within the population
disproportionate sampling
the proportion of each stratum in the sample does not correspond to the respective proportion in the population; small strata may be over-sampled
cluster sampling
a random sampling method in which aggregates of elements called clusters are randomly sampled first, and then the elements of the population are either all included (cluster sampling) or are randomly sampled (multistage random sampling) from the selected clusters
convenience sampling
a nonprobability sample in which the selection of sampling elements is based on the most available elements to constitute the sample
sampling error
the degree of difference between the sample and the population from which it was drawn
attrition
tendency of participants to withdraw prematurely from a research study
cutting scores
on a scale, a measure that sets the difference between two levels of a condition or performance
scale
in instrument construction, a score obtained by adding scores assigned to specific responses and also taking advantage of any intensity structure that might exist among the individual items, for instance by weighting the responses to the individual items differently
primary data
the collection of new data
secondary data
data that were previously collected for a purpose other than the research at hand
response rate
in a survey, the response rate is the percentage of all those selected in a sample who actually respond