1/62
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Capital Budgeting
Analysis of Potential Projects
Long-Term Decisions
Large Expenditures
Difficult/impossible to reverse
Determines firm’s strategic direction
Good Decision Criteria
All cash flows considered?
TVM considered?
Risk-adjusted?
Ability to rank Projects?
Indicates added value to the firm?
Steps for Capital Budgeting
Generate ideas that meet objectives of the company
Estimate CFs (inflows & outflows)
Asses riskiness of CFs
Determine the appropriate cost of capital
Find NPV and/or IRR.
Accept if NPV>0 and/or IRR>WACC
Capital Budgeting Methods Used
Payback
NPV
IRR
Profitability Index (PI)
Net Present Value
How much value is created from undertaking an investment
NPV is a direct measure of how well this project will meet the goal of increasing shareholder wealth
NPV>0 means: accept project, project is expected to add value to firm, and will increase the wealth of the owners
Meets all desirable criteria
Considers all CFs
Considers TVM
Adjusts for risk
can rank mutually exclusive projects
Metric: $
Dominant method: always prevails
Payback Period
How long does it take to recover the initial cost of a project?
Estimate the cash flows
Subtract the future cash flows from the initial cost until initial investment is recovered
A “break-even” type measure
Metric: Years
Decision Rule: Accept if the payback period is less than some preset limit
Advantages of Payback
Easy to understand
Adjusts for uncertainty of later cash flows
Biased towards liquidity
Disadvantages of Payback Period
Ignores the time value of money
Requires an arbitrary cutoff point
Ignores cash flows beyond the cutoff date
Biased against long-term projects, such as research and development, and new projects
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Independent of interest rates. Based on entirely on the estimated cash flows. Intuitively appealing.
Discount rate that make NPV=0
Decision Rule: accept the project if the IRR is greater than the required return
Metric: %
Most important alternative to NPV
Widely used in practice
Advantage of IRR
Preferred by executives
Intuitively appealing
Easy to communicate the value of a project
If the IRR is high enough, may not need to estimate a required return
Considers all cash flows
Considers time value of money
provides indication of Risk
Disadvantages Of IRR
Can produce multiple answers
Cannot rank mutually exclusive projects
Reinvestment assumption flawed
Nonconventional Cash Flows
Cash flow sign changes more than once
Most common:
Initial cost (negative CF)
a stream of positive CFs
Negative cash flow to close project
For ex, nuclear power plant or strip mine
Mutually Exclusive Projects
Initial investments are substantially different
Timing of cash flow is substantially different.
Will not reliably rank projects
“If you accept one project, you cannot accept the other”
Reinvestment Rate Assumption
IRR assumes reinvestment at IRR
NPV assumes reinvestment at the firm’s weighted average cost capital (opportunity cost capital)
More realistic
NPV method is Best
Use NPV to choose between mutually exclusive projects
Two Reasons NPV Profiles Cross
Size (scale) differences
Smaller project frees up funds sooner for investment
The higher the opportunity cost, the more valuable these funds, so a high discount rate favors small projects
Timing differences
Project with faster payback provides more CF in early years for reinvestment
If discount rate is high, early CF especially good
Conflicts between NPV and IRR
NPV directly measures the increase in value to the firm
Whenever there is a conflict between NPV and another decision rule, always use NPV
IRR is unreliable in the following situations:
Nonconventional cash flows
Mutually exclusive projects
Profitability Index
Measures the benefit per unit cost, based on the time value of money
A PI of 1.1 implies that for every $1 of investment, we create an additional $0.10 in value
Can be very useful in situations for capital rationing
Metric: Ratio
Decision Rule: If PI>1 accept the project
Advantages of PI
Closely related to NPV, generally leading to identical decisions
Considers all CFs
Considers TVM
Easy to understand and communicate
Useful in capital rationing
Disadvantages of PI
May lead to incorrect decisions in comparisons of mutually exclusive investments (can conflict with NPV)
Capital Budgeting Practice
Consider all investment criteria when making decisions
NPV and IRR are the most commonly used primary investment criteria
Payback is a commonly used secondary investment criteria
All provide valuable information
Relevant Cash Flows
Include cash flows that will only occur if the project is accepted
Incremental Cash Flows
Is the increase in cash that the addition of a specific new project generates above the current cash flow
Corporate cash flow with the project —- corporate cash flow without the project
Stand Alone Principle
allows use to analyze each project in isolation from the firm by focusing on incremental cash flows
Sunk Costs
Expenses that have already been incurred, or that will be incurred, regardless of the decision to accept or reject a project
For example, a marketing research study exploring business possibilities in a region would be a ___ cost, since its expenditure has done prior to undertaking the project and will have to be paid whether or not the project is taken.
NOT RELEVANT
Opportunity Costs
Costs that may not be directly observable or obvious, but result from benefits being lost as a result of taking on a project
For Example, if a firm decides to use an idle piece of equipment as part of new business, the value of the equipment as part of a new business, the value of the equipment that could be realized by either selling or leasing it would be releveant
INCLUDE
Synergy Gains
The impulse purchase or sales increases for other existing products related to the introduction of a new product
For example, if a gas station with a convenience store attached, adds a line of fresh donuts and bagels, the sales of coffee and milk, would result in synergy gains
Include
Erosion Costs
Cost that arise when a new product or service competes with revenue generated by a current product or service offered by a firm
For ex, if a store offers two types of photo-copying services, a newer, more expensive choice and an older economical one.
Some of the the revenues from the older repeat customers will be lost and should therefore be accounted for in the incremental cash flows
Include
Calculation:
Consider the amount of lost contribution margin i.e. (selling price— unit cost) from SSD’s drop in sales
Erosion Cost= (Unit Sales of SSD before launch)— (unit sales after launch) X (selling price - Unit cost)
Changes in Net Working Capital (NWC)
Current Assets—- Current Liabilities
A INCREASE in net working capital consumes cash
A DECREASE in net working capital frees up cash
Profit is not cash because of accural accounting
Revenue is recognized when it’s earned, not when cash is received > creates AR
Expenses are recognized when they’re incurred, not when cash is paid> creates AP
Operational NWC
(AR + Inventory)— AP
Operating Cash Flow
EBIT + Depreciation— Taxes
Cash Flow From Assets
OCF——Net Capital Spending (NCS)— Changes in NWC= OCF + CFncs + CF NWC
Steps Required for Making capital Investment Decisions (CHP 9)
Step 1: Cash flows Out: Year 0
Capital Spending
Working capital
Step 2a: Calculate annual depreciation
Step 2b: Cash Flows IN— Years 1—- end of project— annual operating cash flows (OCF)
Step 3: Cash Flows In: Terminal Year
After- tax Salvage Value
Working Capital recapture
Step 4: use cash flows to calculate NPV, IRR, Payback
The Tax Shield Approach to OCF
OCF= EBITDA (1—Tc) + (Depreciation) (Tc)
EBITDA= Sales—Costs)= EBIT + Depreciation
Tc= Marginal tax rate
Particularly useful when the major incremental cash flows are the purchase of equipment and the associated depreciation tax shield.
Depreciation and Capital Budgeting
Use the schedule required by the IRS for tax purposes
Depreciation is a noncash expense
Only relevant due to tax effects
Depreciation tax shield= D x Tc
D= Depreciation expense
Tc= Marginal tax rate
Straight- Line Depreciation
Spreads the cost evenly over the asset’s useful life
D= (Initial cost— Salvage)/useful life (years)
same depreciation amount each year; easier to calculate and understand
MACRS Depreciation
An accelerated method used for U.S. tax purposes that allows for larger depreciation deductions in the early years of an asset’s life
Key Features:
Accelerated: Higher deductions upfront, then decreasing over time
Depreciate to Zero: Assumes a zero salvage value for tax purposes
Recovery Period: Assets are assigned to specific “classes” with defined “recovery periods” (e.g. 3 year, 5 year, 7 year property), which is often shorter than the assets actual useful life
After- Tax Salvage Value (ATSV)
When an asset is sold, there are two cash flow events:
The cash received from the buyer (the Salvage Value)
The tax impact from the sale ( a tax payment on gain or a tax shield from a loss)
Step 1: Find the Taxable Gain Or Loss
Taxable Gain or Loss= Salvage Value— Book Value
Salvage Value (SV): The market Price you sell the asset for
Book Value (BV): the assets’s value on your balance sheet
BV= Initial cost—- Accumulated Depreciation
Step 2: Calculate the Tax Impact (use marginal tax rate Tc)
Scenario A: Gain ( SV> BV)
Selling Price> Book value
You must pay taxes on profit
Tax impact= Taxes Paid ( a cash outflow)
Taxes Paid= T (SV-BV)
Scenario B: Loss (SV < BV)
Selling Price < Book Value
This loss creates a tax shield (a tax saving)
Tax Impact= Tax Shield (a cash inflow)
Tax Shield= T (SV-BV)
Step 3: Find the Total After-Tax Salvage Value
If you had a GAIN:
ATSV= Salvage Value — Taxes Paid on Gain
= Salvage Value — (Tax rate* taxable Gain)
If you had Loss:
ATSV= Salvage Value — Taxes Paid on Loss
=Salvage Value — (Tax rate * Taxable Loss)
The taxable loss is negative
Forecasting Risk
Sensitivity of NPV to changes in cash flow estimates
The more sensitive, the greater the forecasting risk
Scenario Analysis
Examines several possible situations
Worst Case
Base case or most likely case
Best case
Provides a range of possible outcomes
Problems with Scenario Analysis
Considers only a few possible outcomes
Assumes perfectly correlated inputs
All “bad” values occur together and all “good” values occur together
Focuses on stand-alone risk, although subjective adjustments can be made
No Decision Rule
Ignores Diversification
Sensitivity Analysis
Shows how changes in an input variable affect NPV or IRR each variable is fixed except one.
Strengths:
Provides indication of stand-alone risk
Identifies dangerous variables
Gives some breakeven information
Weaknesses:
Does not reflect diversification
Says nothing about the likelihood of change in a variable
Ignores relationships among variables.
No Decision Rule
Ignores Diversification
Managerial Options
Contingency Planning
Option to Expand:
Expansion of Existing Product Line
New Products
New geographic markets
Option to abandon
Contraction
Temporary suspension
Option to Wait
Strategic Options
Capital Rationing
Occurs when a firm or division has limited resources
Soft: the limited resources are temporary, often self-imposed
Hard: capital will never be available for this project
The PI is useful tool when faced with soft rationing
Weighed Average Cost Capital
WACC= WcRs + WpRp + WdRd( 1 -- T)
Wc= weight of common equity
Wp= weight of preferred stock
Wd= weight of debt.
These represent the proportion of financing coming from each source in the firm’s capital structure. All weights together add up to 1
Rs= cost of common equity
Rp= cost of preferred stock
rd= cost of debt
These represent the required return investors demand for each financing source. Interest rate paid on loans/bonds.
Minimum acceptable rate of return the firm should earn on its investments of average risk in order to be profitable
= discount rate for computing NPV
IRR> WACC for acceptance of project
Cost of Capital Basics
The cost to a firm for capital funding
= the return to the providers of those funds
The return earned on assets depends on the risk of those assets
A firm’s cost of capital indicates how the market views the risk of the firm’s assets
A firm must earn at least the required return to compensate investors for the financing they have provided
The required return is the same as the appropriate discount rate
Cost of Equity: Rs
Return required by equity investors given the risk of the cash flows from the firm
Firm’s perspective: minimum return it must earn on new equity financed projects to keep its stock price stable
Investor’s perspective: expected return on the company’s stock, given its risk.
Two major methods for determining the cost of Equity
Dividend Growth Model
Re= D1/Po + G
SML Or CAPM
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Dividend Growth Model
ADV: Easy to understand
Disadvantages:
Only applicable to companies currently paying dividends
Not applicable if dividends aren’t growing at a reasonably constant rate
Extremely sensitive to the estimated growth rate
Does not explicitly consider risk
The SML Approach
Security Market Line
Re= Rf + Be (E(Rm) - Rf)
Rf: risk-free rate
(E(Rm) - Rf): Market risk premium
B: systematic risk of asset
Advantages of SML
Explicitly adjusts for systematic risk
Applicable to all companies, as long as beta is available
Disadvantages of SML
Must estimate the expected market risk premium, which does vary over time
Must estimate beta, which also varies over time
Relies on the past to predict the future, which is not always reliable.
Cost of Debt: Rd
The required return on a company’s debt
Method 1: compute the Yield to Maturity (YTM)
Method 2: use estimates of current rates based on the bond rating expected on new debt
The cost of debt is NOT the coupon rate
After Tax Cost of Debt
= Rd, bt (1 - Tc)
Cost of Preferred Stock Rp
Preferred pays a constant dividend each period
Dividends expected to be paid forever
P/S is a perpetuity
Rp= D/Po
Determining the Weights for the WACC
weights= percentages of the firm that will be financed by each component
Always use target weights, if possible.
If not available, use market value
Capital Structure Weights
E: Market value of equity
number of outstanding shares times price per share
D: Market Value od Debt
number of outstanding bonds times bond price
V: Market value of the firm= D + E
E/V: % financed with equity= wc
D/V: % financed with debt= wd
Factors that Influence a Company’s WACC
Market conditions, especially interest rates, tax rates, and the market risk premium
The firm’s capital structure and dividend policy
The firm’s investment policy
Firm’s with riskier projects generally have a higher WACC
Pure Play Approach
Find one or more companies that specialize in the product or service being considered
Compute the beta for each company
Take an average
Use that beat along with the CAPM to find the appropriate return for a project of that risk
Pure play companies can be difficult to find
Subjective Approach
Consider the project’s risk relative to the firm overall
If the project is risker than the firm, use a discount rate greater than the WACC
If the project is less risky than the firm, use a discount less than WACC
Risk-Return Trade-Off
Two key lessons from capital market history:
There is a reward for bearing risk
The greater the potential reward, the greater risk
Total Dollar Return
Return on an investment measured in dollars
Dollar return= Dividends + Capital gains
Capital gains= Price received — Price paid
Total Percent Return
the return on an investment measured as a percentage of the original investment
Percent return= dollar return/dollar invested
Linear Scale
Linear Axis: equal vertical distance = equal absolute change ($)
Shows absolute dollar change. This scale can be misleading, as it makes recent volatility look enormous and early growth insignifcant
Logarithmic Scale
Log Axis: equal vertical distance= equal percentage change (%)
Shows rate of change (percentage). Each vertical step represents a consistent percentage gain (e.g. a 100% return). A straight line on a long chart implies constant compound growth.
Conclusion: A log scale is the standard for visualizing long-term, compounding investment performance as it accurately reprents growth rates over time.